Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Custodianship of wildlife on private land to support conservation – an Australian model

George Wilson A B D , Melanie Edwards B and Neil Byron C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Australian Wildlife Services, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

C University of Canberra, Institute of Applied Ecology, ACT 2617, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: george.wilson@anu.edu.au

The Rangeland Journal 42(5) 309-321 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ20039
Submitted: 13 May 2020  Accepted: 31 August 2020   Published: 8 October 2020

Journal Compilation © Australian Rangeland Society 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC

Abstract

A large proportion of the world’s extinctions have occurred in Australia, and threatened species lists continue to grow, notwithstanding government and philanthropic efforts. Most losses have been on private land, so relying on national parks and reserves is not enough to reverse trends and meet Australia’s responsibilities. This paper proposes a model that could increase abundance and distribution of Australia’s biodiversity, while providing financial incentives to private landholders to do so. It addresses the question, can landholder management of wildlife, and a form of private ownership, remedy shortfalls in government funding for biodiversity conservation and the resulting consequences of vast biodiversity losses? Landholders currently invest in propagating introduced livestock species, but they are prevented by current regulations from investing in a similar manner in threatened Australian native species. Market-based incentives could increase the distribution and abundance of species on private land and help protect the habitat of other biodiversity. The enabling changes would be contentious to some people but are consistent with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s Sustainable Use policy. Different versions of wildlife privatisation have been successfully applied internationally: there is urgency for Australia to draw on these experiences and develop its own model to encourage and support wildlife on private freehold land. The model proposed in this paper focuses on: identifying locally overabundant populations or captive-bred populations as sources of supply; finding landholders and philanthropists who would like to have custodianship of species; enabling entrepreneurs to respond to demand; and bringing the two together where there is scope for a market-based sharing economy. Encouraging wildlife custodianship on private freehold land would be mutually beneficial, as it would not only result in an increase in biodiversity, but the economic value of wildlife could provide an income to landholders as well as enhancing Australia’s conservation system.

Keywords: biodiversity, conservation, habitat restoration, land clearing, private land, sustainable harvesting, threatened species, wildlife custodianship.


References

Ashley, C., and Barnes, J. (1996). ‘Wildlife Use for Economic Gain: The Potential for Wildlife to Contribute to Development in Namibia.’ (Directorate of Environmental Affairs Ministry of Environment and Tourism: Windhoek, Namibia.)

Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (2011). Land Use and Management Information for Australia. Available at: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump (accessed 8 September 2020).

Australian Government (2015). ‘Threatened Species Strategy.’ (Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Australian National University (2015). Mulligans Flat – Goorooyarroo Woodland Experiment. Available at: www.mfgowoodlandexperiment.org.au (accessed 8 September 2020).

Batson, W. G., Gordon, I. J., Fletcher, D. B., and Manning, A. D. (2015). Translocation tactics: a framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 52, 1598–1607.
Translocation tactics: a framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boyer, A. (2019). Fish stocks update. Fish 27, 10–11.

Child, B., Musengezi, J., Parent, G. D., and Child, G. (2012). The economics and institutional economics of wildlife on private land in Africa. Pastoralism 2, 18.
The economics and institutional economics of wildlife on private land in Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cloete, P. C., Bothma, J. du P., du Toit, J. G., and Van Rooyen, J. (2016). Buying and selling wildlife. In: ‘Game Ranch Management’. (Eds J. du P. Bothma and J. G. du Toit.) pp. 641–665. (Van Shaik: Pretoria, South Africa.)

Cooney, R. (2009). ‘Landholder Collaboration in Wildlife Management: Models for Landholders to Share Benefits of Kangaroo Management.’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Cooney, R., Chapple, R., Doornbos, S., and Jackson, S. (2010). ‘Australian Native Mammals as Pets: A Feasibility Study into Conservation, Welfare and Industry Aspects.’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Cooney, R., Kasterine, A., MacMillan, D., Milledge, S., Nossal, K., Roe, D., and St Sas-Rolfes, M. (2015). ‘The Trade in Wildlife: A Framework to Improve Biodiversity and Livelihood Outcomes.’ (International Trade Centre: Geneva, Switzerland.)

Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review 57, 347–359.

Dickman, C. (2020). More than One Billion Animals Killed in Australian Bushfires. Available at: https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/01/08/australian-bushfires-more-than-one-billion-animals-impacted.html (accessed 8 September 2020).

Du Toit, J. G. (2016). Conservancies. In: ‘Game Ranch Management’. (Eds J. du P. Bothma and J. G. du Toit.) pp. 22–26. (Van Schaik: Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.)

Figgis, P., Humann, D., and Looker, M. (2005). Conservation on private land in Australia. Parks 15, 19–29.

Hanemann, M., and Young, M. (2020). Water rights reform and water marketing: Australia vs the US West. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36, 108–131.
Water rights reform and water marketing: Australia vs the US West.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Havemann, T., Schuster, D., Leigh-Bell, J., Negra, C., and Levonen, A. (2016). ‘Levering Ecosystems, A Business-Focused Perspective on How Debt Supports Investments in Ecosystem Services.’ (Credit Suisse: Zürich, Switzerland.)

Hayward, M. (2011). Using the IUCN Red List to determine effective conservation strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation 20, 2563–2573.
Using the IUCN Red List to determine effective conservation strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huwyler, F., Käppeli, J., and Tobin, J. (2016). ‘Conservation Finance; From Niche to Mainstream: The Building of an Institutional Asset Class.’ (Credit Suisse Group AG and McKinsey Center for Business and Environment: Zürich, Switzerland.)

Innes, J., Burns, B., Sanders, A., and Hayward, M. W. (2015). The impact of private sanctuary networks on reintroduction programmes in Australia and New Zealand. In: ‘Advances in Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna’. (Eds D. P. Armstrong, M. W. Hayward, D. Moro and P. J. Seddon.) pp. 185–200. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission (2013). ‘Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations. Ver. 1.0.’ (International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission: Gland, Switzerland.)

International Union for the Conservation of Nature (1963). ‘Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources in Modern African States.’ (International Union for the Conservation of Nature: Morges, Switzerland.)

International Union for the Conservation of Nature (2000). ‘IUCN Policy Statement on Sustainable Use of Wild Living Resources.’ (Species Survival Commission: Amman, Jordan.)

Johnson, C. (2006). ‘Australia’s Mammal Extinctions: a 50000 Year History.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Lueck, D. (1989). The economic nature of wildlife law. The Journal of Legal Studies 18, 291–324.
The economic nature of wildlife law.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macaulay, L. (2016). The role of wildlife-associated recreation in private land use and conservation: Providing the missing baseline. Land Use Policy 58, 218–233.
The role of wildlife-associated recreation in private land use and conservation: Providing the missing baseline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Menkhorst, P. (2008). Hunted, marooned, re-introduced, contracepted: a history of Koala management in Victoria. Australian Zoologist 34, 73–92.

National Native Title Tribunal (2009). The Blue Bay Mud Decision. Available at: www.nntt.gov.au/ (accessed 8 September 2020).

National Native Title Tribunal (2020). Native Title Determined Outcome. Available at: http://www.nntt.gov.au/assistance/Geospatial/Pages/Maps.aspx (accessed 8 September 2020).

Navarro, L. M., and Pereira, H. M. (2015). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. In: ‘Rewilding European Landscapes’. (Eds L. M. Navarro and H. M. Pereira.) pp. 3–23. (Springer: Cham, Switzerland.)

Newsome, D., Moore, S. A., and Dowling, R. K. (2002). ‘Natural Area Tourism: Ecology Impacts and Management.’ (Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK.)

NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (2014). Reintroducing Locally Extinct Mammals. Available at: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/threatened-species/saving-our-species-program/threatened-species-conservation/featured-projects/reintroducing-locally-extinct-mammals (accessed 8 September 2020).

NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (2019). Wildlife Licenses. Available at: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/licences-and-permits/wildlife-licences (accessed 8 September 2020).

Office of Environment and Heritage (2018). ‘Saving our Species Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Guidelines for Conservation Projects.’ (Office of Environment and Heritage: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)

Office of Environment and Heritage (2019). ‘Translocation Operational Policy.’ (Office of Environment and Heritage: Sydney, NSW, Australia.)

Radford, J., Driscoll, D., Anderson, A., Wardle, G., Waryszaj, P., Green, P., and Klassen, M., Cosham, J., Vale, T., Mariette, M., et al. (2019). An Open Letter to the Prime Minister from 248 Concerned Scientists. Available at: https://www.envirolawsopenletter.com.au/ (accessed 8 September 2020).

Ringma, J., Legge, S., Woinarski, J., Radford, J., Wintle, B., and Bode, M. (2018). Australia’s mammal fauna requires a strategic and enhanced network of predator-free havens. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2, 410–411.
Australia’s mammal fauna requires a strategic and enhanced network of predator-free havens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sherwood, S., Grafton, Q., McDougall, T. J., England, M., Zhao, G., Bird, M., Davis, T., Westoby, M., Rohling, E. J., Head, L., et al. (2020). An Open Letter on Australian Bushfires and Climate: Urgent Need for Deep Cuts in Carbon Emissions. Available at: https://laureatebushfiresclimate.wordpress.com/ (accessed 8 September 2020).

Shwiff, S. A., Sweeney, S. J., Elser, J. L., Miller, R. S., Farnsworth, M. L., Nol, P., Shwiff, S. S., and Anderson, A. M. (2016). A benefit-cost analysis decision framework for mitigation of disease transmission at the wildlife–livestock interface. Human–Wildlife Interactions 10, 91–102.

Stolton, S., Redford, K. H.,and Dudley, N. (2014). ‘The Futures of Privately Protected Areas.’ (International Union for the Conservation of Nature: Gland, Switzerland.)

Whisson, D. A., and Ashman, K. R. (2020). When an iconic native animal is overabundant: the koala in southern Australia. Conservation Science and Practice 2, e188.
When an iconic native animal is overabundant: the koala in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wikiquote contributors (2019). Jack Lang 1876–1975. Available at: https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Jack_Lang&oldid=2670995 (accessed 8 September 2020).

Wilson, G. (2004). Integrating kangaroos (Macropus sp.) and other wildlife with agriculture in Australia. Game and Wildlife Science 21, 843–851.

Wilson, G., and Edwards, M. (2008). Native wildlife on rangelands to minimize methane and produce lower-emission meat: kangaroos versus livestock. Conservation Letters 1, 119–128.
Native wildlife on rangelands to minimize methane and produce lower-emission meat: kangaroos versus livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson, G. R., and Edwards, M. (2019). Professional kangaroo population control leads to better animal welfare, conservation outcomes and avoids waste. Australian Zoologist 40, 181–202.
Professional kangaroo population control leads to better animal welfare, conservation outcomes and avoids waste.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson, G., and Smetana, P. (1997). ‘Sustainable Economic Use of Native Australian Birds and Reptiles: Can Controlled Trade Improve Conservation of Species?’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT, Australia.)

Wilson, G. R., Hayward, M. W., and Wilson, C. (2017). Market-based incentives and private ownership of wildlife to remedy shortfalls in government funding for conservation. Conservation Letters 10, 485–492.
Market-based incentives and private ownership of wildlife to remedy shortfalls in government funding for conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson, G., Hayward, M. W., and Wilson, C. (2018). Trials of market-based incentives to conserve wildlife. In: ‘Conservation through Sustainable Use of Wildlife Conference’. (Eds G. Baxter, N. Finch and P. Murray.) pp. 206–213. (University of Queensland: Brisbane, Qld, Australia.)

Wintle, B. A., Cadenhead, N. C. R., Morgain, R. A., Legge, S. M., Bekessy, S. A., Cantele, M., Possingham, H. P., Watson, J. E. M., Maron, M., Keith, D. A., Garnett, S. T., Woinarski, J. C. Z., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2019). Spending to save: what will it cost to halt Australia’s extinction crisis? Conservation Letters 12, e12682.
Spending to save: what will it cost to halt Australia’s extinction crisis?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woinarski, J., Burbidge, A., and Harrison, P. (2014). ‘The Action Plan for Australian Mammals 2012.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.)

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Braby, M. F., Burbidge, A. A., Coates, D., Garnett, S. T., Fensham, R. J., Legge, S. M., McKenzie, N. L., Silcock, J. L., and Murphy, B. P. (2019). Reading the black book: the number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia. Biological Conservation 239, 108261.
Reading the black book: the number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |