229 INFLUENCE OF SPERM TREATMENT ON SPERM HEAD DECONDENSATION FERTILIZING WITH EJACULATED AND EPIDIDYMAL PORCINE SPERM BY ICSI
F. A. Garcia-Vazquez A , K. Aviles-Lopez A and C. Matas ADepartment Physiology, Veterinary School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 21(1) 212-212 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv21n1Ab229
Published: 9 December 2008
Abstract
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) provides a possible remedy to produce high numbers of monospermic zygotes. However, the efficiency of ICSI in pigs is low, mainly due to a failure of oocyte activation and low incidence of sperm head decondensation. The persistence of an intact sperm acrosome, plasma membrane, and perinuclear theca, which are removed during the process of sperm penetration in natural fertilization, are considered major reasons for low male pronuclear formation after ICSI in the oocytes, which are capable of supporting male pronuclear formation after IVF. Failure of male pronucleus formation is the major fertilization defect causing embryo development failure in pig oocytes subjected to ICSI (Lee JW et al. 2003 Theriogenology 59, 305). The main objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of sperm treatment on sperm head decondensation for ejaculated and epididymal spermatozoa used with ICSI. We divided ejaculated (EJ) and epididymal (EP) sperm into 3 treatment groups: 1) sperm without any treatment (control = C), 2) spermatozoa washed through a Percoll® gradient (P), and 3) spermatozoa washed through Percoll® followed by 30 min of incubation in porcine oviductal fluid (POF). Oocytes were matured in vitro 44 h in NCSU-37 and microinjected with sperm from the different treatment. Four hours after injection, the putative zygotes were stained with Hoescht and classificated as: (i) intact, (ii) low level of decondensation, and (iii) high level of decondensation and male pronuclei. A total of 461 oocytes were injected in 6 replicates. Sperm head decondensation (categorical data) was modeled using a binomial model of parameters and analyzed by ANOVA. The EP-C treatment showed a higher level of intact sperm (21.95 ± 3.4) than the other treatments (EP-P: 16 ± 3.6; EP-POF: 6.58 ± 3.6; EJ-C: 12.33 ± 3.7; EJ-P 5 ± 3.5; EJ-POF: 5.3 ± 3.6). Ejaculated sperm showed lower decondensation levels (C: 49.32 ± 5.7; P: 38.75 ± 5.4; POF: 32.00 ± 5.6) compared to epididymal sperm (C: 67.07 ± 5.4; P: 64 ± 5.6; POF: 61.84 ± 5.6). Sperm decondensation and male pronuclear formation were higher in EJ-P (56.25 ± 5.0) and EJ-POF (62.67 ± 5.2) compared to other groups (EP-C: 10.89 ± 4.9; EP-P: 20.00 ± 5.2; EP-POF: 31.58 ± 5.1; EJ-C: 38.36 ± 5.2). In conclusion, the EJ sperm exhibited higher levels of head sperm decondensation and pronuclei formation than EP sperm; the modification of sperm membrane mediated by washing sperm through Percoll® or incubating with POF induced faster decondensation than sperm without any treatment.
Supported by MEC (AGL2006-03495).