Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantifying shark and ray discards in Western Australia’s shark fisheries

Matias Braccini https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4317-8186 A C and Hilario Murua B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development of Western Australia, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920, Australia.

B International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), 1440 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: matias.braccini@dpird.wa.gov.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 73(3) 283-291 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21159
Submitted: 1 June 2021  Accepted: 11 October 2021   Published: 9 November 2021

Abstract

Commercial fisheries can discard a considerable volume of sharks and rays, which, as a group, are of high conservation concern. In Western Australia (WA), commercial shark fishing commenced in the 1940s; however, catch time series are not available for discarded species. The present study quantified catch (i.e. dead individuals) time series of discarded sharks and rays in WA’s shark fisheries using on-board observer information collected since 1993 and testing assumptions through sensitivity analysis. Overall, 18 shark and ray taxonomic groups were discarded, comprising ~20% of the observed catch by number. Port Jackson shark, southern eagle ray and spurdogs were the most commonly discarded elasmobranchs, followed by western wobbegong, angel sharks, stingrays, and guitarfish and shovelnose rays. For the base case scenario, the catch of these species was small, peaking at 12.6, 5.6, 1.3, 1.8, 4, 1.3 and 2.7 tonnes (Mg) respectively, given their low post-release mortality (PRM). Current catch levels were even lower (e.g. <5 Mg for Port Jackson shark). Other discarded elasmobranchs were rarely caught. Assuming 100% PRM resulted in higher annual catches, highlighting the need for further research on the PRM of sharks and rays. The reconstructed catch series will be used in risk assessments to determine the sustainability of discarded species.

Keywords: conservation, elasmobranchs, gill-net fishery, management.


References

Amandè, M. J., Ariz, J., Chassot, E., De Molina, A. D., Gaertner, D., Murua, H., Pianet, R., Ruiz, J., and Chavance, P. (2010). Bycatch of the European purse seine tuna fishery in the Atlantic Ocean for the 2003–2007 period. Aquatic Living Resources 23, 353–362.
Bycatch of the European purse seine tuna fishery in the Atlantic Ocean for the 2003–2007 period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Amandè, M. J., Chassot, E., Chavance, P., Murua, H., Delgado De Molina, A., and Bez, N. (2012). Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69, 1501–1510.
Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Babcock, E. A., Barnette, M., Bohnsack, J., Isely, J. J., Porch, C., Richards, P., Sasso, C., and Zhang, X. (2018). Integrated Bayesian models to estimate bycatch of sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico and southeastern US Atlantic coast shrimp otter trawl fishery. Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-721, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, FL, USA.
| Crossref |

Benjamins, S., Kulka, D. W., and Lawson, J. (2010). Recent incidental catch of sharks in gillnet fisheries of newfoundland and labrador, Canada. Endangered Species Research 11, 133–146.
Recent incidental catch of sharks in gillnet fisheries of newfoundland and labrador, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Botsford, L., Castilla, J., and Peterson, C. (1997). The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Science 277, 509–515.
The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braccini, M., Van Rijn, J., and Frick, L. (2012). High post-capture survival for sharks, rays and chimaeras discarded in the main shark fishery of Australia? PLoS One 7, e32547.
High post-capture survival for sharks, rays and chimaeras discarded in the main shark fishery of Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22384270PubMed |

Braccini, M., Blay, N., Hesp, A., and Molony, B. (2018). Resource assessment report temperate demersal elasmobranch resource of Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report 294, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Braccini, M., Kangas, M., Jaiteh, V., and Newman, S. (2021). Quantifying the unreported and unaccounted domestic and foreign commercial catch of sharks and rays in Western Australia. Ambio 50, 1337–1350.
Quantifying the unreported and unaccounted domestic and foreign commercial catch of sharks and rays in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33550570PubMed |

D’Agrosa, C., Lennert-Cody, C. E., and Vidal, O. (2000). Vaquita bycatch in Mexico’s artisanal gillnet fisheries: driving a small population to extinction. Conservation Biology 14, 1110–1119.
Vaquita bycatch in Mexico’s artisanal gillnet fisheries: driving a small population to extinction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dapp, D., Walker, T., Huveneers, C., and Reina, R. (2016). Respiratory mode and gear type are important determinants of elasmobranch immediate and post-release mortality. Fish and Fisheries 17, 507–524.
Respiratory mode and gear type are important determinants of elasmobranch immediate and post-release mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dulvy, N. K., Fowler, S. L., Musick, J. A., Cavanagh, R. D., Kyne, P. M., Harrison, L. R., Carlson, J. K., Davidson, L. N., Fordham, S. V., Francis, M. P., Pollock, C. M., Simpfendorfer, C. A., Burgess, G. H., Carpenter, K. E., Compagno, L. J., Ebert, D. A., Gibson, C., Heupel, M. R., Livingstone, S. R., Sanciangco, J. C., Stevens, J. D., Valenti, S., and White, W. T. (2014). Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. eLife 3, e00590.
Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24448405PubMed |

Dulvy, N., Simpfendorfer, C. A., Davidson, L., Frodham, S., Brautigam, A., Sant, G., and Welch, D. J. (2017). Challenges and priorities in shark and ray conservation. Current Biology 27, R565–R572.
Challenges and priorities in shark and ray conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28586694PubMed |

Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. (1993). ‘An Introduction to the Bootstrap.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA.)

Ellis, J. R., McCully Phillips, S. R., and Poisson, F. (2017). A review of capture and post-release mortality of elasmobranchs. Journal of Fish Biology 90, 653–722.
A review of capture and post-release mortality of elasmobranchs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27864942PubMed |

Fletcher, W. J., Shaw, J., Metcalf, S. J., and Gaughan, D. J. (2010). An ecosystem based fisheries management framework: the efficient, regional-level planning tool for management agencies. Marine Policy 34, 1226–1238.
An ecosystem based fisheries management framework: the efficient, regional-level planning tool for management agencies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilman, E., Suuronen, P., and Chaloupka, M. (2017). Discards in global tuna fisheries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 582, 231–252.
Discards in global tuna fisheries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guida, L., Awruch, C., Walker, T. I., and Reina, R. D. (2017). Prenatal stress from trawl capture affects mothers and neonates: a case study using the southern fiddler ray (Trygonorrhina dumerilii). Scientific Reports 7, 46300.
Prenatal stress from trawl capture affects mothers and neonates: a case study using the southern fiddler ray (Trygonorrhina dumerilii).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28401959PubMed |

Harrington, J. M., Myers, R. A., and Rosenberg, A. A. (2005). Wasted fishery resources: discarded by-catch in the USA. Fish and Fisheries 6, 350–361.
Wasted fishery resources: discarded by-catch in the USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

James, K. C., Lewison, R. L., Dillingham, P. W., Curtis, K. A., and Moore, J. E. (2016). Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch. Environmental Conservation 43, 3–12.
Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones, A. A., Hall, N. G., and Potter, I. C. (2010). Species compositions of elasmobranchs caught by three different commercial fishing methods off southwestern Australia, and biological data for four abundant bycatch species. Fishery Bulletin 108, 365–381.

Kyne, P., Carlson, J., Ebert, D., Fordham, S., Bizzarro, J., Graham, R., Kulka, D., Tewes, E., Harrison, L., and Dulvy, N. (2012). The conservation status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean chondrichthyans. IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Last, P. R., and Stevens, J. D. (2009). ‘Sharks and Rays of Australia’, 2nd edn. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

McAuley, R., and Simpfendorfer, C. (2003). Catch composition of the Western Australian temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, 1994 to 1999. Fisheries Research Report 146 Department of Fisheries, Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Molony, B., McAuley, R. B., and Rowland, F. (2013). Northern shark fisheries status report: statistics only. In ‘Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2012/13: the State of the Fisheries’. (Eds W. J. Fletcher and K. Santoro.) pp. 216–217. (Department of Fisheries: Perth, WA, Australia.)

Oliver, S., Braccini, M., Newman, S. J., and Harvey, E. S. (2015). Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays. Marine Policy 54, 86–97.
Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Punt, E., Sepúlveda, M., Siple, M. C., Rey, J., Francis, T. B., Hammond, P. S., Heinemann, D., Long, K. J., Oliva, D., Reeves, R. R., Víkingsson, G., Wade, P. R., Williams, R., and Zerbini, A. N. (2021). Assessing pinniped bycatch mortality with uncertainty in abundance and post-release mortality: a case study from Chile. Fisheries Research 235, 105816.
Assessing pinniped bycatch mortality with uncertainty in abundance and post-release mortality: a case study from Chile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Raoult, V., Williamson, J. E., Smith, T. M., and Gaston, T. F. (2019). Effects of on-deck holding conditions and air exposure on post-release behaviours of sharks revealed by a remote operated vehicle. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 511, 10–18.
Effects of on-deck holding conditions and air exposure on post-release behaviours of sharks revealed by a remote operated vehicle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simpfendorfer, C., and Donohue, K. J. (1998). Keeping the fish in “fish and chips”: research and management of the Western Australian shark fishery. Marine and Freshwater Research 49, 593–600.
Keeping the fish in “fish and chips”: research and management of the Western Australian shark fishery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Simpfendorfer, C., Chin, A., Kyne, P., Rigby, C., Sherman, S., and White, W. (2019). Shark futures: a report card for Australia’s sharks and rays. Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Stevens, J. D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N. K., and Walker, P. A. (2000). The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 476–494.
The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stobutzki, I., Miller, M., and Brewer, D. (2001). Sustainability of fishery by-catch: a process for assessing highly diverse and numerous by-catch. Environmental Conservation 28, 167–181.
Sustainability of fishery by-catch: a process for assessing highly diverse and numerous by-catch.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Talwar, B., Brooks, E. J., Mandelman, J. W., and Grubbs, R. D. (2017). Stress, post-release mortality, and recovery of commonly discarded deep-sea sharks caught on longlines. Marine Ecology Progress Series 582, 147–161.
Stress, post-release mortality, and recovery of commonly discarded deep-sea sharks caught on longlines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, S. M., Braccini, J. M., Bruce, B. D., and McAuley, R. B. (2018). Reconstructing Western Australian white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) catches based on interviews with fishers. Marine and Freshwater Research 69, 366–375.
Reconstructing Western Australian white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) catches based on interviews with fishers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walker, T. I., Hudson, R. J., and Gason, A. S. (2005). Catch evaluation of target, by-product and by-catch species taken by gillnets and longlines in the shark fishery of South-eastern Australia. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 35, 505–530.
Catch evaluation of target, by-product and by-catch species taken by gillnets and longlines in the shark fishery of South-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zeller, D., Cashion, T., Palomares, M., and Pauly, D. (2018). Global marine fisheries discards: a synthesis of reconstructed data. Fish and Fisheries 19, 30–39.
Global marine fisheries discards: a synthesis of reconstructed data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |