Exploring appropriate livelihood alternatives for sustainable rangeland management
Hojatollah Khedri Gharibvand A D , Hossein Azadi A B C and Frank Witlox A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Geography, Ghent University, Belgium.
B Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
C Economics Rural Development, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Belgium.
D Corresponding author. Email: Hojatollah.Khedrigharibvand@ugent.be
The Rangeland Journal 37(4) 345-356 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ15027
Submitted: 11 June 2014 Accepted: 13 May 2015 Published: 24 July 2015
Abstract
Rangeland degradation and vulnerability of livelihoods are two major challenges facing pastoralists, rangeland managers and policy-makers in arid and semi-arid areas. There is a need to make holistic informed decisions in order to protect rangelands and sustain livelihoods. Through a comprehensive literature review on rangeland management policies and livelihood strategies of ‘rangeland users’, it is shown how such policies have affected sustainable rangeland management, how strategies to sustain livelihoods have been incomplete and how there has been a lack of a multi-disciplinary approach in acknowledging them. Accordingly, a set of appropriate livelihood alternatives is introduced and, thenceforth, a framework for their evaluation is developed. Supportive strategies for enhancing resilience are discussed as a research and policy-making gap. In this study, the keys to achieve sustainable livelihoods are acknowledged as ‘livelihoods’ resilience’, where livelihoods need to be supported by access to capital, means of coping with the contexts of vulnerability as well as by enhancing policies, institutions and processes. The paper proposes a set of ‘livestock-based livelihoods’ regarding ‘traditional pastoralism’ as well as ‘their mitigation and adaptation’. Moreover, their transformation to ‘commercial pastoralism’, ‘resource-based livelihoods’, ‘alternative livelihoods’ and ‘migration’ strategies is recognised to be employed by rangeland users as useful alternatives in different regions and under future changing conditions including climate change. These strategies embrace thinking on resilience and are supported by strategies that address social and ecological consequences of climate change consisting of mitigation, adaptation and transformation. It is argued that sustainable livelihoods and sustainable rangeland management will be achieved if they are supported by policies that build and facilitate a set of appropriate livelihood alternatives and keep them in a sustainable state rather than being limited to supporting ‘vulnerable livelihoods’. Finally, future directions for analysing and policy-making in selecting the best alternative to achieve sustainable livelihoods are indicated.
Additional keywords: livelihoods’ resilience, rangeland degradation, rangeland users, supportive strategies, sustainable livelihoods, vulnerability.
References
Abolhassani, L., Oesten, G., Rajmis, S., and Azadi, H. (2013). Attitudes of rangeland holders towards sustainable range management in Iran: a case study of the Semnan rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 35, 435–443.| Attitudes of rangeland holders towards sustainable range management in Iran: a case study of the Semnan rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Armitage, D. (2007). Building resilient livelihoods through adaptive co-management: the role of adaptive capacity. In: ‘Adaptive Co-management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-level Governance’. (Eds D. Armitage, F. Berkes and N. C. Doubleday.) pp. 62–82. (UBC Press: Vancouver, Canada.)
Azadi, H., Shahvali, M., Van den Berg, J., and Faghih, N. (2007). Sustainable rangeland management using a multi-fuzzy model: how to deal with heterogeneous experts’ knowledge. Journal of Environmental Management 83, 236–249.
| Sustainable rangeland management using a multi-fuzzy model: how to deal with heterogeneous experts’ knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16887257PubMed |
Bedunah, D. J., and Angerer, J. P. (2012). Rangeland degradation, poverty, and conflict: how can rangeland scientists contribute to effective responses and solutions? Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 606–612.
| Rangeland degradation, poverty, and conflict: how can rangeland scientists contribute to effective responses and solutions?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Behnke, R. H. J. (2008). The drivers of fragmentation in arid and semi-arid landscapes. In: ‘Fragmentation in Semi-arid and Arid Landscapes: Consequences for Human and Natural Systems’. (Eds K. A. Galvin, R. S. Reid, R. H. J. Behnke and N. T. Hobbs.) pp. 305–340. (Springer: Berlin, Germany.)
Davies, J., White, J., Wright, A., Maru, Y., and LaFlamme, M. (2008). Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development. The Rangeland Journal 30, 55–65.
| Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davies, J., Niamir-Fuller, M., Kerven, C., and Bauer, K. (2010). Extensive livestock production in transition: the future of sustainable pastoralism. In: ‘Livestock in a Changing Landscape, Vol. 1: Drivers, Consequences, and Responses’. (Eds H. Steinfeld, H. A. Mooney, F. Schneider and L. E. Neville.) pp. 285–310. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
DFID (2001). ‘Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets, Numbers 1–8.’ (Department for International Development (DFID): London, UK.)
Ding, W., Ren, W., Li, P., Hou, X., Sun, X., Li, X., Xie, J., and Ding, Y. (2014). Evaluation of the livelihood vulnerability of pastoral households in Northern China to natural disasters and climate change. The Rangeland Journal 36, 535–543.
Dong, S., Lassoie, J., Shrestha, K. K., Yan, Z., Sharma, E., and Pariya, D. (2009). Institutional development for sustainable rangeland resource and ecosystem management in mountainous areas of northern Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 994–1003.
| Institutional development for sustainable rangeland resource and ecosystem management in mountainous areas of northern Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18433982PubMed |
Dong, S. K., and Sherman, R. (2015). Enhancing the resilience of coupled human and natural systems of alpine rangelands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The Rangeland Journal 37, i–iii.
| Enhancing the resilience of coupled human and natural systems of alpine rangelands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dong, S. K., Lassoie, J. P., Yan, Z. L., Sharma, E., Shrestha, K. K., and Pariya, D. (2007). Indigenous rangeland resource management in the mountainous areas of northern Nepal: a case study from the Rasuwa District. The Rangeland Journal 29, 149–160.
| Indigenous rangeland resource management in the mountainous areas of northern Nepal: a case study from the Rasuwa District.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis, J. E., and Swift, D. M. (1988). Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management 41, 450–459.
| Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., and Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15, 20.
Geist, H. J., and Lambin, E. F. (2004). Dynamic causal patterns of desertification. Bioscience 54, 817–829.
| Dynamic causal patterns of desertification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gross, J. E., McAllister, R. R. J., Abel, N., Stafford Smith, M., and Maru, Y. (2006). Australian rangelands as complex adaptive systems: a conceptual model and preliminary results. Environmental Modelling & Software 21, 1264–1272.
| Australian rangelands as complex adaptive systems: a conceptual model and preliminary results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herrera, P. M., Davies, J. M., and Baena, P. M. (Eds) (2014). ‘The Governance of Rangelands: Collective Action for Sustainable Pastoralism.’ (Routledge: London, UK.)
Hobbs, N. T., Galvin, K. A., Stokes, C. J., Lackett, J. M., Ashd, A. J., Boonea, R. B., Reid, R. S., and Thornton, P. K. (2008). Fragmentation of rangelands: implications for humans, animals, and landscapes. Global Environmental Change 18, 776–785.
| Fragmentation of rangelands: implications for humans, animals, and landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holechek, J. L. (2013). Global trends in population, energy use and climate: implications for policy development, rangeland management and rangeland users. The Rangeland Journal 35, 117–129.
| Global trends in population, energy use and climate: implications for policy development, rangeland management and rangeland users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holmes, J. (2002). Diversity and change in Australia’s rangelands: a post-productivist transition with a difference? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27, 362–384.
| Diversity and change in Australia’s rangelands: a post-productivist transition with a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Homewood, K. M. (2004). Policy, environment and development in African rangelands. Environmental Science & Policy 7, 125–143.
| Policy, environment and development in African rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hosseininia, G., Azadi, H., Zarafshani, K., Samari, D., and Witlox, F. (2013). Sustainable rangeland management: pastoralists’ attitudes toward integrated programs in Iran. Journal of Arid Environments 92, 26–33.
| Sustainable rangeland management: pastoralists’ attitudes toward integrated programs in Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Joyce, L. A., Briske, D. D., Brown, J. R., Polley, H. W., McCarl, B. A., and Bailey, D. W. (2013). Climate change and North American rangelands: assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies. Rangeland Ecology and Management 66, 512–528.
| Climate change and North American rangelands: assessment of mitigation and adaptation strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Karl, J. W., Herrick, J. E., and Browning, D. M. (2012). A strategy for rangeland management based on best available knowledge and information. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 638–646.
| A strategy for rangeland management based on best available knowledge and information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klein, J. A., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., Wei, H., Changqing, Y., Du Ling, D. D., and Reid, R. S. (2011). A participatory framework for building resilient social-ecological pastoral systems. In: ‘Restoring Community Connections to the Land: Building Resilience through Community-based Rangeland Management in China and Mongolia’. (Ed. M. E. Fernández-Giménez.) pp. 3–36. (CABI: Wallingford, UK.)
LaFlamme, M. (2011). A framework for sustainable rangeland livelihoods. The Rangeland Journal 33, 339–351.
| A framework for sustainable rangeland livelihoods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin, R., Müller, B., Linstädter, A., and Frank, K. (2014). How much climate change can pastoral livelihoods tolerate? Modelling rangeland use and evaluating risk. Global Environmental Change 24, 183–192.
| How much climate change can pastoral livelihoods tolerate? Modelling rangeland use and evaluating risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maru, Y. T., Stafford Smith, M., Sparrow, A., Pinho, P. F., and Dube, O. P. (2014). A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities. Global Environmental Change 28, 337–350.
| A linked vulnerability and resilience framework for adaptation pathways in remote disadvantaged communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller, D. J. (1999). Nomads of the Tibetan Plateau rangelands in western China. 3. Pastoral development and future. Rangelands 21, 17–20.
Mitchell, J. E. (Ed.) (2010). ‘Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Rangeland Management.’ (University of Wyoming, Cooperative Extension Service: Laramie, WY.)
Ngaido, T. (2010). ‘Integrated Rangeland Management Systems.’ (Environment, Production and Technology division, International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC.)
Ngugi, R. K., and Nyariki, D. M. (2005). Rural livelihoods in the arid and semi-arid environments of Kenya: sustainable alternatives and challenges. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 65–71.
| Rural livelihoods in the arid and semi-arid environments of Kenya: sustainable alternatives and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Park, S. E., Marshall, N. A., Jakku, E., Dowd, A. M., Howden, S. M., Mendham, E., and Fleming, A. (2012). Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change 22, 115–126.
| Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rammel, C., Stagl, S., and Wilfing, H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems – a co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics 63, 9–21.
| Managing complex adaptive systems – a co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safriel, U., Adeel, Z., Niemeijer, D., Puigdefabregas, J., White, R., Lal, R., Winslow, M., Ziedler, J., Prince, S., Archer, E., and King, C. (2005). Dryland systems. In: ‘Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Vol. 1’. (Eds R. M. Hassan, R. Scholes and N. Ash.) pp. 623–662. (Island Press: Washington, DC.) Available at: www.maweb.org/documents/document.291.aspx.pdf
Sayre, N. F., de Buys, W., Bestelmeyer, B. T., and Havstad, K. M. (2012). The range problem after a century of rangeland science: new research themes for altered landscapes. Rangeland Ecology and Management 65, 545–552.
| The range problem after a century of rangeland science: new research themes for altered landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scoones, I. (1998). ‘Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: a Framework for Analysis. Working Paper 72.’ (Institute for Development Studies: Brighton, UK.)
Shang, Z. H., Gibb, M. J., Leiber, F., Ismail, M., Ding, L. M., Guo, X. S., and Long, R. J. (2014). The sustainable development of grassland-livestock systems on the Tibetan plateau: problems, strategies and prospects. The Rangeland Journal 36, 267–296.
| The sustainable development of grassland-livestock systems on the Tibetan plateau: problems, strategies and prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sietz, D., Luedeke, M. K. B., and Walther, C. (2011). Categorisation of typical vulnerability patterns in global drylands. Global Environmental Change 21, 431–440.
| Categorisation of typical vulnerability patterns in global drylands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Snyman, H. A. (1998). Dynamics and sustainable utilization of rangeland ecosystems in arid and semi-arid climates of Southern Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 39, 645–666.
| Dynamics and sustainable utilization of rangeland ecosystems in arid and semi-arid climates of Southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford Smith, M. (1996). Management of rangelands: paradigms at their limits. In: ‘The Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems’. (Eds J. Hodgson and A. W. Illius.) pp. 325–357. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK.)
Stafford Smith, M., Abel, N. O., Walker, B. H., and Chapin, F. S., III (2009). Drylands: coping with uncertainty, thresholds, and changes in state. In: ‘Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World’. (Eds F. S. Chapin, III, G. P. Kofinas and C. Folke.) pp. 171–195. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)
Stafford Smith, M., and Cribb, J. (2009). ‘Dry Times. Blueprint for a Red Land.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
Stafford Smith, M., Moran, M., and Seemann, K. (2008). The ‘viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia. The Rangeland Journal 30, 123–135.
| The ‘viability’ and resilience of communities and settlements in desert Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford Smith, M., Morton, S. R., and Ash, A. J. (2000). Towards sustainable pastoralism in Australia’s rangelands. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 7, 190–203.
| Towards sustainable pastoralism in Australia’s rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steinfeld, H., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., McLeod, A., and Honhold, N. (2010). Conclusions and lessons learned. In: ‘Livestock in a Changing Landscape, Volume 1: Drivers, Consequences, and Responses’. (Eds H. Steinfeld, H. A. Mooney, F. Schneider and L. E. Neville) pp. 373–376. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Teague, W. R., Kreuter, U. P., and Fox, W. E. (2010). Economically efficient rangeland management to sustain ecosystem function and livelihoods. In: ‘Range Livestock and Resource Management’. (Ed. V. Squires.) (UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd: Oxford, UK.)
Tsegaye, D., Vedeld, P., and Moe, S. R. (2013). Pastoralists and livelihoods: a case study from northern Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments 91, 138–146.
| Pastoralists and livelihoods: a case study from northern Afar, Ethiopia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9, 5.
