Sustainable rangeland management in southwest Iran: application of the AHP-TOPSIS approach in ranking livelihood alternatives
Hojatollah Khedrigharibvand A B G , Hossein Azadi A C G , Hosain Bahrami D , Zbelo Tesfamariam A E , Abbas Aghajani Bazzazi F , Philippe De Maeyer A and Frank Witlox A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent B-9000, Belgium.
B Faculty of Natural Resources and Geosciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
C Economics Rural Development, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
D Karoon Watershed Management Office (KWMO), Shahrekord, Iran.
E Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
F Department of Mining Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
G Corresponding author. Email: hojatollah.khedrigharibvand@ugent.be, hossein.azadi@ugent.be
The Rangeland Journal 40(6) 603-614 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ17038
Submitted: 4 May 2017 Accepted: 23 August 2018 Published: 19 October 2018
Abstract
This paper reports the continuation of a line of research exploring livelihood alternatives employing sustainable rangeland management (SRM). Determining appropriate alternatives was a multifaceted task, so multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) techniques were applied to a framework that incorporated livelihood alternatives and their relevant criteria. The livelihood alternatives promote balance between humans, livestock and the rangelands, and the livelihood criteria include livelihood capital and vulnerability contexts, as well as the policies, institutions and processes (PIPs) that affect each livelihood alternative and SRM as a whole. The livelihood alternatives were ranked according to SRM potential, and the most appropriate ones for the Bazoft region of south-west Iran were determined. Through a hierarchical process, nine livelihood alternatives were initially considered as being potentially suitable for SRM, based on the weights of predefined criteria. Using a collaborative process, various groups (local informants, local and regional practitioners and scientists) were asked to develop a list of livelihood criteria in order to identify appropriate livelihood alternatives. Initially, 20 experts were selected for undertaking criteria weighting, and subsequently 10 experts were selected to rank the alternatives for final decision-making. The weights of the criteria were determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank the alternatives. A non-resource-based livelihood was ranked as the most suitable alternative, followed by pastoralism with adaptation of various production systems. The application of the AHP-TOPSIS approach showed how criteria weightings influence the suitability of livelihood alternatives. Thus, the livelihood model enabled visualisation of the consequences of appropriate and/or inappropriate livelihoods for SRM. This study found that even the livelihood alternatives with the lowest values were worthy of consideration in planning for SRM, but they might need to be supported. Finally, the study suggested that the application of decision support models to the identification of users’ livelihood alternatives and to structuring the criteria for adoption of the various alternatives enhances informed decision-making within the context of SRM.
Additional keywords: ecosystem-based adaptation, multiattributes decision-making, non-resource-based livelihoods, mobile pastoralism, mitigation strategies, multilevel stakeholder involvement.
References
Abdelhamid, R., and Eldin, Z. (2012). A decision support system for performance evaluation. IJCA Special Issue on Computational Intelligence Information Security CIIS, 1–8.Ahmadi Mirghaed, F., Souri, B., and Pir Bavaghar, M. (2013). Environmental capability evaluation of land to develop range management plan (Case study: parcel A of Gheshlagh dam watershed). Iranian Journal of Natural Resources 66, 321–334.
Al Maliki, A., Owen, G., and Bruce, D. (2012). Combining AHP and TOPSIS approaches to support site selection for a lead pollution study. Doctoral Dissertation, IACSIT Press.
Almasi, P., and Soltani, S. (2017). Assessment of the climate change impacts on flood frequency (case study: Bazoft Basin, Iran). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 31, 1171–1182.
| Assessment of the climate change impacts on flood frequency (case study: Bazoft Basin, Iran).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Besalatpour, A., Hajabbasi, M. A., Ayoubi, S., and Jalalian, A. (2012). Identification and prioritization of critical sub-basins in a highly mountainous watershed using SWAT model. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 1, 58–63.
Boyd, C. S., and Svejcar, T. J. (2009). Managing complex problems in rangeland ecosystems. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 491–499.
| Managing complex problems in rangeland ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brunson, M. W. (2012). The elusive promise of social-ecological approaches to rangeland management. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 632–637.
| The elusive promise of social-ecological approaches to rangeland management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chang, H. Y., and Chen, S. Y. (2011). Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP-TOPSIS) model to evaluate individual investment performance of retirement planning policy. African Journal of Business Management 5, 10044–100053.
| Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP-TOPSIS) model to evaluate individual investment performance of retirement planning policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Desta, S., and Coppock, D. L. (2004). Pastoralism under pressure: tracking system change in southern Ethiopia. Human Ecology 32, 465–486.
| Pastoralism under pressure: tracking system change in southern Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DFID (2001). ‘Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets, Numbers 1–8.’ (Department for International Development (DFID): London, UK.)
