Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Factors affecting fertilisation and early embryo quality in single- and superovulated dairy cattle

Roberto Sartori A D , Michele R. Bastos B and Milo C. Wiltbank C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP 13418-900, Brazil.

B Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP 18618-000, Brazil.

C Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: sartori@esalq.usp.br

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 22(1) 151-158 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD09221
Published: 8 December 2009

Abstract

Data on fertilisation and embryo quality in dairy cattle are presented and the main factors responsible for the low fertility of single-ovulating lactating cows and embryo yield in superovulated dairy cattle are highlighted. During the past 50 years, the fertility in high-producing lactating dairy cattle has decreased as milk production increased. Recent data show conception rates to first service to be approximately 32% in lactating cows, whereas in heifers it has remained above 50%. Fertilisation does not seem to be the principal factor responsible for the low fertility in single-ovulating cows, because it has remained above 80%. Conversely, early embryonic development is impaired in high-producing dairy cows, as observed by most embryonic losses occurring during the first week after fertilisation. However, in superovulated dairy cattle, although fertilisation failure is more pronounced, averaging approximately 45%, the percentage of fertilised embryos viable at 1 week is quite high (>70%). Among the multifactorial causes of low fertility in lactating dairy cows, high feed intake associated with low concentrations of circulating steroids may contribute substantially to reduced embryo quality. Fertilisation failure in superovulated cattle may be a consequence of inappropriate gamete transport due to hormonal imbalances.

Additional keywords: bovine, fertility, nutrition, reproductive hormones, stress.


References

Ahmad, N. , Schrick, F. N. , Butcher, R. L. , and Inskeep, E. K. (1995). Effect of persistent follicles on early embryonic losses in beef cows. Biol. Reprod. 52, 1129–1135.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS | Sartori R., Suarez-Fernandez C. A., Sullivan L. N., Geiger L. N., Guenther J. N., and Wiltbank M. C. (2003b). Fertilization rate and embryo quality in superovulated Holstein heifers and lactating cows artificially inseminated in the body of the uterus or in the tip of the uterine horns. Theriogenology 59, 533. [Abstract]

Sartori, R. , Haughian, J. M. , Shaver, R. D. , Rosa, G. J. , and Wiltbank, M. C. (2004a). Comparison of ovarian function and circulating steroids in estrous cycles of Holstein heifers and lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 905–920.
PubMed |  CAS |

Sartori, R. , Souza, A. H. , Guenther, J. N. , Caraviello, D. Z. , Geiger, L. , Schenk, J. , and Wiltbank, M. C. (2004b). Fertilization rate and embryo quality in superovulated Holstein heifers artificially inseminated with X-sorted or unsorted sperm. Anim. Reprod. 1, 86–90.


Sartori, R. , Gumen, A. , Guenther, J. N. , Souza, A. H. , Caraviello, D. Z. , and Wiltbank, M. C. (2006). Comparison of artificial insemination versus embryo transfer in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 65, 1311–1321.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

Schenk, J. L. , Suh, T. K. , and Seidel, G. E. (2006). Embryo production from superovulated cattle following insemination of sexed sperm. Theriogenology 65, 299–307.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

Souza, A. H. , Sartori, R. , Guenther, J. N. , Caraviello, D. , Monson, R. , and Wiltbank, M. C. (2007). Superovulatory response of Holstein heifers to two different doses of FSH and inseminated with combined semen from high fertility bulls or commercial semen. Anim. Reprod 4, 70–76.


Spalding, R. W. , Everett, R. W. , and Foote, R. H. (1975). Fertility in New-York artificially inseminated Holstein herds in dairy-herd improvement. J. Dairy Sci. 58, 718–723.


Stevenson, J. L. , Dalton, J. C. , Santos, J. E. , Sartori, R. , Ahmadzadeh, A. , and Chebel, R. C. (2008). Effect of synchronization protocols on follicular development and estradiol and progesterone concentrations of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 3045–3056.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

Tanabe, T. Y. , Deaver, D. R. , and Hawk, H. W. (1994). Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on estrus, ovulation, and ovum cleavage rates of dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 719–724.
PubMed |  CAS |

Velazquez, M. A. , Newman, M. , Christie, M. F. , Cripps, P. J. , Crowe, M. A. , Smith, R. F. , and Dobson, H. (2005). The usefulness of a single measurement of insulin-like growth factor-1 as a predictor of embryo yield and pregnancy rates in a bovine MOET program. Theriogenology 64, 1977–1994.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

Washburn, S. P. , Silvia, W. J. , Brown, C. H. , McDaniel, B. T. , and McAllister, A. J. (2002). Trends in reproductive performance in Southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 244–251.
PubMed |  CAS |

Wiebold, J. L. (1988). Embryonic mortality and the uterine environment in first-service lactating dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. 84, 393–399.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

Wiltbank, M. , Lopez, H. , Sartori, R. , Sangsritavong, S. , and Gumen, A. (2006). Changes in reproductive physiology of lactating dairy cows due to elevated steroid metabolism. Theriogenology 65, 17–29.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

Yaakub, H. , O’Callaghan, D. , and Boland, M. P. (1999). Effect of type and quantity of concentrates on superovulation and embryo yield in beef heifers. Theriogenology 51, 1259–1266.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |