Dynamics of grazing rights and their impact on mobile cattle herders in Bhutan
Kuenga Namgay A C , Joanne E. Millar B and Rosemary S. Black B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Bhutan; and Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
B School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: kuenga007@gmail.com
The Rangeland Journal 39(1) 97-104 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ16052
Submitted: 31 May 2016 Accepted: 4 January 2017 Published: 27 January 2017
Abstract
Seasonal cattle movements have been an important part of the living cultural heritage in Bhutan for centuries. Herders migrate south every winter to graze their cattle on subtropical pastures and to work in orange orchards. They return north to their villages in spring to grow summer crops. However, the practice of transhumant agropastoralism is under increasing pressure on account of changes in land-use policies, climate change and a declining labour force as youth seek alternative livelihoods. This research investigated the impact of changes in land-use policy, with emphasis on the Land Act 2007, on current and future livelihoods of transhumant herders in Bhutan. During in-depth interviews with 24 transhumant herders and nine livestock advisors, and seven focus-group discussions with 64 participants including herders, downstream residents and development agency personnel, perspectives on this issue were gathered. Findings revealed a lack of herder awareness of changes in land-use policies and minimal consultation of herders during policy development. Confusion and uncertainty about the proposed redistribution of grazing rights and restrictions on herd movements have resulted in confusion and resentment and have created conflicts between upstream and downstream communities. Herders with no current alternatives are concerned about their future livelihoods, whereas others are leaving it to their children to decide their future. It is concluded that the motive behind nationalisation of rangeland is noble and timely, but there are flaws in the redistribution plan. Transhumant agropastoralism is already in decline and there is no need to push towards its end through legislation. Transhumant practices could be left to evolve towards what may be their natural end. Sudden stoppage of inter-district transhumance without offering meaningful alternatives to herders could result in negative environmental and socioeconomic impacts. In future, policy development needs to increasingly embrace science and be based on evidence. A genuine participatory process with citizen engagement could avoid the unintended negative impacts likely to be faced by transhumant herders with marginal land holdings, who depend on this production system for their livelihoods.
Additional keywords: land law, land use, mobility, pastoralism, transhumance, rangeland.
References
Andersen, K. E. (2011). ‘Communal Tenure and the Governance of Common Property Resources in Asia: Lessons from Experiences in Selected Countries.’ Land Tenure Working Paper 20. (Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome.)Behnke, R. H. (2000). Equilibrium and non-equilibrium models of livestock population dynamics in pastoral Africa: their relevance to arctic grazing systems. Rangifer 20, 141–152.
| Equilibrium and non-equilibrium models of livestock population dynamics in pastoral Africa: their relevance to arctic grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Behnke, R. H., and Freudenberger, M. S. (2013). Pastoral land rights and resource governance: overview and recommendations for managing conflicts and strengthening pastoralists’ rights. USAID Issue Brief. Available at: www.usaidlandtenure.net (accessed 3 April 2016).
Bonte, P., Guillaume, H., and Zecchin, F. (1996). Nomads: changing societies and environments. Nature & Resources. UNESCO Quarterly Journal on Environment and Natural Resources Research 32, 2–10.
Boone, R. B., Burnsilver, S. B., Worden, J. S., Galvin, K. A., and Thompson Hobbs, N. (2008). Large-scale movements of large herbivores: livestock following changes in seasonal forage supply. In: ‘Resource Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Foraging’. (Eds H. H. T. Prins and F. van Langevelde.) pp. 187–206. (Springer: Amsterdam.)
Carr-Hill, R., and Peart, E. (2005). ‘The Education of Nomadic Peoples in East Africa.’ (African Development Bank: Tunis; UNESCO, International Institute for Education Planning: Paris.)
Chambers, R. (1997). ‘Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last.’ (Intermediate Technology Publications: London.)
Davies, J., and Bennett, R. (2007). Livelihood adaptation to risk: constraints and opportunities for pastoral development in Ethiopia’s Afar region. The Journal of Development Studies 43, 490–511.
| Livelihood adaptation to risk: constraints and opportunities for pastoral development in Ethiopia’s Afar region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davies, J., Niamir-Fuller, M., Kerven, C., and Bauer, K. (2013). Extensive livestock production in transition. In: ‘Livestock in a Changing Landscape, Volume 1: Drivers, Consequences, and Responses’. (Eds H. A. Mooney, H. Steinfeld and F. Schneider.) pp. 285–308. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Dunn, K. (2005). Doing qualitative research in human geography: interviewing. In: ‘Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography’. (Ed. I. Hay.) pp. 50–82. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Dyer, C. (2001). Nomads and education for all: education for development or domestication? Comparative Education 37, 315–327.
| Nomads and education for all: education for development or domestication?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dyson-Hudson, R., and Dyson-Hudson, N. (1980). Nomadic pastoralism. Annual Review of Anthropology 9, 15–61.
| Nomadic pastoralism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eneyew, A. (2012). Is settling pastoralists a viable livelihood strategy? Implications for policy dialogue. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science 2, 94–102.
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., and Le Febre, S. (2006). Mobility in pastoral systems: dynamic flux or downward trend? International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 13, 341–362.
| Mobility in pastoral systems: dynamic flux or downward trend?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fratkin, E., Roth, E. A., and Nathan, M. A. (1999). When nomads settle: the effects of commoditization, nutritional change, and formal education on Ariaal and Rendille pastoralists. Current Anthropology 40, 729–735.
| When nomads settle: the effects of commoditization, nutritional change, and formal education on Ariaal and Rendille pastoralists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2sbhtVehsA%3D%3D&md5=2ca5b37bcf441d095713a6d5cd4e028bCAS |
Fratkin, E., Roth, E. A., and Nathan, M. A. (2004). Pastoral sedentarization and its effects on children’s diet, health, and growth among Rendille of Northern Kenya. Human Ecology 32, 531–559.
| Pastoral sedentarization and its effects on children’s diet, health, and growth among Rendille of Northern Kenya.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gyeltshen, T., Tshering, N., Tshering, K., and Dorji, S. (2010). ‘Implications of Legislative Reforms Under the Land Act of Bhutan 2007: a Case Study on the Nationalisation of tsamdro and sokshing and its Associated Socioeconomic and Environmental Consequences.’ (Watershed Management Division, Department of Forest and Park Services, Ministry of Agriculture and Forest, Royal Government of Bhutan: Thimphu.)
Hesse, C., and MacGregor, J. (2009). ‘Arid Waste? Reassessing the Value of Dryland Pastoralism.’ (International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): London.)
Kreutzmann, H. (2012). Pastoralism: a way forward or back? In: ‘Pastoral Practices in High Asia: Advances in Asian Human-environmental Research’. (Ed. H. Kreutzmann.) pp. 323–336. (Springer Science+Business Media: Berlin.)
Lesorogol, C. K. (2003). Transforming institutions among pastoralists: inequality and land privatization. American Anthropologist 105, 531–541.
| Transforming institutions among pastoralists: inequality and land privatization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, D. (1995). ‘Herds on the Move: Winds of Change Among Pastoralists in the Himalayas and on the Tibetan Plateau.’ (International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD): Kathmandu.)
Moktan, M. R., Norbu, L., Nirola, H., Dukpa, K., Rai, T. B., and Dorji, R. (2008). Ecological and social aspects of transhumant herding in Bhutan. Mountain Research and Development 28, 41–48.
| Ecological and social aspects of transhumant herding in Bhutan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Namgay, K., Millar, J., Black, R., and Samdup, T. (2013). Transhumant agro-pastoralism in Bhutan: exploring contemporary practices and socio-cultural traditions. Pastoralism: Research Policy & Practice 3, 13.
| Transhumant agro-pastoralism in Bhutan: exploring contemporary practices and socio-cultural traditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Namgay, K., Millar, J. E., Black, R. S., and Samdup, T. (2014). Changes in transhumant agro-pastoralism in Bhutan: a disappearing livelihood? Human Ecology 42, 779–792.
| Changes in transhumant agro-pastoralism in Bhutan: a disappearing livelihood?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Niamir-Fuller, M. (2005). ‘Managing Mobility in African Rangelands: Collective Action and Property Rights for Sustainable Rangeland Management.’ CAPRi Research Brief. (System-Wide Programme on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi)/International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC.)
Norbu, L. (2002). Grazing management in broadleaf forests. Journal of Bhutan Studies 7, 99–129.
Nori, M., and Davies, J. (2007). ‘Change of Wind or Wind of Change? Climate Change, Adaptation and Pastoralism.’ (World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (WISP)/International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN): Nairobi.)
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11, 327–344.
| Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (2002). ‘The Drama of the Commons.’ (National Academies Press: Washington, DC.)
Patton, M. Q. (1990). ‘Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.’ (Sage Publications: London.)
Roder, W. (2002). Grazing management of temperate grassland and fallows. Journal of Bhutan Studies 7, 44–60.
Roder, W., Wangdi, K., Gyamtsho, P., and Dorji, K. (2001). ‘Feeding the Herds: Improving Fodder Resources in Bhutan.’ (ICIMOD: Kathmandu.)
Roder, W., Gratzer, G., and Wangdi, K. (2002). Cattle grazing in the conifer forests of Bhutan. Mountain Research and Development 22, 368–374.
| Cattle grazing in the conifer forests of Bhutan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rohde, R. F., Moleele, N. M., Mphale, M., Allsopp, N., Chanda, R., Hoffman, M. T., Magole, L., and Young, E. (2006). Dynamics of grazing policy and practice: environmental and social impacts in three communal areas of southern Africa. Environmental Science & Policy 9, 302–316.
| Dynamics of grazing policy and practice: environmental and social impacts in three communal areas of southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rota, A., and Sperandini, S. (2009). ‘Livestock and Pastoralists. Livestock Thematic Papers – Tools for Project Design.’ (International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): Rome.)
Roxburgh, C. W., and Pratley, J. E. (2015). The future of food production research in the rangelands: challenges and prospects for research investment, organisation and human resources. The Rangeland Journal 37, 125–138.
| The future of food production research in the rangelands: challenges and prospects for research investment, organisation and human resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scoones, I. (1993). Why are there so many animals? Cattle population dynamics in communal areas of Zimbabwe. In: ‘Range Ecology at Disequilibrium: New Models of Natural Variability and Pastoral Adaptation in African Savannas’. (Eds R. H. Behnke, I. Scoones and C. Kerven.) pp. 62–76. (Overseas Development Institute: London.)
Shaoliang, Y., Ning, W., Peng, L., Qian, W., Fusun, S., Geng, S., and Jianzhong, M. (2007). Changes in livestock migration patterns in a Tibetan-style agropastoral system: a study in the three parallel rivers of Yunnan, China. Mountain Research and Development 27, 138–145.
| Changes in livestock migration patterns in a Tibetan-style agropastoral system: a study in the three parallel rivers of Yunnan, China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sneath, D. (1998). State policy and pasture degradation in inner Asia. Science 281, 1147–1148.
| State policy and pasture degradation in inner Asia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXls1Clu7o%3D&md5=a9f05861c9dbfdfee2ca24bd6c84f59eCAS |
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., and Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349–357.
| Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tshering, P. (2005). ‘The Interaction of Grazing and Competition in the Conifer Forest of Bhutan.’ (University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU): Vienna.)
Ura, K. (2002). The herdsmen’s dilemma. Journal of Bhutan Studies 7, 1–43.
Wangdi, J. (2016). The future of yak farming in Bhutan: policy measures government should adopt. The Rangeland Journal 38, 367–371.
| The future of yak farming in Bhutan: policy measures government should adopt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waters-Bayer, A., and Bayer, W. (1992). The role of livestock in the rural economy. Nomadic Peoples 31, 3–18.
Watson, C. (2010). ‘Gender Issues and Pastoral Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia.’ (UK Department for International Development (DFID) & Government of Ethiopia: Addis Ababa.)
