Can we benchmark annual ground cover maintenance?
Terrence S. Beutel
A * and F. Patrick Graz A
A Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia.
The Rangeland Journal 44(6) 333-342 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ22041
Submitted: 10 October 2022 Accepted: 10 April 2023 Published: 27 April 2023
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Rangeland Society. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
The capacity for rangeland stakeholders, including land managers, financiers and regulators, to regularly assess impacts of management practices on grazed landscapes has potential benefits. This paper describes the development of ground cover maintenance (GCM) spatial layers for a large study area in the catchment of the Great Barrier Reef in Queensland, Australia. GCM layers are an experimental product designed to benchmark the direction and strength of annual change in remotely sensed total ground cover (ΔTGC). This was achieved by predicting ΔTGC per pixel in a multivariate model, then using the quantile of the observed ΔTGC within its modelled prediction interval to benchmark observed ΔTGC. Under this approach, pixels with higher quantiles are those with a more positive annual observed ΔTGC after rainfall and other predictors in the multivariate model are taken into account. We then mapped these quantiles annually (2011–2021) across the study area and the annual spatial distribution of these quantiles is what we call the GCM layers. We identified two important issues to be addressed in future iterations of this work, namely, the potentially confounding impact of fire on GCM layers and their interpretation, and a need for more predictive skill in the underlying random forest model. Because management variables were not part of the underlying multivariate model but management practices can affect ΔTGC, we were interested in whether patterns in the mapped GCM values correlated with any known management practices or management-practice effects in the study area. We tested this idea on three datasets. In one, we compared GCM values from 12 well managed and 12 poorly managed grazing sites, finding no significant differences between the two groups. Another analysis looked at the relationship between grazing land condition and cumulative GCM values at two sets of sites (n = 110 and n = 189). Land condition and cumulative GCM values correlated significantly, although in only one of these data sets. Overall, we conclude that the developed GCM layers require further refinement to fit their desired purpose, but have potential to produce a number of benefits if current limitations can be addressed.
Keywords: grazing management, grazing pressure, landscape ecology, rangeland management, remote sensing.
References
Andrefouet S, Bindschadler R, Brown de Colstoun E, Choate M, Chomentowski W, Christopherson J, Doorn B, Hall DK, Holifield C, Howard S, Kranenburg C (2003) ‘Preliminary assessment of the value of Landsat-7 ETM+ data following scan line corrector malfunction.’ (US Geological Survey, EROS Data Center: Sioux Falls, SD, USA)| Crossref |
Bastin, G, Scarth, P, Chewings, V, Sparrow, A, Denham, R, Schmidt, M, O’Reagain, P, Shepherd, R, and Abbott, B (2012). Separating grazing and rainfall effects at regional scale using remote sensing imagery: a dynamic reference-cover method. Remote Sensing of Environment 121, 443–457.
| Separating grazing and rainfall effects at regional scale using remote sensing imagery: a dynamic reference-cover method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bestelmeyer, BT, Brown, JR, Havstad, KM, Alexander, R, Chavez, G, and Herrick, JE (2003). Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56, 114–126.
| Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beutel, TS, Trevithick, R, Scarth, P, and Tindall, D (2019). VegMachine.net. online land cover analysis for the Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 41, 355–362.
| VegMachine.net. online land cover analysis for the Australian rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beutel, TS, Shepherd, R, Karfs, RA, Abbott, BN, Eyre, T, Hall, TJ, and Barbi, E (2021). Is ground cover a useful indicator of grazing land condition. The Rangeland Journal 43, 55–64.
| Is ground cover a useful indicator of grazing land condition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bruno I (2014) Benchmarking. In ‘Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research’. (Ed. AC Michalos) (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands)
| Crossref |
Burrell, AL, Evans, JP, and Liu, Y (2017). Detecting dryland degradation using time series segmentation and residual trend analysis (TSS-RESTREND). Remote Sensing of Environment 197, 43–57.
| Detecting dryland degradation using time series segmentation and residual trend analysis (TSS-RESTREND).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carroll C, Waters D, Ellis R, McCosker K, Gongora M, Chinn C, Gale K (2013) Great Barrier reef paddock to reef monitoring and modelling program. In ‘MODSIM2013, 20th international congress on modelling and simulation’, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Chilcott CR, Paton CJ, Quirk MF, McCallum BS (2003) ‘Grazing land management education package workshop notes – Burnett.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia Limited: Sydney, NSW, Australia)
DES (2014) Seasonal ground cover - Landsat, JRSRP algorithm, Australia Coverage. (Version 1.0.0.) Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) dataset. Available at https://portal.tern.org.au/seasonal-ground-cover-australia-coverage/22022
Donohue, RJ, Mokany, K, McVicar, TR, and O'Grady, AP (2022). Identifying management‐driven dynamics in vegetation cover: applying the Compere framework to Cooper Creek, Australia. Ecosphere 13, e4006.
| Identifying management‐driven dynamics in vegetation cover: applying the Compere framework to Cooper Creek, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Evans, J, and Geerken, R (2004). Discrimination between climate and human-induced dryland degradation. Journal of Arid Environments 57, 535–554.
| Discrimination between climate and human-induced dryland degradation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Genuer, R, Poggi, J-M, and Tuleau-Malot, C (2015). VSURF: An R package for variable selection using random forests. The R Journal 7, 19–33.
| VSURF: An R package for variable selection using random forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gill, T, Johansen, K, Phinn, S, Trevithick, R, Scarth, P, and Armston, J (2017). A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38, 679–705.
| A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goodwin, NR, and Collett, LJ (2014). Development of an automated method for mapping fire history captured in Landsat TM and ETM+ time series across Queensland, Australia. Remote Sensing of Environment 148, 206–221.
| Development of an automated method for mapping fire history captured in Landsat TM and ETM+ time series across Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grundy, MJ, Rossel, RAV, Searle, RD, Wilson, PL, Chen, C, and Gregory, LJ (2015). Soil and landscape grid of Australia. Soil Research 53, 835–844.
| Soil and landscape grid of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt, LP, McIvor, JG, Grice, AC, and Bray, SG (2014). Principles and guidelines for managing cattle grazing in the grazing lands of northern Australia: stocking rates, pasture resting, prescribed fire, paddock size and water points – a review. The Rangeland Journal 36, 105–119.
| Principles and guidelines for managing cattle grazing in the grazing lands of northern Australia: stocking rates, pasture resting, prescribed fire, paddock size and water points – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lesmeister C (2017) ‘Mastering machine learning with R.’ (Packt Publishing: Birmingham, UK)
Liaw, A, and Wiener, M (2002). Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22.
McIvor J (2012) ‘Sustainable management of the Burdekin grazing lands – a technical guide of options for stocking rate management, pasture spelling, infrastructure development and prescribed burning to optimise animal production, profitability, land condition and water quality outcomes.’ (State of Queensland, Australia)
Neldner VJ, Butler DW, Guymer GP (2019) ‘Queensland’s regional ecosystems: building a maintaining a biodiversity inventory, planning framework and information system for Queensland, Version 2.0.’ (Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Department of Environment and Science: Brisbane, Qld, Australia)
Probst, P, Wright, MN, and Boulesteix, A-L (2019). Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9, e1301.
| Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
QLUMP (2017) ‘Queensland land use mapping program.’ (Remote Sensing Centre, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government: Qld, Australia)
Roberts, D, Wilford, J, and Ghattas, O (2019). Exposed soil and mineral map of the Australian continent revealing the land at its barest. Nature Communications 10, 5297.
| Exposed soil and mineral map of the Australian continent revealing the land at its barest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford Smith, DM, McKeon, GM, Watson, IW, Henry, BK, Stone, GS, Hall, WB, and Howden, SM (2007). Learning from episodes of degradation and recovery in variable Australian rangelands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 20690–20695.
| Learning from episodes of degradation and recovery in variable Australian rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stone, G, Pozza, RD, Carter, J, and McKeon, G (2019). Long Paddock: climate risk and grazing information for Australian rangelands and grazing communities. The Rangeland Journal 41, 225–232.
| Long Paddock: climate risk and grazing information for Australian rangelands and grazing communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Verbesselt, J, Hyndman, R, Newnham, G, and Culvenor, D (2010). Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sensing of Environment 114, 106–115.
| Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilford, J (2011). Weathering intensity map of the Australian continent. AusGeo News 101, 1–5.
Wilford JR, Lindsay J, Basak S (2020) Multiscale topographic position image of the Australia continent. In ‘Exploring for the future: Extended Abstracts’. (Eds K Czarnota, I Roach, S Abbott, M Haynes, N Kositcin, A Ray, E Slatter) pp. 1–4. (Geoscience Australia)
Zhang, B, and Carter, J (2018). FORAGE – An online system for generating and delivering property-scale decision support information for grazing land and environmental management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 150, 302–311.
| FORAGE – An online system for generating and delivering property-scale decision support information for grazing land and environmental management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang, H, Zimmerman, J, Nettleton, D, and Nordman, DJ (2019). Random forest prediction intervals. The American Statistician 74, 392–406.
| Random forest prediction intervals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
