263 USE OF PORCINE PARTHENOTES AND GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING USING MICROARRAYS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF IMPRINTED GENES

Abstract

Genomic imprinting arises from differential epigenetic markings including DNA methylation and histone modifications and results in one allele being expressed in a parent-of-origin specific manner. For further insight into the porcine epigenome, gene expression profiles of parthenogenetic (PRT; two maternally derived chromosome sets) and biparental embryos (BP; one maternal and one paternal set of chromosomes) were compared using microarrays. Comparison of the expression profiles of the two tissue types permits identification of both maternally and paternally imprinted genes and thus the degree of conservation of imprinted genes between swine and other mammalian species. Diploid porcine parthenogenetic fetuses were generated using follicular oocytes (BOMED, Madison, WI, USA). Oocytes with a visible polar body were activated using a single square pulse of direct current of 50 V/mm for 100 ¼s and diploidized by culture in 10 ¼g/mL cycloheximide for 6 h to limit extrusion of the second polar body. Following culture, BP embryos obtained by natural matings, and PRT embryos, were surgically transferred to oviducts on the first day of estrus. Fetuses recovered at 28-30 days of gestation were dissected to separate viscera including brain, liver, and placenta; the visceral tissues were then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Porcine fibroblast tissue was obtained from the remaining carcass by mincing, trypsinization, and plating cells in ±-MEM. Total RNA was extracted from frozen tissue or cell culture using RNA Aqueous kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Gene expression differences between BP and PRT tissues were determined using the GeneChip^® Porcine Genome Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) containing 23 256 transcripts from Sus scrofa and representing 42 genes known to be imprinted in human and/or mice. Triplicate arrays were utilized for each tissue type, and for PRT versus BP combination. Significant differential gene expression was identified by a linear mixed model analysis using SAS 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Storey's q-value method was used to correct for multiple testing at q d 0.05. The following genes were classified as imprinted on the basis of their expression profiles: In fibroblasts, ARHI, HTR2A, MEST, NDN, NNAT, PEG3, PLAGL1, PEG10, SGCE, SNRPN, and UBE3A; in liver, IGF2, PEG3, PLAGL1, PEG10, and SNRPN; in placenta, HTR2A, IGF2, MEST, NDN, NNAT, PEG3, PLAGL1, PEG10, and SNRPN; and in brain, none. Additionally, several genes not known to be imprinted in humans/mice were highly differentially expressed between the two tissue types. Overall, utilizing the PRT models and gene expression profiles, we have identified thirteen genes where imprinting is conserved between swine and humans/mice, and several candidate genes that represent potentially imprinted genes. Presently, our efforts are focused in the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to more carefully evaluate the behavior of these genes in normal and abnormal gestations and to test whether the candidate genes are indeed imprinted.

This research was supported by USDA-CSREES grant 524383 to J. P. and B. F.