Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
REVIEW

Ethics and animal reproductive technologies

Jimmy Voisine A and Marc André Sirard A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre de Recherche en Reproduction, Développement et Santé Intergénérationnelle, Faculté des Sciences de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Département des Sciences Animales, Pavillon INAF, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.


Reproduction, Fertility and Development 34(2) 214-233 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD21284
Published online: 3 November 2021

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the IETS

Abstract

This paper offers a framework to help animal scientists engage in critical thinking about their own practices. Its objective is to reinforce their ability to participate in debates and discussions about the ethics surrounding the use of modern animal reproductive technologies (ART). This will be achieved first by exploring some of the most important philosophical conceptualizations of animals in Western philosophy, which are shaping the way humans interact with them. Then, we will analyse whether modern ART constitute ethically significant innovations in comparison with more traditional animal breeding practices, or whether they stand in continuity with the latter. This will be followed by a review some of the most important ethical issues with modern ART, where human, animal welfare, environmental and socio-economic issues will be discussed.

Keywords: animal, ethics, nuclear transfer, philosophy, reproductive technologies, transgenesis, welfare.


References

Aldridge S (2012a) Microinjection. In ‘Biotechnologies: in context. Vol. 2’. (Eds BW Lerner, KL Lerner). (Gale Publishing: Detroit, MI, USA)

Aldridge S (2012b) Transgenic animals. In ‘Biotechnologies: in context. Vol. 2’. (Eds BW Lerner, KL Lerner). (Gale Publishing: Detroit, MI, USA)

Aronsen, T, Ulvan, EM, Næsje, TF, et al. (2020). Escape history and proportion of farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar on the coast and in an adjacent salmon fjord in Norway. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 12, 371–383.
Escape history and proportion of farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar on the coast and in an adjacent salmon fjord in Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beauchamp TL, Frey RG (Eds) (2011) ‘The Oxford handbook of animal ethics’. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Bentham J (1948) ‘Introduction to the principles of moral and legislation’. (Hafner: New York, NY, USA)

Berry W (1996) ‘The unsettling of America: culture & agriculture’. (Sierra Club Books: San Francisco, CA, USA)

Brewer, DJ (1992). Zooarchaeology: method, theory, and goals. Archaeological Method and Theory 4, 195–244.

Buehr, M, Hjorth, JP, Hansen, AK, and Sandøe, P (2003). Genetically modified laboratory animals – what welfare problems do they face? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6, 319–338.
Genetically modified laboratory animals – what welfare problems do they face?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14965786PubMed |

Callicott JB, Frodeman R (2009) ‘Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy’. (Macmillan Reference USA: Farmington Hills, MI, USA)

Callicott JB, Overhold TW, Jones W (1982) ‘Clothed-in-fur and other tales: an introduction to the Ojibwa worldview’. (University Press of America: Washington, DC, USA)

Caplan, AL, Brendan, P, Michael, S, et al. (2015). No time to waste – the ethical challenges created by CRISPR. EMBO Reports 16, 1421–1426.
No time to waste – the ethical challenges created by CRISPR.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26450575PubMed |

Cochrane WW (1993) ‘The development of American agriculture: a historical analysis’. (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA)

Cohen, S (2014). The ethics of de-extinction. NanoEthics 8, 165–178.
The ethics of de-extinction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cottingham, J (1978). ‘A brute to the brutes?’: descartes’ treatment of animals. Philosophy 53, 551–559.
‘A brute to the brutes?’: descartes’ treatment of animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crosby AW (1986) ‘Ecological imperialsim: the biological expansion of Europe, 900–1900’. (Cambridge University Press: London, UK)

Entis, E (1998). Aquadvantage salmon: a case study in transgenic food. Animal Biotechnology 9, 165–170.
Aquadvantage salmon: a case study in transgenic food.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eriksson, S, Jonas, E, Rydhmer, L, and Röcklinsberg, H (2018). Breeding and ethical perspectives on genetically modified and genome edited cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 1–17.
Breeding and ethical perspectives on genetically modified and genome edited cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29102147PubMed |

FAO (2011) ‘Global food losses and food waste – extent, causes and prevention’. (FAO: Rome, Italy)

FAO (2013) In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 14, Rome, Italy.

Fletcher AL (2014) ‘Mendel’s ark: biotechnology and the future of extinction’. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Fuentes A (2009) ‘The evolution of human behavior’. (Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA)

Gaukroger S (2004) ‘Descartes’ system of natural philosophy’. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Gawande K (2005) ‘The structure of lobbying and protection in U.S. agriculture’. (World Bank: Washington, DC, USA)

Gjerris M (2012) Animal biotechnology: the ethical landscape. In ‘Designer animals: mapping the issues in animal biotechnology’. (Eds CG Brunk, S Hartley). (Toronto University Press: Toronto, Canada)

Golovan, SP, Meidinger, RG, Ajakaiye, A, et al. (2001). Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure. Nature Biotechnology 19, 741–745.
Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11479566PubMed |

Harlan JR (1992) ‘Crops and man’. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Harman E (2011) The moral significance of animal pain and animal death. In ‘The Oxford handbook of animal ethics’. (Eds TL Beauchamp, RG Frey). (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Harris M, Ross EB (1978) Origins of the U.S. Preference for Beef, Psychology Today.

Hettinger, N, and Throop, B (1999). Refocusing ecocentrism: de-emphasizing stability and defending wildness, environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 21, 3–21.

Holt WV, Watson PF (2004) Role of new and current methods in semen technology for genetic resource conservation. In ‘Farm animal genetic resource’. (Eds G Simm, B Villanueva, S Townsend). (British Society for Animal Science: Nottingham, UK)

Hyvönen, P, Suojala, L, Orro, T, et al. (2006). Transgenic cows that produce recombinant human lactoferrin in milk are not protected from experimental Escherichia coli intramammary infection. Infection and Immunity 74, 6206–6212.
Transgenic cows that produce recombinant human lactoferrin in milk are not protected from experimental Escherichia coli intramammary infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16954396PubMed |

Johnston, BC, Zaraatkar, D, Han, MA, et al. (2019). Unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: dietary guideline recommendations from the nutritional recommendations (NutriRECS) consortium. Annals of Internal Medecine 171, 756–764.
Unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: dietary guideline recommendations from the nutritional recommendations (NutriRECS) consortium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kant I (1991) ‘The metaphysics of morals’. (Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, UK)

Kim, H, and Kim, J-S (2014). A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nature Review Genetics 15, 321–334.
A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kimlicka W, Donaldson S (2013) ‘Zoopolis: a political theory of animal rights’. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Koth PEK (2012) Glofish®. In ‘Biotechnologies: in context. Vol. 2’. (Eds BW Lerner, KL Lerner). (Gale Publishing: Detroit, MI, USA)

Lanzerath D (2018) Ethical aspects of animal biotechnology. In ‘Animal Biotechnology. Vol. 2’. (Eds H Niemann, C Wrenzycki). (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Leakey R, Lewin R (1995) ‘The sixth extinction: patterns of life and the future of humankind’. (Doubleday: New York, NY, USA)

Leopold A (1972) ‘Round river: from the Journals of Aldo Leopold’. (Oxford University Press: Londres, UK)

Mayr, E (1996). What is a species, and what is not? Philosophy of Science 63, 262–277.
What is a species, and what is not?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mazoyer M, Roudart L (2006) ‘A history of world agriculture: from the neolithic age to the current crisis’. (Earthscan: London, UK)

Memi, F, Ntokou, A, and Papangeli, I (2018). CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing: research technologies, clinical applications and ethical consideration. Seminars in Perinatology 42, 487–500.
CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing: research technologies, clinical applications and ethical consideration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30482590PubMed |

Noble M (2010) Paying the polluters: animal factories feast on taxpayer subsidies. In ‘The CAFO reader’. (Ed. D Imhoff). (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA)

