Toward land restoration transitions: elevating regional voices and the provenance of co-benefits in Queensland rangelands

Nikki P. Dumbrell; Catherine J. Robinson; Katie D. Ricketts; Danilo Urzedo; Lisa Walker; Anthelia J. Bond

doi:10.1071/RJ23045

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Previous Contents Vol 46(1)

Toward land restoration transitions: elevating regional voices and the provenance of co-benefits in Queensland rangelands

Nikki P. Dumbrell

^A ^* , Catherine J. Robinson ^B ^C , Katie D. Ricketts ^A , Danilo Urzedo ^B , Lisa Walker ^D and Anthelia J. Bond ^E ^F

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A CSIRO Agriculture and Food Business Unit, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

^B CSIRO Environment Business Unit, Ecosciences Precinct, Boggo Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia.

^C Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.

^D CSIRO Agriculture and Food Business Unit, Queensland BioSciences Precinct, Carmody Road, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia.

^E CSIRO Environment Business Unit, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

^F Present Address: Centre for Global Food and Resources, School of Economics and Public Policy, The University of Adelaide, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

^* Correspondence to: Nikki.Dumbrell@csiro.au

The Rangeland Journal 46, RJ23045 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ23045

Submitted: 8 November 2023 Accepted: 4 February 2024 Published: 19 February 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Rangeland Society. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Land management changes are and will continue to play a substantial role in national and global strategies towards decarbonisation goals. Yet, roles for land managers and their communities to co-create opportunities for just transitions are not well represented or accounted for in policy instruments or markets, including those for carbon offsets. Understanding regional context is critical to identify strategies for land management changes to underpin just transitions. We outline a mixed-methods approach involving an analysis of socio-economic data and a critical review of regional plans to identify the benefit aspirations that communities have articulated, and the drivers of transitions already at play to understand how land sector carbon abatement projects could support regional transitions. This approach is demonstrated using a case study region in Queensland, Australia. The case study region hosts land sector carbon abatement projects under a national policy that incentivises least cost abatement and under a state policy that incentivises land sector carbon abatement with bundled environmental and social co-benefits. The results show that across sectors and locations, communities are seeking economic, cultural, and social outcomes that can be delivered as co-benefits of land management changes for carbon abatement. Our analysis shows that the value of multiple co-benefits is place-specific and dependent on the provenance of land management changes and broader regional conditions. By understanding regional contexts and aspirations, it is possible to identify how and where land sector carbon abatement investments can be negotiated between investors and communities to support just transitions to low-carbon futures.

Keywords: carbon farming, decarbonisation, just transitions, land use change, place-based benefits, regional planning, regional provenance, social co-benefits.

References

ABS (2013) Division definitions: Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC). Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-industrial-classification-anzsic/2006-revision-2-0/division-definitions [accessed 18 April 2023]

ABS (2015) National Agricultural Statistics Review – final report, 2015. Cat. no. 7105.0.55.004. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/7105.0.55.004main+features132015 [accessed 10 January 2020]

ABS (2022a) Australian Census of Population and Housing 2021, [Census TableBuilder]. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/microdata-tablebuilder/tablebuilder [accessed 18 April 2023]

ABS (2022b) Counts of Australian Businesses, including Entries and Exits, June 2018 to June 2022. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/business-indicators/counts-australian-businesses-including-entries-and-exits/latest-release [accessed 11 May 2023]

Agrawal A, Brandhorst S, Jain M, Liao C, Pradhan N, Solomon D (2022) From environmental governance to governance for sustainability. One Earth 5, 615-621.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Al Jaber A (2023) COP28 Letter to Parties. Available at https://www.cop28.com/en/letter-to-parties [accessed 10 August 2023]

Baumber A, Cross R, Waters C, Metternicht G, Kam H (2022) Understanding the social licence of carbon farming in the Australian rangelands. Sustainability 14, 174.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Baumber A, Waters C, Cross R, Metternicht G, Simpson M (2020) Carbon farming for resilient rangelands: people, paddocks and policy. The Rangeland Journal 42, 293-307.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bigambul Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (2018) Strategic Plan 2018–2023. Millmerran, Australia. Available at https://www.bigambul.com.au/wp-content/uploads/17-12-15-BNTAC_Strategic-Plan_LOW-RES.pdf [accessed 22 June 2023]

Booker K, Huntsinger L, Bartolome JW, Sayre NF, Stewart W (2013) What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States? Global Environmental Change 23, 240-251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bottazzi P, Cattaneo A, Rocha DC, Rist S (2013) Assessing sustainable forest management under REDD plus: a community-based labour perspective. Ecological Economics 93, 94-103.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bryan BA, Meyer WS, Campbell CA, Harris GP, Lefroy T, Lyle G, Martin P, McLean J, Montagu K, Rickards LA, Summers DM, Thackway R, Wells S, Young M (2013) The second industrial transformation of Australian landscapes. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 278-287.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Burke PJ (2016) Undermined by adverse selection: Australia’s direct action abatement subsidies. Economic Papers 35, 216-229.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

CCBA (2017) Climate Community & Biodiversity Standards: v3.1. Climate, Community & Biodiversity Alliance and VCS, Washington, DC, USA. Available at https://verra.org/wp-content/uploads/CCB-Standards-v3.1_ENG.pdf [accessed 14 October 2022]

Clean Energy Regulator (2023a) Auctions Results. Available at http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Auctions-results [accessed 15 June 2023]

Clean Energy Regulator (2023b) Emissions Reduction Fund project register. Available at www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/project-and-contracts-registers/project-register [accessed 18 May 2023]

Curry P, Friesen L, Masden R, McKenzie I, Thorpe J (2022) Carbon farming perceptions among landholders and local governments of southern Queensland, Agrifutures Australia, Publication Number 23-118. Available at https://agrifutures.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/23-118.pdf [accessed 28 September 2023]

Daum T, Baudron F, Birner R, Qaim M, Grass I (2023) Addressing agricultural labour issues is key to biodiversity-smart farming. Biological Conservation 284, 110165.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DCCEEW (2022) Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business, Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. Available at https://epbcactreview.environment.gov.au/ [accessed 19 March 2023]

Deng HM, Liang QM, Liu LJ, Anadon LD (2017) Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environmental Research Letters 12, 123001.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DES (2013) Regional NRM body – southern Queensland Landscapes. Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, Qld, Australia. Available at https://wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/facts-maps/nrm-southern-queensland-landscapes/ [accessed 31 May 2023]

DES (2021) The Land Restoration Fund Priority Investment Plan. Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Qld, Australia. Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/116547/lrf-priority-investment-plan.pdf [accessed 15 August 2022]

DES (2022) Queensland Climate Action Plan. Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government. Available at https://www.des.qld.gov.au/climateaction [accessed 5 July 2022]

DES (2023a) Land Restoration Fund Co-benefits Standard, Version 1.4. Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Qld, Australia. Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/116548/lrf-co-benefits-standard.pdf [accessed 27 May 2023]

DES (2023b) Land Restoration Fund Register. Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, Qld, Australia. Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/climate/climate-change/land-restoration-fund/funded-projects/lrf-register [accessed 22 June 2023]

Dewi S, Van Noordwijk M, Zulkarnain MT, Dwiputra A, Hyman G, Prabhu R, Gitz V, Nasi R (2017) Tropical forest-transition landscapes: a portfolio for studying people, tree crops and agro-ecological change in context. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 13, 312-329.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Di Sacco A, Hardwick KA, Blakesley D, Brancalion PHS, Breman E, Cecilio Rebola L, Chomba S, Dixon K, Elliott S, Ruyonga G, Shaw K, Smith P, Smith RJ, Antonelli A (2021) Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Global Change Biology 27, 1328-1348.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

DISER (2020) Technology Investment Roadmap: First Low Emissions Technology Statement. Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. Available at https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/technology-investment-roadmap-first-low-emissions-technology-statement-2020 [accessed 26 October 2020]

Dumbrell NP, Kragt ME, Meier EA, Biggs JS, Thorburn PJ (2017) Greenhouse gas abatement costs are heterogeneous between Australian grain farms. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37, 28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Duncan T, Villarreal-Rosas J, Carwardine J, Garnett ST, Robinson CJ (2018) Influence of environmental governance regimes on the capacity of Indigenous peoples to participate in conservation managment. Parks 24, 87-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Evans G, Phelan L (2016) Transition to a post-carbon society: linking environmental justice and just transition discourses. Energy Policy 99, 329-339.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Everingham JA, Svobodova K, Lèbre É, Owen JR, Worden S (2022) Comparative capacity of global mining regions to transition to a post-mining future. The Extractive Industries and Society 11, 101136.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Feng H, Kling CL (2005) The consequences of cobenefits for the efficient design of carbon sequestration programs. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics - Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie 53, 461-476.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fleming-Muñoz DA, Poruschi L, Measham T, Meyers J, Moglia M (2020) Economic vulnerability and regional implications of a low carbon emissions future. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 64, 575-604.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Foran B, Smith MS, Burnside D, Andrew M, Blesing D, Forrest K, Taylor J (2019) Australian rangeland futures: time now for systemic responses to interconnected challenges. The Rangeland Journal 41, 271-292.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gangjee DS (2017) Proving provenance? Geographical indications certification and its ambiguities. World Development 98, 12-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Grant MJ, Booth A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal 26, 91-108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Green F, Gambhir A (2020) Transitional assistance policies for just, equitable and smooth low-carbon transitions: who, what and how? Climate Policy 20, 902-921.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Heffron R (2022) ‘Achieving a Just Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy.’ (Palgrave Macmillan: Cham) doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89460-3

Informed Decisions and Regional Development Australia (2023) RDA Darling Downs and South West Region Economic Profile. Available at https://economy.id.com.au/rda-dd-sw [accessed 10 July 2023]

IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. In ‘Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. (Eds O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, E Farahani, S Kadner, K Seyboth, A Adler, I Baum, S Brunner, P Eickemeier, B Kriemann, J Savolainen, S Schlömer, CTZ von Stechow, JC Minx) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; and New York, NY, USA)

Jackson S, Palmer L, McDonald F, Bumpus A (2017) Cultures of carbon and the logic of care: the possibilities for carbon enrichment and its cultural signature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107, 867-882.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jassim D, Witt B, Evans MC (2022) Community perceptions of carbon farming: a case study of the semi-arid Mulga Lands in Queensland, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 96, 78-88.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

KCI (2023) Implementation of just transition and economic diversification strategies: a compilation of best practices from different countries. Katowice Committee of Experts on the Impacts of the Implementation of Response Measures (KCI). UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. Available at https://unfccc.int/documents/624596 [accessed 18 January 2024]

Kingwell R (2021) Agriculture’s carbon neutral challenge: the case of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 65, 566-595.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kragt ME, Dumbrell NP, Blackmore L (2017) Motivations and barriers for Western Australian broad-acre farmers to adopt carbon farming. Environmental Science & Policy 73, 115-123.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kragt ME, Gibson FL, Maseyk F, Wilson KA (2016) Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits. Ecological Economics 126, 125-131.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lane M, Robinson C, Taylor B (2009) ‘Contested country.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Le Tourneau F-M (2020) Sparsely populated regions as a specific geographical environment. Journal of Rural Studies 75, 70-79.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Liao C, Agrawal A, Clark PE, Levin SA, Rubenstein DI (2020) Landscape sustainability science in the drylands: mobility, rangelands and livelihoods. Landscape Ecology 35, 2433-2447.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Londres M, Salk C, Andersson KP, Tengö M, Brondizio ES, Russo Lopes G, Siani SMO, Molina-Garzón A, Sonetti-González T, Montoya DR, Futemma C, de Castro F, Tourne DCM (2023) Place-based solutions for global social-ecological dilemmas: an analysis of locally grounded, diversified, and cross-scalar initiatives in the Amazon. Global Environmental Change 82, 102718.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morgan K, Marsden T, Murdoch J (2008) ‘Worlds of Food: Place, Power, and Provenance in the Food Chain.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Neely, C, Bunning, S, Wilkes, A (2009) ‘Review of evidence on drylands pastoral systems and climate change.’ (FAO: Rome, Italy)

Nguyen-Trung K, Kaufman S, Saeri AK (2022) ‘Climate Adaptation Challenge Briefing: Challenges facing communities that rely on natural resource management and natural capital, BehaviourWorks Australia.’ (Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia) doi:10.26180/23951292

Nolan RH, Sinclair J, Eldridge DJ, Ramp D (2018) Biophysical risks to carbon sequestration and storage in Australian drylands. Journal of Environmental Management 208, 102-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Nori M, Scoones I (2023) Rethinking policies for pastoralists – governing the rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 45, 53-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

NRM Regions Australia (2023) The Regional NRM Model. Available at https://nrmregionsaustralia.com.au/what-is-nrm/nrm_regional_model/ [accessed 12 August 2023]

Ochieng NT, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N (2018) The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 20-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Onaindia M, de Manuel BF, Madariaga I, Rodríguez-Loinaz G (2013) Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecology and Management 289, 1-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Oxford Dictionary (2022) ‘provenance, n.’. Oxford Englsh Dictionary Online. (Oxford University Press) Available at https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/153408 [accessed 19 July 2022]

Paul KI, Reeson A, Polglase P, Crossman N, Freudenberger D, Hawkins C (2013) Economic and employment implications of a carbon market for integrated farm forestry and biodiverse environmental plantings. Land Use Policy 30, 496-506.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pittock B (2011) Co-benefits of large-scale renewables in remote Australia: energy futures and climate change. The Rangeland Journal 33, 315-325.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pörtner HO, Scholes RJ, Agard J, Archer E, Arneth A, Bai X, Barnes D, Burrows M, Chan L, Cheung WL, Diamond S, Donatti C, Duarte C, Eisenhauer N, Foden W, Gasalla MA, Handa C, Hickler T, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Ichii K, Jacob U, Insarov G, Kiessling W, Leadley P, Leemans R, Levin L, Lim M, Maharaj S, Managi S, Marquet PA, McElwee P, Midgley G, Oberdorff T, Obura D, Osman E, Pandit R, Pascual U, Pires APF, Popp A, ReyesGarcía V, Sankaran M, Settele J, Shin YJ, Sintayehu DW, Smith P, Steiner N, Strassburg B, Sukumar R, Trisos C, Val AL, Wu J, Aldrian E, Parmesan C, Pichs-Madruga R, Roberts DC, Rogers AD, Díaz S, Fischer M, Hashimoto, S, Lavorel S, Wu N, Ngo HT (2021) ‘IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change.’ (IPBES and IPCC)

Queensland Reconstruction Authority (2022) South West Regional Resilience Strategy. Available at https://www.qra.qld.gov.au/regional-resilience-strategies/south-west [accessed 5 April 2023]

Quilpie Shire Council (2020) Outback Horizon 2024: Quilpie Shire Economic Development and Tourism Strategy. Available at https://www.rda-ddsw.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Outback-Horizon-2024-Quilpie-Shire-EDTS-FINAL-2020.pdf [accessed 2 April 2023]

Reid RS, Fernández-Giménez ME, Galvin KA (2014) Dynamics and resilience of rangelands and pastoral peoples around the globe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39, 217-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Reisman E (2022) Protecting provenance, abandoning agriculture? Heritage products, industrial ideals and the uprooting of a Spanish turron. Journal of Rural Studies 89, 45-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robinson CJ, James G, Whitehead PJ (2016a) Negotiating Indigenous benefits from payment for ecosystem service (PES) schemes. Global Environmental Change 38, 21-29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Robinson CJ, Renwick AR, May T, Gerrard E, Foley R, Battaglia M, Possingham H, Griggs D, Walker D (2016b) Indigenous benefits and carbon offset schemes: an Australian case study. Environmental Science & Policy 56, 129-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sattler C, Barghusen R, Bredemeier B, Dutilly C, Prager K (2023) Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes. Global Environmental Change 80, 102668.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Scoones, I (1998) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. Insitute of Development Studies (IDS) Working Paper 72. Available at: https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/sustainable-rural-livelihoods-a-framework-for-analysis/ [accessed 14 October 2022]

Southern Downs Regional Council (2022) Economic Development Strategy 2022-2026. Available at https://www.sdrc.qld.gov.au/council/publications/general-publications [accessed 16 June 2023]

Southern Queensland Landscapes (2022) Join us in reimagining the future of the landscapes of southern Queensland: a pathway to flourishing landscapes and healthy communities, version 6.0. Available at https://www.sqlandscapes.org.au/resources [accessed 1 April 2023]

Summers DM, Regan CM, Settre C, Connor JD, O’Connor P, Abbott H, Frizenschaf J, van der Linden L, Lowe A, Hogendoorn K, Groom S, Cavagnaro TR (2021) Current carbon prices do not stack up to much land use change, despite bundled ecosystem service co-benefits. Global Change Biology 27, 2744-2762.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Swette B, Lambin EF (2021) Institutional changes drive land use transitions on rangelands: the case of grazing on public lands in the American West. Global Environmental Change 66, 102220.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

United Nations (2015) Paris Agreement. Available at https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf [accessed 10 June 2020]

UN-DESA (2022) A just green transition: concepts and practice so far. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Policy Brief 141. Available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/PB_141.pdf [accessed 18 January 2024]

Urzedo D, Pedrini S, Hearps C, Dixon K, van Leeuwen S (2022) Indigenous environmental justice through coproduction of mining restoration supply chains in Australia. Restoration Ecology 30(S1), e13748.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ward, A, Clarke, R (2023) Regenerative Agricultural Landscapes – Protecting and restoring native woodlands in Traprock, Queensland. A Landscape Impact Program report. Regen Farmers Mutual, Australia. Available at https://regenfarmersmutual.com/2023/07/08/traprock-landscape-impact-program-project-report/ [accessed 28 August 2023]

Witt GB (2013) Vegetation changes through the eyes of the locals: the ‘artificial wilderness’ in the mulga country of south-west Queensland. The Rangeland Journal 35, 299-314.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yarnold J, Marston G, Mackey B, McVeigh J, Rolfe J, Dale A, Babacan H, Lyons B, Deane F, Newlands M, Plint N, Molyneaux L, Keenan-Jones D, Birch J, Maguire R, Quiggin J, Butler D, Lovelock CE, Doran-Browne N, Ashford G (2022) Decarbonising Queensland: Four pillars toward a resilient and inclusive low-carbon economy. The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia. Available at https://www.ruraleconomies.org.au/media/1404/decarbonising-queensland.pdf [accessed 1 June 2023]