A site-based approach to delivering rangeland ecosystem services
Joel Brown A C and Neil MacLeod B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center and The Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM 88003-0003, USA.
B CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: joelbrow@nmsu.edu
The Rangeland Journal 33(2) 99-108 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ11006
Submitted: 8 February 2011 Accepted: 9 April 2011 Published: 22 June 2011
Abstract
Rangeland ecosystems are capable of providing an array of ecosystem services important to the wellbeing of society. Some of these services (e.g. meat, fibre) are transported to markets and their quantity, quality and value are established via a set of widely accepted standards. Other services (e.g. climate mitigation, water quality, wildlife habitat) do not leave the land, but are, in fact, most valuable when they remain in situ. Determining their quantity, quality and value presents a challenge that must be met if there is to be a credible, accessible ecosystem services market for rangelands. In this paper we describe some of the ecosystem services that may be extracted from rangelands, discuss their unique ecological nature and relate those unique ecological properties to soil and vegetation attributes that can serve as a basis for measurement, both quality and quantity. We suggest the use of a soil/vegetation-based system in which similar climate, geomorphology and edaphic properties are grouped into ecological sites based on their response to disturbance. Within each ecological site, a unique state and transition model describes the dynamics of vegetation and soil surface properties, provides state indicators (vegetation structure, soil properties), predicts ecosystem services that may be derived at multiple scales, and organises information related to management to achieve ecosystem service objectives, including sustainability.
Additional keywords: ecological site descriptions, state-and-transition models, environmental markets.
References
ACSM (1994). Glossary of the mapping sciences. In ‘American Congress on Surveying and Mapping’. Bethesda, MD. 581pp.Asner, G. P., Elmore, A. J., Olander, L. P., Martin, R. E., and Harris, A. T. (2004). Grazing systems, ecosystem responses and global change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29, 261–299.
| Grazing systems, ecosystem responses and global change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K., and Turner, R. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297, 950–953.
| Economic reasons for conserving wild nature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xmt1Clsb4%3D&md5=bbac3b7f67daf66d113d91934718559eCAS | 12169718PubMed |
Banzhaf, S., and Boyd, J. (2005). ‘The architecture and measurement of an ecosystem services index.’ Discussion Paper RFF DP 05-22. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.) Available at: www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-05-22.pdf (accessed 5 January 2011).
Barr, N., Karunaratne, K., and Wilkinson, R. (2005). ‘Australia’s Farmers: Past, Present and Future.’ (Land and Water Australia: Canberra.)
Bestelmeyer, B. T., and Brown, J. R. (2010). An introduction to the special issue on ecological sites. Rangelands 32, 3–4.
| An introduction to the special issue on ecological sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bestelmeyer, B. T., Moseley, K., Shaver, P. L., Sanchez, H., Briske, D. D., and Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2010). Practical guidance for developing state and transition models. Rangelands 32, 23–30.
| Practical guidance for developing state and transition models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
BLM (2005). ‘Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health.’ Technical Reference 1734-6. (Bureau of Land Management: Washington, DC.) Available at: http://usda-ars.nmsu.edu/monit_assess/PDF_files/IIRHv4.pdf (accessed 5 January 2011).
Boyd, J., and Banzhaf, S. (2006). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Discussion Paper 06–02, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Available at: www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-06-02.pdf (accessed 5 January 2011).
Brouwer, R. (2000). Environmental value transfer: state of the arts and future prospects. Ecological Economics 32, 137–152.
| Environmental value transfer: state of the arts and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, J. R. (2010). Ecological sites: their history, status and future. Rangelands 32, 5–8.
| Ecological sites: their history, status and future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown, J. R., and Sampson, N. (2009). Integrating terrestrial sequestration into a greenhouse gas management plan. In ‘Carbon Sequestration and Its Role in the Global Carbon Cycle’. Geophysical Monograph Series. (Eds B. McPherson and E. T. Sundquist.) pp. 317–324. (American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC.)
Brown, J. R., Angerer, J., Salley, S. W., Blaisdell, R., and Stuth, J. W. (2010). Improving estimates of rangeland carbon sequestration potential in the US Southwest. Rangeland Ecology and Management 63, 147–154.
| Improving estimates of rangeland carbon sequestration potential in the US Southwest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chicago Climate Exchange (2009). Sustainably managed rangeland soil carbon sequestration offset project protocol. Available at: www.chicagoclimatex.com/docs/offsets/CCX_Sustainably_Managed_Rangeland_Soil_Carbon_Sequestration.pdf (accessed 28 January 2011).
Cork, S. J., Proctor, W., Shelton, D., Abel, N., and Binning, C. (2002). The ecosystem services project: exploring the importance of ecosystems to people. Ecological Management & Restoration 3, 143–146.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limberg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.
| The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjtlShtbs%3D&md5=d952a302be4986f48055830c81703349CAS |
Daily, G. C. (1997). Introduction: what are ecosystem services? In ‘Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems’. (Ed. G. Daily.) pp. 1–10. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Daily, G. C., Alexander, S., Ehrlich, P. R., Goulder, L., Lubchenco, J., Matson, P. A., Mooney, H. A., Postel, S., Schneider, S. H., Tilman, D., and Woodwell, G. M. (1997). Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in Ecology 2, 1–18.
Doherty, K. E., Naugle, D. E., Copeland, H., Pocewicz, A., and Kiesecker, J. (2011). Energy development and conservation trade-offs: systematic planning for sage-grouse in their eastern range. In ‘Greater Sage-Grouse: Ecology and Conservation of a Landscape Species and Its Habitats. Studies in Avian Biology’. (Eds S. T. Knick and J. W. Connelly.) (In press.)
Duniway, M. C., Bestelmeyer, B. T., and Tugel, A. (2010). Soil processes and properties that distinguish ecological site and states. Rangelands 32, 9–15.
| Soil processes and properties that distinguish ecological site and states.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAO (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Available at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e00.pdf
Foley, J., DeFries, R., Asner, G., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S., Chapin, F., Coe, M., Daily, G., Gibbs, H., Helkowski, J., Holloway, T., Howard, E., Kucharik, C., Monfreda, C., Patz, J., Prentice, C., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574.
| Global consequences of land use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmsFChtrs%3D&md5=1eb720e048bb31d6f20af6349db8ba93CAS | 16040698PubMed |
Gentner, B. J., and Tanaka, J. A. (2002). Classifying federal public land grazing permitees. Journal of Range Management 55, 2–11.
| Classifying federal public land grazing permitees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilgert, W., and Zack, S. (2010). Integrating multiple ecosystem services into ecological site descriptions. Rangelands 32, 49–54.
| Integrating multiple ecosystem services into ecological site descriptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greig, P. J., and Devonshire, P. G. (1981). Tree removals and saline seepage in Victorian catchments – some hydrologic and economic results. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 25, 134–148.
Havstad, K. M., Peters, D. P. C., Skaggs, R., Brown, J. R., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Fredrickson, E., Herrick, J. E., and Wright, J. (2007). Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecological Economics. , .
| Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Karl, J. W., and Herrick, J. E. (2010). Monitoring and assessment based on ecological sites. Rangelands 32, 60–64.
| Monitoring and assessment based on ecological sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kimble, J. M., Follett, R., and Lal, R. (2001). The characteristics and extent of US grazing lands. In ‘The Potential of US Grazing Lands to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect’. (Eds R. F. Follett, J. M. Kimble and R. Lal.) pp. 3–19. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)
Kroeger, T., and Casey, F. (2007). An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological Economics 64, 321–332.
| An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kumar, P. (2005). ‘Market for Ecosystem Services.’ (International Institute for Sustainable Development: Winnipeg, Manitoba.)
Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627.
| Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXks1Cgsrk%3D&md5=7e0688f3ff582150dac77e88bf2c218fCAS | 15192216PubMed |
Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F., and Cole, C. V. (1998). ‘The Potential of US Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect.’ (Ann Arbor Press: Chelsea, MI.)
Lockwood, M., Walpole, S., and Miles, C. (2000). Economics of remnant native vegetation conservation on private property. Research Report 2/00, Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University, Albury.
MDBA (2010). Guide to the proposed Basin Plan. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. Available at: http://download.mdba.gov.au/Guide_to_the_Basin_Plan_Volume_1_web.pdf (accessed 5 January 2011).
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). ‘Ecosystem and Human Well-being: Synthesis.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R. (1989). ‘Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.’ (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.)
Monger, H. C., Cole, D. R., Buck, B. J., and Gallegos, R. A. (2009). Scale and the isotopic record of C4 plants in pedogenic carbonate: from the biome to the rhizosphere. Ecology 90, 1498–1511.
| Scale and the isotopic record of C4 plants in pedogenic carbonate: from the biome to the rhizosphere.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19569365PubMed |
Moseley, K., Shaver, P. L., Sanchez, H., and Bestelmeyer, B. T. (2010). Ecological site development: a gentle introduction. Rangelands 32, 16–22.
| Ecological site development: a gentle introduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murtough, G., Aretina, B., and Matysek, A. (2002). Creating markets for ecosystem services. Productivity Commission Staff Research Paper, Ausinfo, Canberra.
Peters, D. P. C., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Herrick, J. E., Fredrickson, E. L., Monger, H. C., and Havstad, K. M. (2006). Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights to forecasting arid and semiarid system dynamics. Bioscience 56, 491–501.
| Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights to forecasting arid and semiarid system dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rolfe, J. (2006). A simple guide to choice modeling and benefit transfer. In ‘Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values’. (Eds J. Rolfe and J. Bennett.) pp. 10–27. (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.)
Rolfe, J., and Prayaga, P. (2007). Estimating values for recreational fishing at freshwater dams in Queensland. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51, 157–174.
| Estimating values for recreational fishing at freshwater dams in Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rolfe, J., McCosker, J., and Windle, J. (2008). Identifying the incentives that graziers in central-western Queensland need to manage land for conservation outcomes. The Rangeland Journal 30, 297–303.
| Identifying the incentives that graziers in central-western Queensland need to manage land for conservation outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sanchez, P. A., Ahamed, S., Carré, F., Hartemink, A. E., Hempel, J., Huising, J., Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A. B., McKenzie, N. J., de Lourdes Mendonça-Santos, M., Minasny, B., Montanarella, L., Okoth, P., Palm, C. A., Sachs, J. D., Shepherd, K. D., Vågen, T., Vanlauwe, B., Walsh, M. G., Winowiecki, L. A., and Zhang, G. (2009). Digital soil map of the world. Science 325, 680–681.
| Digital soil map of the world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVSrs7bN&md5=43fc621c07ae511be592d939ec2de568CAS | 19661405PubMed |
Schuman, G. E., Janzen, H. H., and Herrick, J. E. (2002). Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environmental Pollution 116, 391–396.
| Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXovVersbs%3D&md5=09de80e89729a1481606d3852b302b0bCAS | 11822717PubMed |
Sinden, J. A., and Worrell, A. C. (1979). ‘Unpriced Values: Decisions without Market Prices.’ (Wiley-Interscience: New York.)
Stringham, T. K., Krueger, W. C., and Shaver, P. L. (2003). State and transition modeling: an ecological process approach. Journal of Range Management 56, 106–126.
| State and transition modeling: an ecological process approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sustainable Rangeland Roundtable (2008). ‘Sustainable Rangelands Ecosystem Goods and Services.’ SRR Monograph No. 3, Fort Collins, CO. Available at: www.sustainablerangelands.warnercnr.colostate.edu (accessed 5 January 2011).
Svejcar, T., Angell, R., Bradford, J. A., Dugas, W., Emmerich, W., Frank, A. B., Gilmanov, T., Haferkamp, M., Johnson, D. A., Mayeux, H., Mielnick, P., Morgan, J., Saliendra, N. Z., Schuman, G. E., Sims, P. L., and Snyder, K. (2008). Carbon fluxes on North American rangelands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61, 465–474.
| Carbon fluxes on North American rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Talbot, C. J., Campbell, S. B., Hansen, M., and Price, A. B. (2010). Information technologies and ecological site descriptions. Rangelands 32, 55–59.
| Information technologies and ecological site descriptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tanaka, J. A., Torell, L. A., and Rimbey, N. R. (2005). Who are these public land ranchers and why are they out there? The Western Economics Forum 4(2), 14–20. Available at: http://waeaonline.org/.
Thurow, T. L. (1991). Hydrology and erosion. In ‘Grazing Management: an Ecological Perspective’. (Eds R. Heitschmidt and J. Stuth.) pp. 141–159. (Timberline Press: Portland, OR.)
Tomblin, D. (2009). Native American cultural appropriation of ecosystem management and wilderness concepts. In ‘Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the 4S Annual Meeting – Abstract and Session Submissions’. (Society for Social Studies of Science: Baton Rouge, LA.) Available at: www.allacademic.com/meta/p370770_index.html (accessed 5 April 2011).
Torell, L. A., Ramirez, O. A., Rimbey, N. R., and McCollum, D. W. (2005). Income earning potential versus consumptive amenities in determining ranchland values. Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 30, 537–560.
USDA-NRCS (2003). ‘National Range and Pasture Handbook.’ (USDA-NRCS: Washington, DC.) Available at: www.glti.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/publications/nrph.html (accessed 5 January 2011).
West, N. E. (1993). Biodiversity of rangelands. Journal of Range Management 46, 2–13.
| Biodiversity of rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whisenant, S. G. (1999). ‘Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process-orientated, Landscape-scale Approach.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York.)
Whitten, S., and Shelton, D. (2005). ‘Market for Ecosystem Services in Australia: Practical Design and Case Studies.’ (CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems: Canberra.)
Whitten, S., Shelton, D., and Langston, A. (2004). ‘Market Based Instruments – A Rapid Assessment Technique for Identifying the Potential for MBI Application.’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra.)
Wilcox, B. P., and Thurow, T. L. (2006). Emerging issues in rangeland ecohydrology: vegetation change and the water cycle. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59, 220–224.
| Emerging issues in rangeland ecohydrology: vegetation change and the water cycle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woinarski, J. C. Z., and Fisher, A. (2003). Conservation and the maintenance of biodiversity in the rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 25, 157–171.
| Conservation and the maintenance of biodiversity in the rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
