Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > RD > RD07048
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 19(5)

Pregnancy and calving rates following transfer of in-vitro-produced river and F1 (river × swamp) buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos in recipients on natural oestrus or synchronised for ovulation

Xianwei Liang A , Xiufang Zhang A , Bingzhuang Yang A , Mingtang Cheng A , Fenxiang Huang A , Chunying Pang A , Guangsheng Qing A , Chaohui Liao A , Shengju Wei A , Elena M. Senatore B , Antonino Bella C and Giorgio A. Presicce B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Guangxi Buffalo Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Nanning 530001, P.R. China.

B ARSIAL – Centro Regionale per la Zootecnia, Rome, Italy.

C Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

D Corresponding author. Email: gpresicce@arsial.it

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(5) 670-676 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD07048
Submitted: 13 March 2007  Accepted: 2 May 2007   Published: 2 July 2007

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to compare pregnancy and calving rates following transfer of in-vitro-produced fresh river and F1 (river × swamp) buffalo embryos in recipients synchronised by Ovsynch protocol or following natural oestrus. River embryos were produced from cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) derived by ovum pick up (OPU) on 40 Murrah and Nili-Ravi donor buffaloes over a twice-weekly collection schedule for 120 single OPUs. F1 embryos were produced by fertilisation of swamp COCs recovered from abattoir ovaries coincubated with river sperm cells. Both groups of embryos were produced following the same protocol for in vitro production. With regard to the OPU source of COCs, 923 antral follicles were punctured and 647 COCs were recovered (70%). From 462 selected COCs for IVM, 257 (55.6%) cleaved zygotes were recorded leading to 93 blastocysts (20.1%). In total, 590 swamp COCs were aspirated from abattoir ovaries and 476 were selected for IVM leading to 270 (56.7%) cleaved zygotes and resulting in 137 blastocysts (28.8%). River and F1 embryos were transferred between Day 6 to 7 of in vitro development, corresponding to blastocyst–expanding blastocyst, into F1 recipients synchronised by Ovsynch and swamp buffaloes following natural oestrus, respectively, each of them receiving two embryos. According to palpation per rectum of the ovaries at the time of embryo transfer, 26 of the 47 (55.3%) F1 recipients synchronised by Ovsynch were considered suitable for transfer, resulting in seven pregnancies (26.9%) and four calvings (15.3%) owing to three abortions occurring between 2 and 3 months of pregnancy. In total, 29 swamp recipients following natural oestrus were judged suitable as recipients, resulting in 12 pregnancies (41.4%) and 10 calvings (34.5%) owing to two abortions at 2 and 3 months of gestation respectively. Pregnancy and calving rates following transfer of river and F1 embryos were similar. Likewise, weight at birth of calves derived from transfer of river and F1 embryos was not different: 30.5 ± 1.4 and 32.9 ± 2.4 respectively. Pregnancy and calving rates following AI in a group of river and swamp buffaloes considered for reference in this study were similar to recipients carrying in-vitro-produced embryos. Collectively, no apparent postnatal complications were recorded in resulting live calves.

Additional keywords: breeding strategies for buffaloes.


Acknowledgements

This work was supported by International S&T Cooperation Program of China (No. 2003A A0010) and Guangxi Science Foundation (No. 0443001–15, No. 0229026).


References

Baruselli, P. S. , Marques, M. O. , Carvalho, N. A. T. , Valentim, R. , Berber, R. C. A. , Carvalho Filho, A. F. , Madureira, E. H. , and Costa Neto, W. P. (2000). Ovsynch protocol with fixed-time embryo transfer increasing pregnancy rates in bovine recipients. Arq Fac Vet UFRGS 28((Suppl)), 205.
Drost M. (1991). Training manual for embryo transfer in water buffaloes. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 84, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Drost, M. , and Elsden, R. P. (1985). Blastocyst development in the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology 23, 191.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | FAO (1979). Buffalo reproduction and artificial insemination. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 143–151 and 173–181.

Gasparrini, B. (2002). In vitro embryo production in buffalo species: state of the art. Theriogenology 57, 237–256.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS). (1998). ‘Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society.’ 3rd edn. (Eds D. A. Stringlellow and S. M. Seidel.) (IETS: Savoy, IL.)

Jainudeen M. R. (1989). A review of embryo trnasfer in the buffalo. In ‘Domestic Buffalo Production in Asia’. (FAO/IAEA meeting, 20–24 February 1989, Rockhampton, Australia.) pp. 103–120.

Karaivanov, C. , Vlahov, K. , Petrov, M. , Kacheva, D. , Stojanova, M. , Alexiev, A. , Polihronov, O. , and Danev, A. (1987). Studies on preimplantation development of buffalo embryos. Theriogenology 28, 747–753.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Seren E., and Parmeggiani A. (1997). Oestrous cycle in Italian buffalo. In ‘Third Course on Biotechnology of Reproduction in Buffaloes, 6–10 October 1997, Caserta, Italy.’ pp. 21–28. Supplement to n. 4 of Bubalus bubalis – Journal of Buffalo Science and Technique.

Shamsuddin M., Larsson B., Gustafsson H., Gustari S., Bartolome J., and Rodriguez-Martinez H. (1992). Comparative morphological evaluation of in vivo and in vitro produced bovine embryos. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, 23–27 August 1992, The Hague, The Netherlands’. pp. 1333–1335.(Elsevier.)

Singla S. K., Madan M. L., Manik R. S., Ambrose J. D., and Chauhan M. S. (1992). Fertilization and early embryo development pattern in superovulated buffaloes. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, The Hague, The Netherlands’. pp. 817–819.

Thompson, J. G. , Mitchell, M. , and Kind, K. L. (2007). Embryo culture and long-term consequences. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 19, 43–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Virakul P. (2006). Conception, gestation and parturition in swamp buffalo. In ‘International Course of Buffalo Reproduction and Reproductive Biotechnology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand’. (Eds C. Lohachit, M. Techakumphu, S. Sirivaidyapong, T. Tharasanit and O. Cheunsuang.) pp. 62–67.

Walker S. K., Heard T. M., Bee C. A., Frensham A. B., Warnes D. M., and Seamark R. F. (1992). Culture of embryos from farm animals. In ‘Embryonic Development and Manipulation in Animal Production’. (Eds A. Lauria and F. Gandolfi.) pp. 77–92. (Portland Press: London.)

Young, L. E. , Sinclair, K. D. , and Wilmut, I. (1998). Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev. Reprod. 3, 155–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Zhang C. (2006). The model of Chinese buffalo breeding. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th Asian Buffalo Congress, 18–22 April 2006, Nanning, China’. (Ed. Y. Bingzhuang.) pp. 166–185.

Zicarelli L. (2001). Buffalo milk production world-wide. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th World Buffalo Congress, 20–23 May 2001, Maracaibo, Zulia, Venezuela’. (Eds N. Huerta-Leidenz, J. Vergara-Lopez and A. Rodas-Gonzales.) pp. 202–230. (Central Compilation & Translation Press.)

Zicarelli L., Infascelli F., Esposito L., Consalvo F., and De Franciscis G. (1988). Influence of climate on spontaneous and alfaprostol induced heats in Mediterranean buffalo cows bred in Italy. In ‘Proceedings of the 2nd World Buffalo Congress, 12–16 December 1988, New Dehli, India’. Vol. III (Ed. R. R. Lokeshwar.) pp. 49–56.

Zicarelli, L. , Esposito, L. , Campanile, G. , Di Palo, R. , and Armstrong, D. T. (1997). Effect of using vasectomized bulls in AI practice on the reproductive efficiency of Italian buffalo cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 47, 171–180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |