Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

FSH and LH receptor concentrations in large ovarian follicles of beef cows in high and low levels of body condition at nine weeks post partum

SM Rhind, TA Bramley, IA Wright and SR McMillen

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 4(5) 515 - 522
Published: 1992

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine whether or not the effect of body condition at parturition, and thereafter, on the duration of the post-partum anoestrous period was mediated through differences in gonadotrophin receptor concentrations in the ovarian follicles. Two groups of cows were fed to achieve body condition scores of > or = 2.75 (H; n = 14) or < or = 2.00 (L; n = 15) at parturition (this had led to differences in the duration of post-partum anoestrus in previous experiments) and then fed to maintain liveweight and condition until ovariectomy at nine weeks post partum. There was no effect of body condition on the mean (+/- s.e.) number of large (> or = 8 mm diameter) follicles per cow (3.0 +/- 0.27) but a greater proportion of the follicles of H cows, compared with L cows, was oestrogenic (secreting > 250 pg oestradiol h-1 in culture) (0.75 v. 0.5; chi 2 = 3.40; P = 0.06). Mean concentrations (pg hormone bound per mg protein) of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) receptors in both granulosa (H, 157.3; L, 136.6; standard error of difference (s.e.d.) = 27.2) and thecal tissue (H, 4.14; L, 4.35; s.e.d. = 1.66) were similar for H and L cows. There was no difference associated with treatment in luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor concentrations in either granulosa (H, 40.3; L, 37.2; s.e.d. = 6.67) or thecal tissue (H, 48.9; L, 48.0; s.e.d. = 6.03). The concentration of FSH receptors in granulosa tissue was lower in non-oestrogenic follicles than in oestrogenic follicles (80.0 v. 188.1; s.e.d. = 40.4; P < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9920515

© CSIRO 1992

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions