Ecosystem services from tropical savannas: economic opportunities through payments for environmental services
Romy Greiner A B D , Iain Gordon C and Chris Cocklin BA River Consulting, 68 Wellington Street, Townsville, Qld 4812, Australia.
B James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
C CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: romy.greiner@riverconsulting.com.au
The Rangeland Journal 31(1) 51-59 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ08067
Submitted: 3 December 2008 Accepted: 2 February 2009 Published: 26 March 2009
Abstract
Economic activity in the tropical savannas of northern Australia, like rangeland regions across the globe, has traditionally been based on primary production – predominantly cattle grazing and mining. More recently, northern Australia has experienced an increase in the extent of the conservation estate and in tourism and associated service industries. These trends demonstrate an increasing recognition of the multifunctional character of the tropical savannas and business opportunities additional to the traditional primary production systems. The increasing recognition of the multifunctionality of landscapes and increasing demand for ecosystem services provides potential opportunities for economic returns for businesses and communities in the tropical savannas through the delivery of environmental services to sustain the region’s natural capital. This paper pursues two objectives. Firstly, it sets out to provide conceptual clarity around the notions of ecosystem services, environmental services and payments for environmental services (PES). Secondly, we sketch some of the opportunities associated with PES, with particular reference to the Gulf of Carpentaria in northern Australia.
Additional keywords: ecosystem services, environmental services, multifunctionality, natural capital, tropical savannas.
Acknowledgements
This paper was prepared, in part, with funding provided by the Northern Gulf Resource Management Group with resources provided under the Natural Heritage Trust II. We thank two anonymous referees and Daniel Gregg for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
Baylis K.,
Peplow S.,
Rausser G., Simon L.
(2008) Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: a comparison. Ecological Economics 65, 753–764.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 10/01/2009).
Boisvert R. N., Blandford D.
(2006) Multifunctionality and non-trade concerns: implications for future agricultural policy in Asia. Paddy and Water Environment 4, 223–228.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 30/11/2008).
Engel S.,
Paiola S., Wunder S.
(2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65, 663–674.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 13/07/2007).
Fisher B.,
Turner R. K., Morling P.
(2008) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68, 643–653.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 30/11/2008).
Norgaard R. B., Jin L.
(2008) Trade and the governance of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 66, 638–652.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(Accessed 30/11/08).
Wunder S.,
Engel S., Pagiola S.
(2008) Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65, 834–852.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wünscher T.,
Engel S., Wunder S.
(2008) Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecological Economics 65, 822–833.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |