Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > RJ > RJ08025
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 31(3)

Sharing Skippy: how can landholders be involved in kangaroo production in Australia?

Rosie Cooney A C , Alex Baumber A , Peter Ampt A and George Wilson B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Fate Program, Institute of Environmental Studies, Vallentine Annexe, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.

B Australian Wildlife Services, 51 Stonehaven Crescent, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: rosie.cooney@unsw.edu.au

The Rangeland Journal 31(3) 283-292 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ08025
Submitted: 6 June 2008  Accepted: 2 December 2008   Published: 28 August 2009

Abstract

For 2 decades, calls for Australian rangeland landholders to expand their reliance on the abundant species of native kangaroos and decrease their reliance on introduced stock have been made. These calls have received recent impetus from the challenge of climate change. Arguments for landholder involvement in kangaroo production include reduced greenhouse gas emissions, better management of total grazing pressure, reduced land degradation, improved vegetation and biodiversity outcomes, and greater valuation of kangaroos by landholders. However, there is little understanding of how landholders could be involved in kangaroo harvest and production, and there is a widespread misconception that this would include domestication, fencing, mustering and trucking. This paper reviews the options for landholder involvement in managing and harvesting wild kangaroos, and assesses the possible benefits and feasibility of such options. We conclude that collaboration among landholders, as well as between landholders and harvesters, forms the basis of any preferred option, and set out a proposed operating model based on the formation of a kangaroo management, processing and marketing co-operative.

Additional keywords: conservation, co-operative, sustainable use, total grazing pressure, wildlife management.


Acknowledgments

This work has benefited from particularly extensive input and discussion with Tom Garrett, who we would like to sincerely thank. We would particularly like to acknowledge and thank Carley and Nick Walker for the origins of the ‘kangaroo manager’ model. We would also like to acknowledge and thank the following for their valuable input: Brad Cooper, Stacey Henry, Bim Struss, Jeff Campbell, Merv Phillips, Alan Brady, Ray Borda, Doug Jobson, Dana Thomsen and Sheree Scott; and all the other landholders and harvesters from the SWEs and beyond that have taken part in meetings and workshops.


References


Ampt P., Baumber A. (2006) Building connections between kangaroos, commerce and conservation in the rangelands. Australian Zoologist 33, 398–409. (accessed 24/07/09).

Beeton R. , Buckley K. I. , Jones G. J. , Morgan D. , Reichelt R. E. , and Trewin D. (2006). Australia State of the Environment 2006. Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Available at: www.environment.gov.au/soe/2006/publications/report/index.html (accessed 24/07/09).

Bond I. B. , and Child D. de la Harpe , Jones B. , Barnes J. , and Anderson H. (2004). Private land contribution to conservation in South Africa. In: ‘Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development and the Bottom Line’. (Ed. B. Child) pp. 29–61. (Earthscan: London.)

Chapman M. (2003) Kangaroos and feral goats as economic resources for graziers: some views from south-west Queensland. The Rangeland Journal 25, 20–36.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | (accessed 24/07/09).

Cooper D. W., Larsen E. (2006) Immunocontraception of mammalian wildlife: ecological and immunogenetic issues. Reproduction 132, 821–828.
|  CAS | Crossref | PubMed |
(accessed 24/07/09).

Diesendorf M. (2007). Paths to a Low Carbon Future. Greenpeace, Australia. Available at: www.greenpeace.org/australia/resources/reports/climate-change/paths-to-a-low-carbon-future (accessed 24/07/09).

Finch N. A., Murray P. J., Dunn M. T., Billingsley J. (2006) Using machine vision classification to control access of animals to water. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 837–839.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 24/07/09).

Fulton M. , and Sanderson K. (2002). Co-operatives and Farmers in the New Agriculture. Report prepared for the Co-operatives Secretariat, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan. Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/31780

Garnaut R. (2008). ‘The Garnaut Climate Change Review: Final Report.’ (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, Vic.)

Glen A. S., Dickman C. R., Soule M. E., Mackey B. G. (2007) Evaluating the role of the dingo as a trophic regulator in Australian ecosystems. Austral Ecology 32, 492–501.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 24/07/09).

Grigg G. (1987a) Kangaroo harvesting – a new approach. Australian Natural History 22, 204–205. (accessed 24/07/09).

Henry E. S. , and Watson G. K. (1998). Kangaroo Marketing for Landowners: Exploratory Action Research for Tilpa Rangeland Investment Company. A Report to the Total Catchment Management – Western Catchment Management Committee, Orange Agricultural College, University of Sydney, Sydney.

Johnson C. (2006). ‘Australia’s Mammal Extinctions: A 50 000 Year History.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Kelly J. (2005). Kangaroo Industry Strategic Plan 2005–2010. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. Report no 05/108. Available at: http://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/05-108 (accessed 24/07/09).

Kempton T., Murray R., Leng R. (1976) Methane production and digestibility measurements in the grey kangaroo and sheep. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 29, 209–214.
|  CAS | PubMed |
(accessed 24/07/09).

Martin A. (1995). The pastoralist’s role – where to now? In: ‘Conservation Through Sustainable Use of Wildlife’. (Eds G. Grigg, P. Hale and D. Lunney.) pp. 6–8. (Centre for Conservation Biology, University of Queensland: Brisbane.)

Pople A. R., Phinn S. R., Menke N., Grigg G. C., Possingham H. P., McAlpine C. (2007) Spatial patterns of kangaroo density across the South Australian pastoral zone over 26 years: aggregation during drought and suggestions of long distance movement. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 1068–1079.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (accessed 24/07/09).

Thomsen D. , and Davies J. (2007). ‘People and Kangaroos in the South Australian Rangelands: Social and Institutional Considerations for Kangaroo Management and the Kangaroo Industry.’ Publ. No. 07–039. (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra.) Available at: http://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/07-039 (accessed 24/07/09).

Viggers K. L., Hearn J. P. (2005) The kangaroo conundrum: home range studies and implications for land management. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 99–107.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wagner M., Kaiser R., Kreuter U., Wilkins N. (2007) Managing the commons Texas style: wildlife management and ground-water associations on private lands. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43, 698–711.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilson G., Edwards M. (2008) Native wildlife on rangelands to minimize methane and produce lower-emission meat: kangaroos versus livestock. Conservation Letters 1, 119–128.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilson G. , and Mitchell B. (2005). ‘A Strategic Plan for Trialling Sustainable Wildlife Enterprises: Guidelines for Conservation-based Enterprises as an Incentive to Restore On-farm Habitat.’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra.)