24 EVALUATION OF THE PREGNANCY RATE OF FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIALLY INSEMINATED BOS INDICUS COWS USING HETEROSPERMIC AND MONOSPERMIC SEMEN
J. P. Detomini A , R. R. Tirloni A , C. V. Araujo A and L. R. Martins AUniversity of Mato Grosso, Sinop, Brazil
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 25(1) 159-159 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv25n1Ab24
Published: 4 December 2012
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish a comparison between heterospermic and monospermic semen on the pregnancy rate of fixed-time AI Bos indicus cows. The experiment was conducted in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, during December 2010 and February 2011. Multiparous (n = 173) and primiparous (n = 204) Nelore cows, 45 ± 15 days postpartum, were evaluated on body condition score (BCS; score 1 to 9), and those that presented BCS between 5 and 8 were selected. Two protocols of estrous cycle synchronization were performed (PeCG and Pshang). Synchronization of the estrous cycle was achieved with the aid of the following protocol: on Day 0, all animals were treated with a progesterone vaginal implant with 1.9 g of progesterone combined with an IM injection of 2 mg of estradiol benzoate. On Day 7, an IM injection of 12.5 mg of dinoprost was administered. On Day 9, implants were withdrawn and the animals received an IM injection of 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate. On Day 9, part of the animals (n = 222) received an IM injection of 300 IU mg of eCG (PeCG) and the other part (n = 155) had their calves removed for 48 hours (Pshang). All animals were inseminated 46 to 52 h after the end of the protocol. Cows were allocated randomly in 4 groups according to the donor male sample in the semen straw and groups were designated as MA (monospermic straw from bull A; n = 110), MB (monospermic straw from bull B; n = 102), MC (monospermic straw from bull C; n = 108), and HT (heterospermic sample from bulls A, B, and C; n = 57). Commercially available semen straws from Aberdeen Angus donors were used (ABS Pecplan, Brazil). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed 35 days after AI using real-time ultrasonography. Results are summarized in Table 1. There was no statistical difference between MA, MB, MC, and HT in any group according to the chi-square test (P > 0.05). However, there was a remarkable difference in pregnancy rates among the 3 bulls tested considering both protocols, probably due to the variation in the ovulation moment.
|
