Effect of undernutrition on uterine progesterone and oestrogen receptors and on endocrine profiles during the ovine oestrous cycle
C. Sosa A B E , J. A. Abecia A , F. Forcada A , C. Viñoles C , C. Tasende B , J. A. Valares A , I. Palacín A , G. B. Martin D and A. Meikle BA Animal Production and Food Science, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
B Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lasplaces 1550, 11600 Montevideo, Uruguay.
C Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulsväg 8C, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
D School of Animal Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: cecis@adinet.com.uy
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(4) 447-458 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD05138
Submitted: 14 October 2005 Accepted: 22 January 2006 Published: 4 April 2006
Abstract
In the present study, it was investigated whether undernutrition affected the binding capacity, immunoreactivity and mRNA expression for uterine oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR, respectively) in sheep, as well as whether the responses were associated with changes in plasma concentrations of progesterone (P4), oestradiol (E2), glucose, fatty acids, insulin, leptin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I during the oestrous cycle. Twenty ewes were fed either 1.5 (C) or 0.5 (L) times their maintenance requirements and were killed on Day 5 or 14 of the cycle (Day 0 = oestrus). Compared with Group C, Group L had higher concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids and lower concentrations of insulin, leptin and IGF-I. Group L also had higher plasma concentrations of P4 during the final days of the luteal phase. At oestrus in both treatment groups, there were peaks in the concentrations of glucose, insulin and IGF-I. For ER and PR, transcript expression, binding capacity and immunoreactivity were higher on Day 5 than on Day 14 of the cycle. The binding capacities for ER and PR were lower in Group L than in Group C on Day 5. Group C showed more immunoreactive staining for ER than did Group L in two of five cell types, whereas no effect of treatment was observed for PR immunoreactivity. There was more PR mRNA in the uterine horn contralateral to the corpus luteum in Group C than in Group L ewes. We conclude that undernutrition impairs steroid receptor expression and binding capacity. This may alter the uterine environment and help explain the reductions in embryo survival.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr E. G. Garófalo for her constructive criticism of the manuscript, as well as the technical assistance of I. Sartore and P. Rubianes. The authors also thank Dr N. Ing for kindly providing the ER and PR cDNA. The present study received financial support from CICYT, AGL2001-1817 and AGL2004-00432/GAN, Spain.
Abecia, J. A. , Rhind, S. M. , Bramley, T. A. , and McMillen, S. R. (1995). Steroid production and LH receptor concentrations of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea and associated rates of ova wastage in ewes given high and low levels of food intake before and after mating. Anim. Sci. 60, 57–62.
Aronica, S. M. , and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1991). Progesterone receptor regulation in uterine cells: stimulation by estrogen, cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monoposphate, and insulin-like growth factor I and suppression by antiestrogens and protein kinase inhibitors. Endocrinology 128, 2045–2052.
| PubMed |
Flint, A. P. F. , Sheldrick, E. L. , and Fisher, P. A. (2002). Ligand-independent activation of steroid receptors. Domest. Anim. Endocrin. 23, 13–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang, S. , Blache, D. , Blackberry, M. A. , and Martin, G. B. (2005). Body reserves affect the reproductive endocrine responses to an acute change in nutrition in mature male sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 88, 257–269.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Zulu, V. C. , Nakao, T. , and Sawamukai, Y. (2002). Insulin-like growth factor-I as a possible hormonal mediator of nutritional regulation of reproduction in cattle. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 64, 657–665.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |