IETS management of the challenges associated with embryo pathogen interaction
Michel Thibier A * and George Perry BA
B
Abstract
One of the very first challenges the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) addressed was concern about disease transmission via the transfer of in vivo–derived (IVD) bovine embryos. IETS commissioned its Import/Export Committee, later named Health and Safety Advisory Committee (HASAC), to resolve this matter, with the assistance of the Data Retrieval Committee following its formation in 1991. Since its first meeting in 1984, considerable achievements have been made, including meeting the numerous challenges created by the many innovations in this industry. Based on research studies and their designs, the IETS HASAC developed a system for categorising pathogens and diseases potentially susceptible to interaction with IVD embryos. This has been instrumental in defining safe operating protocols and ultimately leading to the development of the now universally accepted techniques for certification of embryo health. The close cooperation of IETS/HASAC with the World Organization of Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE) has facilitated the establishment of guidelines for regulators worldwide, thus ensuring the safety of international trade with embryos, while avoiding unjustified regulatory measures. In addition, IETS/HASAC produced and published the IETS Manual: A Procedural Guide and General Information for the Use of Embryo Transfer Technology Emphasising Sanitary Procedures for the embryo transfer industry (1st edition, 1987; 5th edition, 2023). This manual and its updates were designed to provide the industry world-wide with a source of information on safe and sanitary handling procedures for embryos, to describe the procedures necessary to ensure that the transfer of embryos does not result in transmission of pathogenic agents or disease, and to ensure consistent and accurate identification of embryos. The result of these 40 years of IETS/HASAC involvement is that embryo transfer technology is recognised as having a comparative advantage in international movement of germplasm.
Keywords: animal embryo transfer, categorization of diseases or pathogens for embryos, Health and Safety Advisory Committee, IETS Manual, in vitro produced embryos, in vivo derived embryos, International Embryo Technology Society, international health control.
References
Denner J (2022) Risk of pathogenic virus transmission by somatic cell nuclear transfer: implications for xenotransplantation. Biology of Reproduction 107, 717-722.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gard JA, Stringfellow DA (2014) Shaping the norms that regulate international commerce of embryos. Theriogenology 81, 56-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gard Schnuelle J (2021) Emerging diseases in international trade in embryos. Reproduction Fertility and Development 33, 55-65.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hare WCD (1990) Design and analysis of research on infectious disease transmission by embryos. Theriogenology 33, 51-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
OIE (1985) Round table meeting on sanitary problems related to Embryo Transfers. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l OIE 4, 843-913.
| Google Scholar |
Oseikria M, Pellerin JL, Rodolakis A, Vorimore F, Laroucau K, Bruyas JF, Roux C, Michaud S, Larrat M, Fieni F (2016) Can Chlamydia abortus be transmitted by embryo transfer in goats? Theriogenology 86, 1482-1488.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pellerin JL, Alsaleh A, Mermillod P, Souza-Fabjan JMG, Rodolakis A, Rousset E, Dubreil L, Bruyas JF, Roux C, Fieni F (2018) Attachment of Coxiella burnetii to the zona pellucida of in vitro produced goat embryos. Theriogenology 106, 259-264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Perry GH (2007) Risk assessment of transmission of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in abattoir-derived in vitro produced embryos. Theriogenology 68, 38-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Singh EL (1987) The disease control potential of embryos. Theriogenology 27, 9-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thibier M (1991) Statistics of the ET Industry around the world. Embryo Transfer Newsletter 9(4), 8-9.
| Google Scholar |
Thibier M (1998) The Embryo Transfer statistics from around the World – A data Retrieval Committee Report. Embryo Transfer Newsletter 16(4), 41-21.
| Google Scholar |
Thibier M (2001) Identified and unidentified challenges for Reproductive Biotechnologies regarding infectious diseases in animal and Public Health. Theriogenology 56, 1465-1481.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Thibier M (2006) Biosecurity and the various types of embryos transferred. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 41, 260-267.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thibier M (2011) Embryo transfer, a comparative biosecurity advantage in international movements of germplasm. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l OIE 30, 177-188.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Thibier M, Stringfellow DA (2003) Health and Safety advisory Committee (HASAC) of the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) has managed critical challenges for two decades. Theriogenology 59, 1067-1078.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
van der Kuyl AC, Berkhout B (2022) Viruses in the reproductive tract: on their way to the germ line. Virus Research 286, 198101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Viana JHM (2021) Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals A new milestone has been reached: transfers of IVP embryos were over one million worldwide. Embryo Technology Newsletter 40(4), 20.
| Google Scholar |
Wrathall AE (1997) Risks of transmitting scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy by semen and embryos. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l OIE 16, 240-264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wrathall AE, Holyoak GR, Parsonson IM, Simmons HA (2008) Risks of transmitting ruminant spongiform encephalopathies (prion diseases) by semen and embryo transfer techniques. Theriogenology 70, 725-745.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
