Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

252 COMPARISON OF TWO SPERM SEPARATION PRODUCTS FOR USE IN BOVINE IVF

J. Pryor A , S. Romo B , D.D. Varner C , K. Hinrichs C and C.R. Looney A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A OvaGenix, Navasota, TX 77818, USA

B FES-C, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

C College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Email: romo@servidor.unam.mx

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17(2) 276-276 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv17n2Ab252
Submitted: 1 August 2004  Accepted: 1 October 2004   Published: 1 January 2005

Abstract

In commercial bovine in vitro fertilization (IVF) companies, there is a continuous need to improve results. Efforts to maximize in vitro embryo production have included modifications in the use of sperm separation gradients. The development of commercially available sperm centrifugation gradients represents a new possibility of increasing the number of viable sperm that can be obtained from low concentration (fresh or frozen, sexed or unsexed) semen samples in order to improve the efficiency of the IVF system to make embryo production as efficient as possible. The objective of this study was to compare two different separation gradients, as follows: Group 1: Percoll (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), in 45% and 90% gradients; Group 2: EquiPure (Nidacon, Gathenburg, Sweden), in top and bottom layers. Before and after separation, sperm were evaluated at 200× magnification for total motility, and then stained to assess viability at 400× with fast-green/eosin stain (Sigma). Sperm separation was performed using frozen/thawed semen from one bull. Semen was separated by centrifugation at 200g for 30 min in both density gradients. Results obtained from Groups 1 and 2 were compared by chi-square test. Sperm separation with Percoll yielded lower numbers of sperm (average sperm concentration after separation of 92 × 106, vs. 159 × 106 sperm/mL for EquiPure; P < 0.05) but resulted in higher motility (60% vs. 39%, respectively; P < 0.05) of separated sperm. Rates of live sperm cells were not significantly different between groups (69.5% vs. 70%, respectively; P > 0.1). These results indicate that the commercial separation medium EquiPure may be associated with higher sperm concentration levels but with lowered sperm motility when compared to Percoll for bovine sperm separation. However, Equipure provided similar percentages of live sperm when compared to Percoll, which is currently used in our laboratory.