Social return on investment: application for an Indigenous rangelands context
Leah Feuerherdt A E , Stuart Peevor B , Michael Clinch C and Tim Moore A DA Natural Resources Alinytjara Wilurara, Department for Environment and Water, 81 Waymouth St, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
B EIB Consulting, 13 Kalyan Road, Glandore, SA 5037, Australia.
C Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Pastoral, PMB 227 Umuwa via Alice Springs, NT 0872, Australia.
D Australian Integrated Carbon, Level 15/ 25 Bligh St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: leah.feuerherdt2@sa.gov.au
The Rangeland Journal 41(3) 177-183 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ18017
Submitted: 19 February 2018 Accepted: 28 August 2018 Published: 1 November 2018
Abstract
Social Return on Investment (SROI) is an internationally recognised methodology used to measure and value the economic impact of program outcomes. Like a traditional cost-benefit analysis, SROI examines economic outcomes, but also includes the social, environmental and cultural outcomes created by the investment. These outcomes are evaluated against their cost, using financial proxies to estimate their relative economic worth. SROI is particularly valuable in the indigenous natural resource management context, because of the strong ‘value’ or importance of non-economic (particularly cultural) costs and benefits.
The Alinytjara Wilurara Natural Resources Management Board undertook a study of the economic, social, environmental and cultural impacts and benefits of the presence of large feral herbivores in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands, in the far north-west of South Australia. Camels, donkeys and horses present significant impacts for the community in terms of vehicle collisions, community health, damage to infrastructure and water pollution, as well as impacts on sites of cultural and spiritual significance to the local communities. With the annual cost impacts incurred by society caused by large feral herbivores in the APY lands valued at $4.2 million and possible dollar value of those animals valued at $140 000, the study found that there was a net cost impact of ~$4 million from not managing the impact of these animals. The study also found significant cultural impacts of large feral herbivores, such as the fouling of natural springs and other culturally sensitive sites, and further analysis would be required to determine the economic cost of these impacts. Investment models that consider a broad range of costs and benefits are considered necessary for Australian rangelands, particularly Indigenous-owned land.
This paper presents a case study of the development of a ranger program that employs local community members to manage the impacts of large feral herbivores that will provide a net benefit to society of ~$3 million every year, aside from the additional benefits of employment and economic participation. The $3-million net benefit accrues from saving human lives and costs associated with vehicle accidents, and reduced management costs and increased income for pastoral areas of the APY Lands. APY community members, and the APY Pastoral business are core beneficiaries; however, there are several external beneficiaries that this SROI approach recognises including the Motor Accident Commission, Health Departments and South Australian Police. The strongly positive SROI in this case presents an excellent co-investment opportunity for agencies whose core focus is on road safety and health. Importantly, the SROI approach to creation of social value can be implemented in a way that is consistent with stated community aspirations for development.
Additional keywords: feral animals, greenhouse gas, pastoralism.
References
ABS (2013). 3238.0.55.001 Estimates of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, June 2011. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3238.0.55.001June%202011?OpenDocument (accessed 20 July 2017).AWNRMB (2011). Alinytjara Wiluṟara Natural Resource Management Plan. Available at: http://www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au/alinytjara-wilurara/about-us/our-regions-plan (accessed 19 July 2017).
Boguslavskaya, S., and Rozhdestvenskaya, N. (2015). Calculation of social return on investment (SROI) ratio of a local ecological initiative. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives 4, 102–134.
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2014). Best Practice Regulation Guidance Note Value of statistical life. Available at: https://www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/regulation/best-practice-regulation-guidance-note-value-statistical-life (accessed 20 May 2018).
Drucker, A., Edwards, G., and Saalfeld, W. (2010). Economics of camel control in central Australia. The Rangeland Journal 32, 117–127.
| Economics of camel control in central Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jupp, T., Fitzsimons, J., Carr, B., and See, P. (2015). New partnerships for managing large desert landscapes: experiences from the Martu Living Deserts Project. The Rangeland Journal 37, 571–582.
Nicholls, J. (2017). Social return on investment – Development and convergence. Evaluation and Program Planning 64, 127–135.
| Social return on investment – Development and convergence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ninti One (2013). ‘Managing the impacts of feral camels across remote Australia.’ Final report of the Australian Feral Camel Management Project. (Eds M. McGregor, Q. Hart, A. Bubb and R. Davies.) (Ninti One: Alice Springs, NT.) Available at: https://www.nintione.com.au/resource/ManagingImpactsFeralCamels_FinalReportAFCMP.pdf (accessed 20 May 2018)
Pattison-Williams, J. K., Yang, W., Liu, Y., and Gabor, S. (2017). Riparian wetland conservation: A case study of phosphorous and social return on investment in the Black River watershed. Ecosystem Services 26, 400–410.
| Riparian wetland conservation: A case study of phosphorous and social return on investment in the Black River watershed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peevor, S. (2016). ‘Pest Animal Impacts in the A nangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands.’ Final Report. (Natural Resources Alinytjara Wiluṟara: Adelaide.)
Powell, J., and Courtney, P. (2013). ‘An Assessment of the Social Return on Investment of Axes 1 and 3 of the Rural Development Programme for England.’ (CCRI: Gloucestershire, UK.)
Rural Business Solutions (2015). ‘APY Sustainable Pastoral Development Plan.’ (A nangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara: Umuwa.)
SVA (Social Ventures Australia) (2016). ‘Consolidated Report on Indigenous Protected Areas Following Social Return on Investment Analyses.’ (Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet: Canberra.)
The SROI Network (2012). A Guide to Social Return on Investment. Available at: www.thesroinetwork.org (accessed 15 July 2017).
