Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

From conflict to collaboration: can better governance systems facilitate the sustainable development of the northern pastoral industry, communities and landscapes?

Allan P. Dale
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia. Email: allan.dale@jcu.edu.au

The Rangeland Journal 40(4) 331-340 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ18010
Submitted: 5 February 2018  Accepted: 11 June 2018   Published: 12 July 2018

Abstract

The past decade has seen several high profile national policy conflicts related to sustainable development beset the northern Australian pastoral industry. Examples include the live cattle export ban, tree clearing legislation in Queensland and significant pastoral sector concerns about exploration and development of coal and gas reserves across the north. Although these are very legitimate cross-societal debates, the high levels of conflict associated with them impact on the willingness of corporate, family and Indigenous farming enterprises in northern Australia to invest in development. They also affect the willingness and capacities of pastoralists to cooperate with governments in various approaches to change management in northern landscapes. In the pursuit of a better pathway that might resolve policy problems while also delivering industry benefit, this paper analyses several high-profile industry and landscape scale conflicts from recent years, teasing out the key features of governance system dysfunction. At the same time, I also look at positive governance developments emerging in related contexts. Drawing on this analysis, I suggest the current system of governance affecting the northern Australian pastoral industry might have much to learn from the application of more evidence rich and engaging systems of co-management. I suggest that moving in this direction, however, would require Australian, state and Northern Territory (NT) governments to genuinely partner the industry, Traditional Owners and other key sectoral interests, leading to long-term vision building, strategy development and delivery partnerships that benefit industry and communities while resolving wider societal concerns.

Additional keywords: land management, pastoral communities, rangeland management, sustainability.


References

Agriculture and Environment Committee (2016). Public briefing – Examination of the Vegetation Management (Reinstatement) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016: Transcript of Proceedings. Queensland Parliament, Brisbane.

Austrade Unlimited (2013). Oil and gas. Available at: https://www.austrade.gov.au/oil-and-gas/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

Ballet, J., Koffi, K. J.-M., and Boniface Komena, K. (2009). Co-management of natural resources in developing countries: The importance of context. Économie Internationale [International Economics] 4, 53–76. Available at: https://www.cairn.info/revue-economie-internationale-2009-4-page-53.htm (accessed 31 January 2018)

Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2003). ‘Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Taghi Farvar, M., Kothari, A., and Renard, Y. (2007). ‘Sharing Power: Learning-by-doing in Co-management of Natural Resources Throughout the World.’ (Earthscan: London.)

Burke, G. (2016). Queensland tree clearing laws fail to pass Parliament in blow to minority Labor Government. ABC News (August 19). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-19/queensland-parliament-tree-clearing-laws-fail-unesco-fears/7765214 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Carlsson, L., and Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75, 65–76.
Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Childs, C., York, A. M., White, D., Schoon, M. L., and Bodner, G. S. (2013). Navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA. Ecology and Society 18, art11.
Navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Coorey, P., and Allard, T. (2011). Live cattle ban to stay. The Sydney Morning Herald (June 8). Available at: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/animals/live-cattle-ban-to-stay-20110607-1fr8b.html (accessed 31 January 2018).

Cotton, M. (2015). Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: A Q-method study of environmental discourses. Environment and Planning A. Economy and Space 47, 1944–1962.
Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: A Q-method study of environmental discourses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Craig, K. J. (2013). Beefing up the standard: The ramifications of Australia’s regulation of live export and suggestions for reform. Macquarie Law Journal 11, 51–76.

Dale, A. P. (2013). ‘Governance challenges for northern Australia.’ The future of northern Australia. (The Cairns Institute: Cairns, Qld.) Available at: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/29868/2/29868_Dale_2013.pdf (accessed 31 January 2018).

Dale, A. P. (2014a). ‘Beyond the North-south Culture Wars: Reconciling Northern Australia’s Past with its Future.’ (Springer: London.)

Dale, A. P. (2014b). Partnerships and prawns: Co-management and the key to success. In: ‘Beyond the North-South Culture Wars: Reconciling Northern Australia’s Past with its Future’. (Ed. A. P. Dale.) pp. 63–71. (Springer: London.)

Dale, A. (2015). North Queensland’s powerful trio will shake up the state. The Conversation (5 May). Available at: http://theconversation.com/north-queenslands-powerful-trio-will-shake-up-the-state-39911 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Dale, A. P., Potts, R., and Harwood, S. (2017). Northern Australia: A contested landscape. In: ‘The Routledge Handbook of Australian Urban and Regional Planning.’ (Eds N. Sipe and K. Vella.) pp. 86–97. (Routledge: London.)

Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education (2013). Australian national greenhouse accounts: Australian land use, land use change and forestry emissions projections to 2030. Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, Canberra. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/publications/australian-land-use-land-use-change-and-forestry-emissions-projections-2030 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (2018). Proposed new vegetation management laws. Available at: https://dnrme.qld.gov.au/land-water/initiatives/vegetation-management-laws

Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines (2004). Pastoral industry survey 2004: Darwin. Available at: http://www.futurebeef.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/2004_Pastoral_Survey_Report-Darwin.pdf

Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation (2013). Statewide landcover and trees study 2004 to 2005 Queensland. Available at: http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/detail.page?fid={D2E18790-0188-4DE0-A002-600790640A8B} (accessed 1 February 2018)

Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation (2016). ‘Land cover change in Queensland 2014–15: Statewide landcover and trees study executive summary.’ (Department of Science, Information Technology & Innovation: Brisbane.) Available at: https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/assets/documents/land/slats-2012-14.pdf (accessed 02 June 2018).

Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation (2017). ‘Land cover change in Queensland 2015–16: Statewide landcover and trees study executive summary.’ (Department of Science, Information Technology & Innovation: Brisbane.) Available at: https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/assets/documents/land/slats-2012-14.pdf (accessed 31 January 2018)

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2015). ‘White paper on the development of northern Australia.’ (Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet: Canberra.) Available at: http://northernaustralia.dpmc.gov.au/ (accessed 31 January 2018)

Desmond, R. (2007). Great Barrier Reef hurt by farming. The Age. Available at: https://www.theage.com.au/news/national/great-barrier-reef-hurt-by-farming/2007/05/31/1180205427882.html (accessed 24 June 2018).

Dias, A. (2016). Fracking moratorium takes effect in NT, Chief Minister Michael Gunner says. ABC News (14 September). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-14/nt-government-introduces-fracking-moratorium/7843502 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Dole, N. (2017). Australian Government’s ban on live exports to Indonesia ‘irrational’, cattle farmers tell court. ABC News (19 July). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-19/cattle-export-class-action-against-federal-government/8723046 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Dunlap, R. E., and Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? The Journal of Social Issues 51, 121–137.
Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

England, P. (2018). Queensland’s new land-clearing laws are all stick and no carrot (but it’s time to do better). The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/queenslands-new-land-clearing-laws-are-all-stick-and-no-carrot-but-its-time-to-do-better-97178

Everingham, S. (2015). Pastoralists warn NT Government over reluctance to enforce access agreements for mining, gas companies. ABC News (23 April). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-23/nt-pastoralists-fight-with-miners-and-gas-companies-over-access/6416026 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Everingham, S., and O’Brien, K. (2015). Northern Territory Cattlemen’s Association calls for mandatory land access agreements between cattlemen and miners. ABC News (20 March). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-20/conflict-between-cattle-producers-and-miners-northern-territory/6335718 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Falk, I. (2001). Challenges facing rural regional Australia in new times. In: ‘Learning to Manage Change: Developing Regional Communities for a Local-Global Millennium’. (Ed. I. Falk.) pp. 3–11. (National Centre for Vocational Education Research: Leabrook, SA.) Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461472 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Fitzpatrick, M., Graham, N., Rihan, D. J., and Reid, D. G. (2011). The burden of proof in co-management and results-based management: the elephant on the deck! ICES Journal of Marine Science 68, 1656–1662.
The burden of proof in co-management and results-based management: the elephant on the deck!Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flint, J. (2018). Live sheep export debate: WA issues challenge to Federal Government. Perth Now (April 15). Available at: https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/animals/live-sheep-export-debate-wa-issues-challenge-to-federal-government-ng-b88804617z

Galvin, K. A., Reid, R. S., Behnke, R. H. J., and Thompson Hobbs, N. (Eds) (2008). ‘Fragmentation in Semi-arid and Arid Landscapes: Consequences for Human and Natural Systems.’ (Springer: Dordrecht.)

Goodwin, S. (2016). Get to know the shale gas business, pastoralists told. Farm Online National (29 March). Available at: http://www.farmonline.com.au/story/3816930/get-to-know-the-shale-gas-business-pastoralists-told/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

James Cook University and CSIRO (2013). ‘Land Tenure in Northern Australia: Opportunities and Challenges for Investment.’ (CSIRO: Brisbane.)

Kelley, P. (2011). Co-management holds promise of sustainable fisheries worldwide. UWNews (5 January). Available at: http://www.washington.edu/news/2011/01/05/co-management-holds-promise-of-sustainable-fisheries-worldwide/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

Keniry, J. (2011). Appendix F: Keniry live export review, 2003. In: ‘Independent Review of Australia’s Livestock Export Trade’. pp. 118–121. (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Canberra.) Available at: http://www.agriculture.gov.au/Style%20Library/Images/DAFF/__data/assets/pdffile/0007/2401693/indep-review-aust-livestock-export-trade.pdf (accessed 31 January 2018)

MacBean, N. (2010). Divisions run deep in Qld Wild Rivers debate. ABC News (15 December). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-04-20/divisions-run-deep-in-qld-wild-rivers-debate/1656948 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Martin, P. V., and Hine, D. W. (2017). Using behavioural science to improve Australia’s environmental regulation. The Rangeland Journal 39, 551–561.
Using behavioural science to improve Australia’s environmental regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matiru, V. (2000). ‘Conflict and Natural Resource Management.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome.) Available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/21572-0d9d4b43a56ac49880557f4ebaa3534e3.pdf (accessed 31 January 2018)

Miele, M., Blokhuis, H., Bennett, R., and Bock, B. (2013). Changes in farming and in stakeholders’ concern for animal welfare. In: ‘Improving Farm Animal Welfare’. (Eds H. Blokhuis, M. Miele, I. Veissier and B. Jones.) pp. 19–47. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen.)

Pepper, R., Hart, B. T., Jones, D., Smith, R., Prioestly, B., Anderson, A. (2018). Final report: Scientific inquiry into hydraulic fracturing in the Northern Territory. Available at: https://frackinginquiry.nt.gov.au/inquiry-reports/final-report (accessed 4 June 2018).

Petrie, C. (2016). ‘Live Export: A Chronology.’ (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.) Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1617/Chronology/LiveExport (accessed 31 January 2018)

Productivity Commission (2003) ‘Impacts of Native Vegetation and Biodiversity Regulations. Productivity Commission Draft Report.’ (Australian Government: Canberra.)

Queensland Farmers’ Federation (2017). Queensland Government releases reef regulations discussion paper. Available at: https://www.qff.org.au/media-releases/queensland-government-releases-reef-regulations-discussion-paper/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

Queensland Government (2017). Progress report on government election commitments: June 2017. Available at: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/Documents/TableOffice/TabledPapers/2017/5517T1291.pdf (accessed 31 January 2018).

Raish, C., and McSweeney, A. (2001). Livestock ranching and traditional culture in northern New Mexico. Natural Resources Journal 41, 713–730.

Risgeth, J. A. (2003). Sami reindeer management in Norway: Modernization challenges and conflicting strategies. Reflections upon the co-management alternative. In: ‘Indigenous Peoples: Resource Management and Global Rights’. (Eds S. Jentoft, H. Minde and R. Nilsen.) pp. 229–247. (Eburon Uitgeverij B.V.: Delft.)

Senate Select Committee on Animal Welfare (2013). Education, Employment and Workplace Relations References Committee. Effectiveness of the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy: Interim report. (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra). Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/ Senate/Education_Employment_and_Workplace_Relations/Naplan13/~/media/Committees/Senate/committee/eet_ctte/naplan_2013/interim_report/report.ashx (accessed 31 January 2018).

Siegle, J. (2005). Governance strategies to remedy the natural resource curse. International Social Science Journal 57, 45–55.
Governance strategies to remedy the natural resource curse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, M., and Die, D. (Eds) (1999). ‘Northern Prawn Fishery: 1997 and 1998 Fisheries Assessment Report.’ (Australian Fisheries and Management Authority: Canberra.)

Tooth, G. (1999). Queensland: Beautiful one day, burning the next. PM Archive (6 December). Available at: http://www.abc.net.au/pm/stories/s71371.htm (accessed 31 January 2018).

Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M., Yoxtheimer, D., and Abad, J. D. (2013). Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340, 1235009.
Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wong, C. M. L., and Lockie, S. (2018). Sociology, risk and the environment: a material-semiotic approach. Journal of Risk Research , .
Sociology, risk and the environment: a material-semiotic approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |