Building cultural capital in drought adaptation: lessons from discourse analysis
Gillian Paxton A B CA Queensland Department of Environment and Science, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Qld 4102, Australia.
B School of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
C Email: Gillian.L.Paxton@gmail.com
The Rangeland Journal 43(3) 101-108 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ20077
Submitted: 30 July 2020 Accepted: 12 February 2021 Published: 6 March 2021
Journal Compilation © Australian Rangeland Society 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
As governments and primary industries work to build the climate resilience of Australian agriculture, individual producers are often called upon to implement strategies to become more adaptive in the face of drought. These strategies include infrastructural changes to agricultural businesses, changes to practices, and the adoption of new skills and knowledge. The transition towards greater drought adaptiveness will also demand broader cultural shifts in the way that drought is defined and approached as an issue facing primary producers. This paper presents the results of a discourse analysis conducted as part of social research exploring the cultural barriers to drought preparedness within the Queensland Government’s Drought and Climate Adaptation Program (DCAP). Focusing on media and government accounts, the analysis found two different ways of framing drought and its management in Queensland agriculture. The first, which is dominant in media accounts, emphasises the disruptive power of drought, presenting it as a profound difficulty for producers that is managed using endurance, hope and ingenuity. This frame adopts highly evocative discursive strategies oriented towards mobilising community sentiment and support for producers. The second, which is less prominent overall, downplays drought’s disruptive power and counters the emotionality of the adversity discourse by presenting drought as a neutral business risk that can be managed using rational planning skills and scientific knowledge. In discussing these two frames, this paper suggests strategies whereby drought adaptation frames might be made more powerful using more meaningful and emotive narratives that showcase it as a vital practice for ensuring agricultural livelihoods and rural futures in a changing climate.
Keywords: agriculture, Queensland, drought, climate adaptation, culture, cultural capital, framing, communication, discourse, primary producers.
References
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., and Waters, J. (2011). Resilience. In: ‘The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society’. (Eds J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard and D. Schlosberg.) pp. 696–710. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., and O’Brien, K. (2013). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change 3, 112–117.
| Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aldunce, P., Beilin, R., Howden, M., and Handmer, J. (2015). Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: practitioners’ frames and practices. Global Environmental Change 30, 1–11.
| Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: practitioners’ frames and practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson, D. (2014). ‘Endurance.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Bartel, R. (2014). Vernacular knowledge and environmental law: cause and cure for regulatory failure. Local Environment 19, 891–914.
| Vernacular knowledge and environmental law: cause and cure for regulatory failure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: ‘Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education’. (Ed. J. G. Richardson.) pp. 46–58. (Greedword Press: Connecticut, USA.)
Bowd, K. (2012). Considering the consequences: Australian country newspapers and news impact on communities. Rural Society 21, 126–135.
| Considering the consequences: Australian country newspapers and news impact on communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christoff, P. (2013). Climate discourse complexes, National Climate Regimes and Australian Climate Policy. The Australian Journal of Politics and History 59, 349–367.
| Climate discourse complexes, National Climate Regimes and Australian Climate Policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cockfield, G. (2013). Risk, expertise, and drought management. In: ‘Drought, Risk Management, and Policy Decision Making under Uncertainty’. (Eds L. C. Botterill and G. Cockfield.) pp. 17–28. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.)
Fleming, A., Vanclay, F., Hiller, C., and Wilson, S. (2014). Challenging conflicting discourses of climate change. Climatic Change 127, 407–418.
| Challenging conflicting discourses of climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fleming, A., Mason, C., and Paxton, G. (2018). Discourses of technology, ageing and participation. Palgrave Communications 4, 54.
| Discourses of technology, ageing and participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Flora, C. B., Flora, J. L., and Gasteyer, S. P. (2016). ‘Rural Communities: Legacy + Change.’ 5th edn. (Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA.)
Foss, A. W. (2018). Climate change and political discourse: analysis of energy efficiency and conservation block grants in Dallas-Fort Worth. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61, 230–248.
| Climate change and political discourse: analysis of energy efficiency and conservation block grants in Dallas-Fort Worth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freeman, J., Hess, K., and Waller, L. (2017). Making inroads: a critical examination of the ABC’s commitment to local news. Media International Australia 165, 117–130.
| Making inroads: a critical examination of the ABC’s commitment to local news.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hajer, M., and Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7, 175–184.
| A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Highmore, B. (2016). ‘Culture.’ (Routledge: London, UK.)
Howden, M., Schroeter, S., Crimp, S., and Hanigan, I. (2014). The changing roles of science in managing Australian droughts: an agricultural perspective. Weather and Climate Extremes 3, 80–89.
| The changing roles of science in managing Australian droughts: an agricultural perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones, R. (2017). ‘Slow Catastrophes: Living with Drought in Australia.’ (Monash University Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Marshall, N., and Stokes, C. J. (2014). Identifying thresholds and barriers to adaptation through measuring climate sensitivity and capacity to change in an Australian primary industry. Climatic Change 126, 399–411.
| Identifying thresholds and barriers to adaptation through measuring climate sensitivity and capacity to change in an Australian primary industry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51, 12–23.
| Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oppermann, E. (2011). The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK Climate Impacts Programme: De-scribing the problematization of adaptation. Climate and Development 3, 71–85.
| The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK Climate Impacts Programme: De-scribing the problematization of adaptation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid, R., and Botterill, L. C. (2013). The multiple meanings of ‘resilience’: an overview of the literature. Australian Journal of Public Administration 72, 31–40.
| The multiple meanings of ‘resilience’: an overview of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rickards, L., Neale, T., and Kearnes, M. (2017). Australia’s national climate: learning to adapt? Geographical Research 55, 469–476.
| Australia’s national climate: learning to adapt?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schipper, E. L., and Langston, L. (2015). A comparative overview of resilience measurement frameworks: analyzing indicators and approaches. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 422.
Schlosberg, D., Collins, L. B., and Niemeyer, S. (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics 26, 413–437.
| Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shtob, D. A. (2019). Remembering the future: natural disaster, place, and symbolic survival. Rural Sociology 84, 123–147.
| Remembering the future: natural disaster, place, and symbolic survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor, B., Wallington, T., Heyenga, S., and Harman, B. (2014). Urban growth and climate adaptation in Australia: divergent discourses and implications for policy-making. Urban Studies 51, 3–21.
| Urban growth and climate adaptation in Australia: divergent discourses and implications for policy-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
