Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

14 EQUINE CLONING AND EMBRYO AGGREGATION: EFFECT OF BOVINE, PORCINE, FELINE AND EQUINE OOPLAST

A. Gambini A , J. Jarazo A , A. De Stefano A , F. Karlanian A and D. Salamone A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 24(1) 118-119 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv24n1Ab14
Published: 6 December 2011

Abstract

The low number of horse slaughterhouses is one of the reasons for the limited availability of horse oocytes for research in cloning. The aim of our study was to assess the capability of equine, bovine, porcine, or feline ooplast to produce cloned embryos when equine cells are used as donor nuclei and to evaluate if embryo aggregation improves their development. Oocytes from mentioned species were collected from ovaries derived from slaughterhouses, except for cat ovaries that were obtained from ovariectomized queens. Oocytes were matured in TCM199 supplemented following standard protocols for each species. After maturation, cumulus and zona pellucida were removed. Enucleation was performed by aspiration of the metaphase plate under ultraviolet light. Donor cell and ooplast were attached by phytohemagglutinin treatment and then electrofused. Activation protocols were ionomycin for 4 min, except for porcine, which were electrically activated, followed by culture in 1.9 mM 6-DMAP for bovine, feline and porcine, except for equine: 1 mM 6-DMAP with 5 mg mL–1 of cycloheximide. Reconstructed embryos (RE) were cultured in SOF in the well of well system in 2 different groups: only one RE per well (1X) and three RE per well (3X, aggregated embryos, AE). Blastocysts derived from homospecific clones were transferred to synchronized mares. Cleavage and maximum development stage achieved of all experimental groups were assessed. In vitro development was compared using the chi-square test. In group 1X, a total of 64, 49, 38 and 145 RE were performed for porcine, bovine, feline and equine, respectively and in group 3X, 88, 48, 48 and 195 RE. Cleavage of cloned embryos ranged from 67 to 87%. Aggregated of homospecific equine clones showed the highest blastocyst rates (1X: 5.5%, 3X: 34%) and after embryo transfer (4 recipients for each group), an ongoing pregnancy (day 300, at the time of submission) was only achieved with aggregated embryo confirming the positive effect of embryo aggregation in these clones. The stages with higher developmental arrest of heterospecific nonaggregated embryos were 2 to 4 cells for porcine ooplast (23/64, 36%) and 4 to 8 cells for bovine and feline ooplast (37/49, 75% and 18/38, 47%, respectively). Blastocyst stage was only reached using feline ooplast (group I: 2/38, 5.26% and group II: 2/16, 12.5%). Heterospecific aggregated clones were able to achieve 16-cell stage, showing statistic differences compared with group 1X. As we reported previously, embryo aggregation shows benefits for homospecific equine clones, although more studies are needed to clarify if aggregation of heterospecific clones has the same effect. All heterospecific ooplasm was able to support embryo development. The stage of major developmental arrests was similar to embryonic genomic activation stage. Our results suggest that cat oocyte seems to be the best receptor to support equine cloned embryo development.