Perceptions of pastoralists and conservation reserve managers on managing feral camels and their impacts
B. Zeng A and G. P. Edwards A BA Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: glenn.edwards@nt.gov.au
The Rangeland Journal 32(1) 63-72 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09036
Submitted: 26 June 2009 Accepted: 14 December 2009 Published: 23 March 2010
Abstract
The perceptions of people living within the current range of feral camels and involved in the pastoral industry and conservation reserve management were assessed through a questionnaire survey. The survey was designed to gauge understanding about the distribution and abundance of feral camels, perspective on camel impacts, and attitudes towards different camel management options. Camels occurred on 74.2% of pastoral properties and 51.4% of reserves that were surveyed. Camels were reported to be increasing on more than 50% of pastoral properties and 88% of reserves and were reported to cause damage on most properties where they occurred. The total monetary value of this damage (including management to mitigate it) was estimated to be $7.15 million per annum on the pastoral estate and $0.37 million per annum across the conservation estate within or on the margins of the camel range. On the pastoral estate, ~$2.40 million of the damage per annum was to infrastructure whereas production losses amounted to $3.42 million per annum. A minority of pastoral properties and reserves reported tangible benefits that accrued from selling camels, eating camels and using camels for natural resource management activities including weed control. The monetary value of the benefit was estimated to be about $0.58 million per annum across the pastoral estate, compared with ~$34 379 per annum across the conservation estate. Pastoralists and reserve managers generally saw a need to control camels and their impacts and currently play an active role in this regard. Both landholder groups favoured culling and commercial use to manage camel impacts but were comfortable using all of the available approaches and willing to consider new ones.
Additional keyword: stakeholder.
Acknowledgments
The work reported in this publication was supported by funding from the Australian Government Natural Heritage Trust through the Desert Knowledge CRC; the views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government or the Desert Knowledge CRC or its participants. We are grateful to Rural Solutions South Australia and the Centralian Land Management Association for their role in delivering the survey to pastoralists. Support from government agencies in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, South Australia, and Queensland was also important for the research. Thanks also to Robin Mills and Phil Thomas for their help in identifying survey lists for pastoral properties. Thanks also to the pastoral and conservation land managers who took part in the survey for their time, cooperation and well considered responses. Lyndee Matthews and Phil Gee provided useful comments on aspects of this work and we thank them sincerely. Thanks also to Keith Saalfeld for producing the map.
Edwards G. P.,
Saalfeld K., Clifford B.
(2004) Population trend of feral camels in the Northern Territory. Australian Wildlife Research 31, 509–517.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 28 July 2008).
Lischka S. A.,
Riley S. J., Rudolph B. A.
(2008) Effects of impact perception on acceptance capacity for white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 502–509.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saalfeld W. K., Edwards G. P.
(2010) Distribution and abundance of the feral camel (Camelus dromedarius) in Australia. The Rangeland Journal 32, 1–9.
Schoener T. W.
(1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122, 240–285.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stokes K. E.,
O’Neill K. P.,
Montgomery W. I.,
Dick J. T. A.,
Maggs C. A., McDonald R. A.
(2006) The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodiversity and Conservation 15, 2829–2852.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vaarzon-Morel P.
(2010) Changes in Aboriginal perceptions of feral camels and of their impacts and management. The Rangeland Journal 32, 73–85.
