Augmenting rangeland condition monitoring with drones: potential for carbon farming projects to support widespread ecosystem assessment
Samuel Shumack A * , Gregor Sanders A , Michael Rooney A and Andrew O’Reilly-Nugent AA
Abstract
Large areas of the Australian rangelands are used for pastoral agriculture. Rangeland condition monitoring commonly operates at one of the following two scales: (1) detailed but spatially restricted on-ground surveys of farm and ecosystem condition, or (2) regional and national analyses using data from earth observation satellites such as Landsat or Sentinel-2. This study aimed to assess the potential of drone-based data collection from carbon farming projects to augment rangeland condition monitoring. The widespread adoption of carbon farming in Australian rangelands and the increasing use of drones to validate vegetation maps could provide an opportunity to bridge these two scales. Range condition was defined in terms of plant species composition, woody vegetation structure, and ground cover, focusing on indicators relevant to both carbon sequestration and broader ecosystem function. Existing maps of vegetation structure were combined with on-ground surveys and drone data collected at the scale of an individual rangeland property. Drone-mounted sensors produced ultra-high-resolution imagery (~2 cm GSD) and three-dimensional point clouds. This combination of imagery and three-dimensional data enabled measurement of condition indicators such as tree size distributions, canopy area and ground layer coverage. This case study of drone-based ecological profiling after land management change demonstrated that monitoring programmes of carbon farming projects can be leveraged for detailed and accurate investigation of ecosystem condition. Significant differences were found in canopy and ground layer elements between vegetation communities and land-use histories. These findings have highlighted the value of repurposing carbon farming project data for holistic landscape condition assessment. The value and importance of in situ vegetation structural measurements is further emphasised by the contrasting unsuitability of national-scale satellite remote-sensing products for precise property-level mapping. The potential for the growing in situ dataset to support both property-scale decision-making and understanding of the broader ecological effects of woody vegetation regrowth is discussed.
Keywords: Australian rangelands, drones, ecological profiling, land management change, mesoscale monitoring, UAVs, vegetation condition, canopy cover.
References
Allred BW, Bestelmeyer BT, Boyd CS, Brown C, Davies KW, Duniway MC, Ellsworth LM, Erickson TA, Fuhlendorf SD, Griffiths TV, Jansen V, Jones MO, Karl J, Knight A, Maestas JD, Maynard JJ, McCord SE, Naugle NE, Starns HD, Twidwell D, Uden DR (2021) Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12, 841-849.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Amputu V, Knox N, Braun A, Heshmati S, Retzlaff R, Röder A, Tielbörger K (2023) Unmanned aerial systems accurately map rangeland condition indicators in a dryland savannah. Ecological Informatics 75, 102007.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Anderson V, Hodgkinson K, Grice A (1996) The influence of recent grazing pressure and landscape position on grass recruitment in a semi-arid woodland of eastern Australia. The Rangeland Journal 18(1), 3-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Baumber A, Waters C, Cross R, Metternicht G, Simpson M (2020) Carbon farming for resilient rangelands: people, paddocks and policy. The Rangeland Journal 42(5), 293-307.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beutel TS, Trevithick R, Scarth P, Tindall D (2019) VegMachine.net. online land cover analysis for the Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 41(4), 355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Booth DT, Tueller PT (2003) Rangeland monitoring using remote sensing. Arid Land Research and Management 17(4), 455-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brown R (1985) The growth and survival of young mulga (Acacia aneura F.Muell) trees under different levels of grazing. The Rangeland Journal 7(2), 143-148.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bush Heritage Australia & Climate Friendly (2022) AfN-METHOD-NV-10: Integrated Vegetation Condition Method. In ‘Method catalogue’. (Accounting for Nature). Available at https://www.accountingfornature.org/method-catalogue
Clean Energy Regulator (2024) ACCU Project and Contract Register. Available at https://cer.gov.au/markets/reports-and-data/accu-project-and-contract-register [retrieved 3 March 2024]
Clean Energy Regulator (2019) Guidelines on stratification, evidence and records or projects under the Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest and Native Forest from Managed Regrowth methods. https://cer.gov.au/document/guidelines-stratification-evidence-and-records-hir-and-nfmr
Cohn JS, Lunt ID, Bradstock RA, Hua Q, McDonald S (2013) Demographic patterns of a widespread long‐lived tree are associated with rainfall and disturbances along rainfall gradients in SE Australia. Ecology and Evolution 3(7), 2169-2182.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cunliffe AM, Brazier RE, Anderson K (2016) Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Remote Sensing of Environment 183, 129-143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cunliffe AM, Anderson K, Boschetti F, Brazier RE, Graham HA, Myers-Smith IH, Astor T, Boer MM, Calvo LG, Clark PE, Cramer MD, Encinas-Lara MS, Escarzaga SM, Fernández-Guisuraga JM, Fisher AG, Gdulová K, Gillespie BM, Griebel A, Hanan NP, et al. (2022) Global application of an unoccupied aerial vehicle photogrammetry protocol for predicting aboveground biomass in non‐forest ecosystems. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 8(1), 57-71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Department of Environment and Science (2021) Spatial BioCondition: Vegetation condition map for Queensland. Queensland Government, Brisbane. https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/230019/spatial-biocondition-vegetation-condition-map-for-queensland.pdf
DJI (2023) DJI Terra. Shenzhen: DJI. Available at https://www.dji.com/au/dji-terra/info
Fensham RJ, Powell O, Horne J (2011) Rail survey plans to remote sensing: vegetation change in the Mulga Lands of eastern Australia and its implications for land use. The Rangeland Journal 33(3), 229-238.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fisher A, Scarth P, Armston J, Danaher T (2018) Relating foliage and crown projective cover in Australian tree stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 259, 39-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fisher A, Armston J, Goodwin N, Scarth P (2020) Modelling canopy gap probability, foliage projective cover and crown projective cover from airborne lidar metrics in Australian forests and woodlands. Remote Sensing of Environment 237, 111520.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Friedel MH (1997) Discontinuous change in arid woodland and grassland vegetation along gradients of cattle grazing in central Australia. Journal of Arid Environments 37(1), 145-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gill T, Johansen K, Phinn S, Trevithick R, Scarth P, Armston J (2017) A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38(3), 679-705.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gillan JK, Karl JW, van Leeuwen WJD (2020) Integrating drone imagery with existing rangeland monitoring programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192(5), 269.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Guerschman JP, Scarth PF, McVicar TR, Renzullo LJ, Malthus TJ, Stewart JB, Rickards JE, Trevithick R (2015) Assessing the effects of site heterogeneity and soil properties when unmixing photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil fractions from Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment 161, 12-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harrington G (1979) The effects of feral goats and sheep on the shrub populations in a semi-arid woodland. The Rangeland Journal 1(4), 334-345.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Howard J, Gugger S (2020) Fastai: a layered API for deep learning. Information 11(2), 108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jones P, Burrows WH (1994) State and transition models for rangelands. 13. A state and transition model for the mulga zone of south-west Queensland. Tropical Grasslands 28, 279-283.
| Google Scholar |
Karan M, Liddell M, Prober SM, Arndt S, Beringer J, Boer M, Cleverly J, Eamus D, Grace P, Van Gorsel E, Hero J-M, Hutley L, Macfarlane C, Metcalfe D, Meyer W, Pendall E, Sebastian A, Wardlaw T (2016) The Australian SuperSite Network: a continental, long-term terrestrial ecosystem observatory. Science of The Total Environment 568, 1263-1274.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Kattenborn T, Eichel J, Fassnacht FE (2019) Convolutional Neural Networks enable efficient, accurate and fine-grained segmentation of plant species and communities from high-resolution UAV imagery. Scientific Reports 9, 17656.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Landsberg J, James CD, Morton SR, Müller WJ, Stol J (2003) Abundance and composition of plant species along grazing gradients in Australian rangelands. Journal of Applied Ecology 40(6), 1008-1024.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Levick SR, Whiteside T, Loewensteiner DA, Rudge M, Bartolo R (2021) Leveraging TLS as a calibration and validation tool for MLS and ULS mapping of savanna structure and biomass at landscape-scales. Remote Sensing 13(2), 257.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Liao Z, Van Dijk AIJM, He B, Larraondo PR, Scarth PF (2020) Woody vegetation cover, height and biomass at 25-m resolution across Australia derived from multiple site, airborne and satellite observations. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 93, 102209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ludwig JA, Tongway DJ, Hindley N (2024) Can simple, on-ground vegetation and soil measures reliably indicate the health of rangelands? An application in Australia’s semi-arid woodlands. The Rangeland Journal 45(6), 235-245.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lyons MB, Keith DA, Phinn SR, Mason TJ, Elith J (2018) A comparison of resampling methods for remote sensing classification and accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 208, 145-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Melville B, Fisher A, Lucieer A (2019) Ultra-high spatial resolution fractional vegetation cover from unmanned aerial multispectral imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 78, 14-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Novelly PE, Watson IW, Thomas PWE, Duckett NJ (2008) The Western Australian Rangeland Monitoring System (WARMS) - operating a regional scale monitoring system. The Rangeland Journal 30(3), 271-281.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Peeters PJ, Butler DW (2014) ‘Mulga – Regrowth benefits management guideline.’ (Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts: Brisbane, Qld, Australia) Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/68191/mulga-management-guideline.pdf
Penman J, Green C, Olofsson P, Foody GM (2016) ‘Integration of remote-sensing and ground-based observations for estimation of emissions and removals of greenhouse gases in forests.’ (Global Forest Observations Initiative) Available at https://www.reddcompass.org/mgd/resources/GFOI-MGD-3.1-en.pdf
Popescu SC, Wynne RH, Nelson RF (2002) Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar: local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 37(1–3), 71-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Rango A, Laliberte A, Steele C, Herrick JE, Bestelmeyer B, Schmugge T, Roanhorse A, Jenkins V (2006) Using unmanned aerial vehicles for rangelands: current applications and future potentials. Environmental Practice 8(3), 159-168.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rango A, Laliberte A, Herrick JE, Winters C, Havstad K, Steele C, Browning D (2009) Unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing for rangeland assessment, monitoring, and management. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 3(1), 033542.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Retallack A, Finlayson G, Ostendorf B, Clarke K, Lewis M (2023) Remote sensing for monitoring rangeland condition: current status and development of methods. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 19, 100285.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In ‘Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015’. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Ed. N Nassir) pp. 234–241. (Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland) 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
Rudge MLM, Levick SR, Bartolo RE, Erskine PD (2021) Modelling the diameter distribution of savanna trees with drone-based LiDAR. Remote Sensing 13, 1266.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rudge MLM, Levick SR, Bartolo RE, Erskine PD (2022) Developing landscape-scale forest restoration targets that embrace spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology 37(7), 1747-1760.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sankey TT, Leonard JM, Moore MM (2019) Unmanned aerial vehicle-based rangeland monitoring: examining a century of vegetation changes. Rangeland Ecology & Management 72(5), 858-863.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sankey JB, Sankey TT, Li J, Ravi S, Wang G, Caster J, Kasprak A (2021) Quantifying plant-soil-nutrient dynamics in rangelands: fusion of UAV hyperspectral-LiDAR, UAV multispectral-photogrammetry, and ground-based LiDAR-digital photography in a shrub-encroached desert grassland. Remote Sensing of Environment 253, 112223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Shumack S, Fisher A, Hesse P (2021) Refining medium resolution fractional cover for arid Australia to detect vegetation dynamics and wind erosion susceptibility on longitudinal dunes. Remote Sensing of Environment 265, 112647.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sinclair R, Facelli JM (2018) Ninety years of change on the TGB Osborn Vegetation Reserve, Koonamore: a unique research opportunity. The Rangeland Journal 41(3), 185-187.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sivanandam P, Turner D (2023) ‘Drone Data Collection Protocol using DJI Matrice 300 RTK: Imagery and Lidar.’ (The Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network) Available at https://www.tern.org.au/wp-content/uploads/20230829_drone_data_collection.pdf
Sparrow BD, Foulkes JN, Wardle GM, Leitch EJ, Caddy-Retalic S, van Leeuwen SJ, Tokmakoff A, Thurgate NY, Guerin GR, Lowe AJ (2020) A vegetation and soil survey method for surveillance monitoring of rangeland environments. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8, 157.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Standards Reference Group SERA (2021) ‘National Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration in Australia. Edition 2.2.’ (Society for Ecological Restoration Australasia) Available at https://www.seraustralasia.com/standards/NationalStandards2_2.pdf
Statewide Landcover and Trees Study Queensland Landsat Series (2023) ‘Open Data Portal.’ (Department of Environment, Science and Innovation) Available at https://www.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/statewide-landcover-and-trees-study-queensland-landsat-series
Stewart AJ, Robinson C, Corley IA, Ortiz A, Ferres JML, Banerjee A (2022) TorchGeo. In ‘Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems’. pp. 1–12. (ACM: New York, NY, USA) 10.1145/3557915.3560953
Taugourdeau S, Diedhiou A, Fassinou C, Bossoukpe M, Diatta O, N’Goran A, Auderbert A, Ndiaye O, Diouf AA, Tagesson T, Fensholt R, Faye E (2022) Estimating herbaceous aboveground biomass in Sahelian rangelands using Structure from Motion data collected on the ground and by UAV. Ecology and Evolution 12(5), 8867.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Travers SK, Eldridge DJ, Val J, Oliver I (2019) Rabbits and livestock grazing alter the structure and composition of mid-storey plants in a wooded dryland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 277, 53-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Westoby M (1979) Elements of a theory of vegetation dynamics in arid rangelands. Israel Journal of Botany 28(3–4), 169-194.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Witt GB, Harrington RA, Page MJ (2009) Is ‘vegetation thickening’ occurring in Queensland’s mulga lands? A 50-year aerial photographic analysis. Australian Journal of Botany 57(7), 572-582.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Witt GB, Noël MV, Bird MI, Beeton RJS, Menzies NW (2011) Carbon sequestration and biodiversity restoration potential of semi-arid mulga lands of Australia interpreted from long-term grazing exclosures. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 141(1–2), 108-118.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhang W, Qi J, Wan P, Wang H, Xie D, Wang X, Yan G (2016) An easy-to-use airborne lidar data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sensing 8(6), 501.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