Dong, S. K., and Sherman, R. (2015). Enhancing the resilience of coupled human and natural systems of alpine rangelands on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. The Rangeland Journal 37, i–iii.
| Enhancing the resilience of coupled human and natural systems of alpine rangelands on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dong, S., Wen, L., Liu, S., Zhang, X., Lassoie, J., Yi, S., and Li, Y. (2011). Vulnerability of worldwide pastoralism to global changes and interdisciplinary strategies for sustainable pastoralism. Ecology and Society 16, 10.
| Vulnerability of worldwide pastoralism to global changes and interdisciplinary strategies for sustainable pastoralism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dong, S. K., Lassoie, J., Wen, L., Zhu, L., Li, X. Y., Li, J. P., and Li, Y. Y. (2012). Degradation of rangeland ecosystems in the developing world: tragedy of breaking coupled human–natural systems. International Journal of Sustainable Society 4, 357–371.
| Degradation of rangeland ecosystems in the developing world: tragedy of breaking coupled human–natural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dong, S. K., Kassam, K.-A. S., Tourrand, J. F., and Boone, R. (Eds) (2016). ‘Building Resilience of Human–Natural Systems of Pastoralism in the Developing World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives.’ (Springer: New York.)
Dong, S. K., Wolf, S. A., Lassoie, J. P., Liu, S. L., Long, R. J., Yi, S. L., Jasra, A. W., and Phuntsho, K. (2017). Bridging the gaps between science and policy for the sustainable management of rangeland resources in the developing world. Bioscience 67, 656–663.
| Bridging the gaps between science and policy for the sustainable management of rangeland resources in the developing world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foundjem-Tita, D., Tchoundjeu, Z., Speelman, S., D’Haese, M., Degrande, A., Asaah, E., and Ndoye, O. (2013). Policy and legal frameworks governing trees: incentives or disincentives for smallholder tree planting decisions in Cameroon. Small-scale Forestry 12, 489–505.
| Policy and legal frameworks governing trees: incentives or disincentives for smallholder tree planting decisions in Cameroon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fox, W. P., Ormond, B., and Williams, A. (2016). Ranking terrorist targets using a hybrid AHP-TOPSIS methodology. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 13, 77–93.
| Ranking terrorist targets using a hybrid AHP-TOPSIS methodology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fraser, E. D., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., and McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 78, 114–127.
| Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grice, A. C., and Hodgkinson, K. C. (Eds) (2002). ‘Global Rangelands: Progress and Prospects.’ (CABI: Oxford, UK.)
Hosseininia, G. H., Azadi, H., and Witlox, F. (2013). Sustainable rangeland management: pastoralists’ attitudes toward integrated programs in Iran. Journal of Arid Environments 92, 26–33.
| Sustainable rangeland management: pastoralists’ attitudes toward integrated programs in Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jalalifar, H., Behaadini, M., and Bazzazi, A. A. (2009). The optimum rock bolt support system selection by using AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels 57, 251–266.
Joyce, L. A., Briske, D. D., Brown, J. R., Polley, H. W., McCarl, B. A., and Bailey, D. W. (2013). Climate change and North American rangelands: assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66, 512–528.
| Climate change and North American rangelands: assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kangas, J., Store, R., Leskinen, P., and Mehtätalo, L. (2000). Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilising advanced decision-support tools. Forest Ecology and Management 132, 157–171.
| Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilising advanced decision-support tools.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeney, R. L., Von Winterfeldt, D., and Eppel, T. (1990). Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions. Management Science 36, 1011–1030.
| Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khedrigharibvand, H. (2018). Sustainable rangeland management in Iran: towards a policy-oriented decision-support model. Dissertation, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Khedrigharibvand, H., Azadi, H., and Witlox, F. (2015). Exploring appropriate livelihood alternatives for sustainable rangeland management. The Rangeland Journal 37, 345–356.
| Exploring appropriate livelihood alternatives for sustainable rangeland management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khedrigharibvand, H., Azadi, H., Dashtpagerdi, M. M., Ardali, E. O., and Witlox, F. (2016). Factors affecting sustainable rangeland management: experts’ attitudes towards livelihood cornerstones in the Bazoft region. European Journal of Sustainable Development 5, 169–184.
Khedrigharibvand, H., Azadi, H., Teklemariam, D., Houshyar, E., De Maeyer, P., and Witlox, F. (2017). Livelihood alternatives model for sustainable rangeland management: a review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Environment, Development and Sustainability , .
| Livelihood alternatives model for sustainable rangeland management: a review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, W. E., Bender, H. W., and Shields, D. J. (2000). Stakeholder objectives for public lands: rankings of forest management alternatives. Journal of Environmental Management 58, 21–32.
| Stakeholder objectives for public lands: rankings of forest management alternatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCabe, J. T., Leslie, P. W., and DeLuca, L. (2010). Adopting cultivation to remain pastoralists: the diversification of Maasai livelihoods in northern Tanzania. Human Ecology 38, 321–334.
| Adopting cultivation to remain pastoralists: the diversification of Maasai livelihoods in northern Tanzania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDaniels, T. L., and Roessler, C. (1998). Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecological Economics 27, 299–312.
| Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mendoza, G. A., and Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management 230, 1–22.
| Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Price, J., Silbernagel, J., Miller, N., Swaty, R., White, M., and Nixon, K. (2012). Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios. Ecological Modelling 229, 76–87.
| Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rabie, M. (2016). ‘A Theory of Sustainable Sociocultural and Economic Development.’ (Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.)
Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D., and Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics 59, 406–418.
| An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saaty, T. L. (1980). ‘The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation.’ (McGraw: New York.)
Shang, Z. H., Gibb, M. J., Leiber, F., Ismail, M., Ding, L. M., Guo, X. S., and Long, R. J. (2014). The sustainable development of grassland–livestock systems on the Tibetan plateau: problems, strategies and prospects. The Rangeland Journal 36, 267–296.
| The sustainable development of grassland–livestock systems on the Tibetan plateau: problems, strategies and prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharifiyan Bahraman, A., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A., and Haji Mollahoseini, A. (2014). Analyzing effective factors on rangeland exploitation by using A’WOT (case study: Aq Qala Rangelands, Golestan, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science 4, 159–170.
Shaw, E., and Witt, G. B. (2015). Climate change and adaptive capacity in the Western Australian rangelands: a review of current institutional responses. The Rangeland Journal 37, 331–344.
| Climate change and adaptive capacity in the Western Australian rangelands: a review of current institutional responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., and Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45, 801–813.
| An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soltanmohammadi, H., Osanloo, M., and Bazzazi, A. A. (2010). An analytical approach with a reliable logic and a ranking policy for post-mining land-use determination. Land Use Policy 27, 364–372.
| An analytical approach with a reliable logic and a ranking policy for post-mining land-use determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Speranza, C. I., Wiesmann, U., and Rist, S. (2014). An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics. Global Environmental Change 28, 109–119.
| An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford Smith, M., and Cribb, J. (2009). ‘Dry Times. Blueprint for a Red Land.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Stafford Smith, M., Morton, S. R., and Ash, A. J. (2000). Towards sustainable pastoralism in Australia’s rangelands. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 7, 190–203.
| Towards sustainable pastoralism in Australia’s rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford Smith, M., Moran, M., and Seemann, K. (2008). The ‘viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia. The Rangeland Journal 30, 123–135.
| The ‘viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford Smith, M., Abel, N. O., Walker, B. H., and Chapin, F. S., III (2009). Drylands: coping with uncertainty, thresholds, and changes in state. In: ‘Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World’. (Eds F. S. Chapin, III, G. P. Kofinas and C. Folke.) pp. 171–195. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)
Tache, B. (2008). Pastoralism under stress: resources, institutions and poverty among the Borana Oromo in southern Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.
Tahmasebi, A. (2012). Pastoralism under pressure: vulnerability of pastoral nomads to multiple socio-political and climate stresses; The Shahsevan of Northwest Iran. Doctoral dissertation, Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Bonn, Germany.
Tarawali, S., Herrero, M., Descheemaeker, K., Grings, E., and Blümmel, M. (2011). Pathways for sustainable development of mixed crop livestock systems: taking a livestock and pro-poor approach. Livestock Science 139, 11–21.
| Pathways for sustainable development of mixed crop livestock systems: taking a livestock and pro-poor approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Todaro, M. P., and Smith, S. C. (2014). ‘Economic Development.’ (eBook Pearson: UK.)
Yue, Z. (2011). A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Applied Mathematical Modelling 35, 1926–1936.
| A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
