Do elephants influence the organisation and function of a South African grassland?
D. M. Parker A C , R. T. F. Bernard A and J. Adendorff BA Wildlife and Reserve Management Research Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, PO Box 94, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, Republic of South Africa.
B South African National Parks, Addo Elephant National Park, PO Box 52, Addo 6105, Republic of South Africa.
C Corresponding author. Email: d.parker@ru.ac.za
The Rangeland Journal 31(4) 395-403 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ08039
Submitted: 5 September 2008 Accepted: 8 July 2009 Published: 27 November 2009
Abstract
The impact of elephants (Loxodonta africana) on woody plants is well known. Elephants can be regarded as drivers of ecosystem functioning by, for example, decreasing woody plant litter accumulation through defoliation. However, their influence within grassland landscapes is, by comparison, very poorly understood. We assessed the influence of elephants on grassland functionality at three separate sites (1, high elephant density, long occupation time; 2, low elephant density, short occupation time; 3, no elephants) in the Addo Elephant National Park, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Using landscape function analysis (LFA) we described the landscape organisation of each site, and, using visual surrogates, calculated indices of landscape stability, infiltration and nutrient cycling. The number of vegetation patches/10 m of transects surveyed was higher at sites where elephant density was high (3 elephants/km2) and where elephants had been present for a long time (>70 years). However, patch size was significantly smaller when elephant density/time of occupation increased, and the proportion of bare soil was higher where elephant density and occupation time were highest. In addition, stability, infiltration and nutrient cycling indices at a site scale were significantly lower where elephants were present at high densities and after a long occupation time. However, bare soil stability was not greatly affected by elephant grazing pressure, implying that a ‘threshold of potential concern’ has not yet arisen. We conclude that the functioning of this grassland landscape is significantly altered when elephants are present. These conclusions highlight the importance of management factors such as containment and the provision of artificial water points which may be compromising the functionality of these landscapes. We recommend ongoing assessments to inform future management decisions.
Additional keywords: landscapes, patch dynamics, rangelands, sustainability.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Rhodes University, the Andrew Mellon Foundation and the NRF for funding this research. Thanks also to SANPARKS (project number. 2007–03–12RBER), and Hugo Bezuidenhout in particular, for facilitating the work. Roy Lubke is thanked for his introduction to and assistance with the method, Bernard Bowles for his assistance in the field, Nicky Lunt and Christopher McQuaid for constructive comments on a previous draft and Dave Tongway for his invaluable input with the data analysis and interpretation. Thank you Dave!
Aguiar M. R., Sala O. E.
(1999) Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 273–277.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 28 June 2009).
Van Aarde R. J.,
Jackson T. P., Ferreira S. M.
(2006) Conservation science and elephant management in southern Africa. South African Journal of Science 102, 385–388.
van de Koppel J.,
Rietkerk M.,
Van Langevelde F.,
Kumar L.,
Klausmeier C. A.,
Fryxell J. M.,
Hearne J. W.,
Van Andel J.,
de Ridder N.,
Skidmore A.,
Stroosnijder L., Prins H. H. T.
(2002) Spatial heterogeneity and irreversible vegetation change in semiarid grazing systems. American Naturalist 159, 209–218.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Western D., Maitumo D.
(2004) Woodland loss and restoration in a savanna park: a 20-year experiment. African Journal of Ecology 42, 111–121.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |