Designing a payment for ecosystem services scheme, the practical obstacles for implementation in arid and semiarid rangelands
Emad Zakeri A , Seyed Alireza Mousavi A B and Hamidreza Karimzadeh A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
B Corresponding author. Email: sarmousavi@iut.ac.ir
The Rangeland Journal - https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ19072
Submitted: 24 September 2019 Accepted: 30 October 2020 Published online: 22 December 2020
Abstract
Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes are an innovative solution to reduce environmental degradation. However, most existing experience with PES implementation is related to the agricultural, forestry and marine sectors, and the application of PES in rangelands is limited. Although a PES could be an option to reduce rangeland degradation, there is no specific framework or experience for its implementation in Iran. Financial resources for funding the scheme are important, although funding by itself is not sufficient, and details are important in designing a successful PES system. This study aimed to design and introduce the framework of a PES scheme based on field surveys, information collection and analysis emphasising soil and water conservation functions, and identification and discussion of the challenges and obstacles facing implementation of the designed framework. After delineating the vegetation types on rangeland ecosystems, their current ecological condition was considered the baseline, and minimum and maximum payments were considered, equal to the livestock reduction compensation and the total value of the increased ecosystem services as a result of PES implementation respectively. Results suggest designing the practical steps of PES schemes is complicated despite the concept’s simplicity, and a lack of clear property rights can increase complexity and multiply the costs. Considering different socioeconomic and ecological contexts, and the detailed framework in all the processes of identification and investigation, development, pilot testing, and project operation can increase the effectiveness of PES schemes. Our findings appear useful for policy-making to balance utilisation pressure in natural areas, not only in Iran, but also in many arid and semiarid rangelands elsewhere.
Keywords: environmental degradation, incentive-based mechanisms, Iran, operationalising payments for ecosystem services, pastoralists, policy design.
References
Alizadeh, A. (2011). ‘Principles of applied hydrology.’ (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad: Mashhad, Iran.)Arnoldus, H. M. J. (1980) An approximation of the rainfall factor in the universal soil loss equation. In: ‘Assessment of Erosion.’ (Eds. M. De Boodt, and D. Gabriels). pp. 127–132. (Wiley: Chichester, UK)
Batista, P. V. G., Silva, M. L. N., Silva, B. P. C., Curi, N., Bueno, I. T., Júnior, F. W. A., Davies, J., and Quinton, J. (2017). Modelling spatially distributed soil losses and sediment yield in the upper Grande River Basin-Brazil. Catena 157, 139–150.
| Modelling spatially distributed soil losses and sediment yield in the upper Grande River Basin-Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Binet, T., Failler, P., Chavance, P. N., and Mayif, M. A. (2013). First international payment for marine ecosystem services: the case of the Banc d’Arguin National Park, Mauritania. Global Environmental Change 23, 1434–1443.
| First international payment for marine ecosystem services: the case of the Banc d’Arguin National Park, Mauritania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brodie, J. (2014). Dredging the Great Barrier Reef: use and misuse of science. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 142, 1–3.
| Dredging the Great Barrier Reef: use and misuse of science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brouwer, R., Tesfaye, A., and Pauw, P. (2011). Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services. Environmental Conservation 38, 380–392.
| Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CBI (2019). Central Bank of Iran. Available at: https://www.cbi.ir (accessed 12 April 2019).
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). ‘Applied hydrology.’ (Tata McGraw Hill Publications: New Delhi, India.)
Cranford, M. (2014). ‘Positive incentives for ecosystem services.’ (The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE): London, UK)
de Snoo, G. R., Herzon, I., Staats, H., Burton, R. J. F., Schindler, S., van Dijk, J., Lokhorst, A. M., Bullock, J. M., Lobley, M., Wrbka, T., Schwarz, G., and Musters, C. J. M. (2013). Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter. Conservation Letters 6, 66–72.
| Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dutilly-Diane, C., McCarthy, N., Turkelboom, F., Bruggeman, A., Tiedemann, J., Street, K., and Serra, G. (2007). ‘Could payments for environmental services improve rangeland management in Central Asia, West Asia and North Africa?’ (CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights: Washington, D.C.)
Engel, S. (2016). The devil in the detail: a practical guide on designing payments for environmental services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 131–177.
| The devil in the detail: a practical guide on designing payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engel, S., and Schaefer, M. (2013). Ecosystem services – a useful concept for addressing water challenges? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 696–707.
| Ecosystem services – a useful concept for addressing water challenges?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engel, S., Palmer, C., and Pfaff, A. (2013). On the endogeneity of resource comanagement: theory and evidence from Indonesia. Land Economics 89, 308–329.
| On the endogeneity of resource comanagement: theory and evidence from Indonesia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eskandari, N., Alizadeh, A., and Mahdavi, F. (2008). ‘Range management policies in Iran.’ (Pooneh Publication: Tehran, Iran) [In Persian]
Fripp, E. (2014). ‘Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): a practical guide to assessing the feasibility of PES projects.’ (CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia)
Ganasri, B. P., and Ramesh, H. (2016). Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE model using remote sensing and GIS – a case study of Nethravathi Basin. Geoscience Frontiers 7, 953–961.
| Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE model using remote sensing and GIS – a case study of Nethravathi Basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., and Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 1209–1218.
| The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goodhue, R. E., McCarthy, N., and di Gregorio, M. (2005). Fuzzy access: modeling grazing rights in sub-Saharan Africa. In: ‘Property rights, risk, and livestock development in Africa.’ (International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, D.C.)
Hanley, N., and White, B. (2013). Incentivizing the provision of ecosystem services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 7, 299–331.
| Incentivizing the provision of ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
He, J., and Sikor, T. (2015). Notions of justice in payments for ecosystem services: insights from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program in Yunnan Province. Land Use Policy 43, 207–216.
| Notions of justice in payments for ecosystem services: insights from China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program in Yunnan Province.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jain, M. K., and Kothyari, U. C. (2000). Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. Hydrological Sciences Journal 45, 771–786.
| Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jack, B. K., Kousky, C., and Sims, K. R. (2008). Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 9465–9470.
| Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keenan, R. J., Pozza, G., and Fitzsimons, J. A. (2019). Ecosystem services in environmental policy: barriers and opportunities for increased adoption. Ecosystem Services 38, 100943.
| Ecosystem services in environmental policy: barriers and opportunities for increased adoption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kemkes, R. J., Farley, J., and Koliba, C. J. (2010). Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 69, 2069–2074.
| Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klemz, C., Dacol, K. C., Zimerman, P., Nayara, J., Veiga, F., Pagiola, S., von Glehn, H. C. Q., and Taffarello, D. (2013). ‘Experiences of payments for environmental services in Brazil Secretariat for the Environment.’ (World Bank, SMA/CBRN: São Paulo, Brazil)
Matzdorf, B., Sattler, C., and Engel, S. (2013). Institutional frameworks and governance structures of PES schemes. Forest Policy and Economics 37, 57–64.
| Institutional frameworks and governance structures of PES schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mbak, E. (2010). Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) scheme implemented in the Cidanau Watershed, Indonesia. In ‘The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity’. Available at: TEEBweb.org (accessed 10 November 2020).
McCool, D. K., Brown, L. C., Foster, G. R., Mutchler, C. K., and Meyer, L. D. (1987). Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 30, 1387–1396.
| Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). ‘Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water.’ (Island Press: Washington, D.C.)
Morgan, R. P. C. (2009). ‘Soil erosion and conservation.’ (Wiley-Blackwell: Australia)
Mozaffarian, V. (1996). ‘A dictionary of Iranian plant names.’ (Farhang Moaser: Tehran, Iran)
Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J. M., and Braña, J. (2008). Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics 65, 725–736.
| Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: analysis, negotiations and results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Muradian, R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., Adaman, F., Aguilar, B., Agarwal, B., Corbera, E., Ezzine, , de Blas, D., Farley, J., and Froger, G. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions. Conservation Letters 6, 274–279.
| Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Naeem, S., Ingram, J. C., Varga, A., Agardy, T., Barten, P., Bennett, G., Bloomgarden, E., Bremer, L. L., Burkill, P., and Cattau, M. (2015). Get the science right when paying for nature’s services. Science 347, 1206–1207.
| Get the science right when paying for nature’s services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25766222PubMed |
North Khorasan Natural Resources Bureau (2016). ‘Comparative investigation of soil erosion in North Khorasan.’ (Sanabad Delta Sazeh: Bojnurd, Iran). [In Persian]
Parker, K. W. (1954). Application of ecology in the determination of range condition and trend. Journal of Range Management 7, 14–23.
| Application of ecology in the determination of range condition and trend.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paudyal, K., Baral, H., Bhandari, S., and Keenan, R. J. (2018). Design considerations in supporting payments for ecosystem services from community-managed forests in Nepal. Ecosystem Services 30, 61–72.
| Design considerations in supporting payments for ecosystem services from community-managed forests in Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Renard, K. G., and Freimund, J. R. (1994). Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. Journal of Hydrology 157, 287–306.
| Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Salzman, J. (2005). Creating markets for ecosystem services: notes from the field. NYU Law Review 80, 870–961.
Sattler, C., and Matzdorf, B. (2013). PES in a nutshell: From definitions and origins to PES in practice – approaches, design process and innovative aspects. Ecosystem Services 6, 2–11.
| PES in a nutshell: From definitions and origins to PES in practice – approaches, design process and innovative aspects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sattler, C., Trampnau, S., Schomers, S., Meyer, C., and Matzdorf, B. (2013). Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success? Ecosystem Services 6, 31–45.
| Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith, S., Rowcroft, P., Everard, M., Couldrick, L., Reed, M., Rogers, H., Quick, T., Eves, C., and White, C. (2013). ‘Payments for ecosystem services: a best practice guide.’ (Defra: London.)
Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69, 1245–1252.
| An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waage, S., Mulder, I., ten Kate, K., Scherr, S., Prince Roberts, J., Hawn, A., Hamilton, K., Bayon, R., and Carroll, N. (2007). Investing in the future: an assessment of private sector demand for engaging in markets & payments for ecosystem services. PESAL papers Series. Available at: http://imap.cciforum.org/pdfs/private%20sector%20demand%20for%20engaging%20in%20mkts%20and%20payments% aaaa20for%20ES.pdf (accessed 10 November 2020).
Wendland, K. J., Honzák, M., Portela, R., Vitale, B., Rubinoff, S., and Randrianarisoa, J. (2010). Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics 69, 2093–2107.
| Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21, 48–58.
| The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17298510PubMed |
Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 117, 234–243.
| Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wunder, S., Engel, S., and Pagiola, S. (2008). Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65, 834–852.
| Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wünscher, T., and Engel, S. (2012). International payments for biodiversity services: review and evaluation of conservation targeting approaches. Biological Conservation 152, 222–230.
| International payments for biodiversity services: review and evaluation of conservation targeting approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zakeri, E., Mousavi, S. A., and Karimzadeh, H. (2020). Scenario‐based modelling of soil conservation function by rangeland vegetation cover in northeastern Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences 79, 107.
| Scenario‐based modelling of soil conservation function by rangeland vegetation cover in northeastern Iran.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou, P., Luukkanen, O., Tokola, T., and Nieminen, J. (2008). Effect of vegetation cover on soil erosion in a mountainous watershed. Catena 75, 319–325.
| Effect of vegetation cover on soil erosion in a mountainous watershed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