Nui, D, Wei, H-J, Lin, L, et al. (2017). Inactivation of endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR/Cas9. Science 357, 1303–1307.
Inactivation of endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR/Cas9.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paton HJ (1946) ‘The categorical imperative: a study in Kant’s moral philosophy’. (Hutchinson: New York, NY, UK)

Pimentel, D, and Pimentel, M (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78, 660S–663S.
Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pina-Aguilar, RE, Lopez-Saucedo, J, Sheffield, R, and Ruiz-Galaz, LI (2009). Revival of extinct species using nuclear transfer: hope for the mammoth, true for the Pyrenean ibex, but is it time for “conservation cloning”? Cloning and Stem Cells 11, 341–346.
Revival of extinct species using nuclear transfer: hope for the mammoth, true for the Pyrenean ibex, but is it time for “conservation cloning”?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19594389PubMed |

Primack RB (2018) ‘Essentials of conservation biology’. (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA)

Pursel VG (2011) Transgenic animals. In ‘Encyclopedia of biotechnology in agriculture and food’. (Eds DR Heldman, DG Hoover, MB Weelher). (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Rachels J (1986) ‘The elements of moral philosophy’. (Temple University Press: Philadelphia, PA, USA)

Rauw, WM, Kanis, E, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, et al. (1998). Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56, 15–33.
Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Regan T (1983) ‘The case for animal rights’. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA)

Richards RA (2010) ‘The species problem: a philosophical analysis’. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Ruse M (1996) ‘Monad to man: the concept of progress in evolutionary biology’. (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA)

Schlosser E (2012) ‘Fast food nation: the dark side of the all-American meal’. (Mariner Books: Boston, MA, USA)

Shepard P (1973) ‘The tender carnivore and the sacred game’. (Scribner: New York, NY, USA)

Shiva V (1997) ‘Biopiracy: the plunder of nature and knowledge’. (Between The Lines: Toronto, Canada)

Shiva V (2000) ‘Stolen harvest: the hijacking of the global food supply’. (South End Press: Cambridge, MA, USA)

Singer P (2002) ‘Animal liberation’. (Ecco: New York, USA)

Smith KR (2008) Animal genetic manipulation: a utilitarian response. In ‘The animal ethics reader’. (Eds SJ Armstrong, RG Botzler). (Routledge: New York, NY, USA)

Thibier M, Humblot P, Guerin B (2004) Role of reproductive biotechnologies: global perspective, current methods and success rates. In ‘Farm animal genetic resource’. (Eds G Simm, B Villanueva, S Townsend). (British Society for Animal Science: Nottingham, UK)

Thompson PB (2007) ‘Food biotechnolgy in ethical perspective’. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Turner J (2010) ‘Animal breeding, welfare and society’. (Earthscan: London, UK)

Twine R (2010) ‘Animals as biotechnology: ethics, sustainability and critical animal studies’. (Earthscan: London, UK)

Ungar PS, Sponheimer M (2013) The diet of early hominins. In ‘Nutritional anthropology: biocultural perspectives on food and nutrition’. (Eds DL Dufour, AH Goodman, GH Peltro). (Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA)

Wang, M, Sun, Z, Yu, T, et al. (2017). Large-scale production of recombinant human lactoferrin from high-expression, marker-free transgenic cloned cows. Scientific Reports 7, 10733.
Large-scale production of recombinant human lactoferrin from high-expression, marker-free transgenic cloned cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28878310PubMed |

Warren, KJ (1990). The power and promise of ecofeminism. Environmental Ethics 12, 125–146.
The power and promise of ecofeminism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

White, L (1968). The historical root of our ecological crisis. Science 155, 1203–1207.

Williams JL (2004) The value of genome mapping for the genetic conservation of cattle. In ‘Farm animal genetic resource’. (Eds G Simm, B Villanueva, S Townsend). (British Society for Animal Science: Nottingham, UK)

Young CR (2011) Embryo cryopreservation in food animal species. In ‘Encyclopedia of biotechnology in agriculture and food’. (Eds DR Heldman, DG Hoover, MB Weelher). (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Zimdahl RL (2006) ‘Agriculture’s ethical horizon’. Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA)