Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Strategies for the isolation and characterization of bovine embryonic stem cells

RA Cherny, TM Stokes, J Merei, L Lom, MR Brandon and RL Williams

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 6(5) 569 - 575
Published: 1994

Abstract

The practical application of advanced breeding technologies and genetic manipulation of domestic animals is dependent on the efficient and routine isolation of embryonic stem (ES) cell lines from these species. ES cell lines of proven totipotency have thus far been isolated only from the mouse. Murine ES cells can be identified by a number of criteria including morphology and characteristics in culture, the presence of specific markers, differentiative capacity and contribution to chimaeras. Reported cell lines derived from ruminant preimplantation embryos do not stably exhibit these characteristics. As demonstrated for the mouse, primordial germ cells may provide an alternative source for pluripotential cell lines. The isolation, culture and preliminary characterization of bovine primordial germ cell-derived (PGCd) cells are described in this paper. The PGCd cells are capable of differentiation in vitro and display murine ES cell markers including alkaline phosphatase. With farm animals, long generation intervals and small numbers of offspring make it important to develop techniques for evaluating chimaeric embryos in vitro before embarking on expensive in vivo programmes. A method for labelling putative pluripotential cells with a fluorochrome marker to follow the fate of such cells was developed. Labelled PGCd cells were injected into blastocysts and the chimaeric embryos were monitored in vitro. Preliminary results demonstrate that the labelled PGCd cells incorporate preferentially within the inner cell mass of the host blastocyst.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9940569

© CSIRO 1994

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions

View Altmetrics