Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reproductive cycles of farmed female chital deer (Axis axis)

G. E. Mylrea, R. C. Mulley, A. W. English and G. Evans

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 11(3) 167 - 174
Published: 1999

Abstract

Studies were conducted on chital deer hinds (Axis axis) living in a temperate region to advance the understanding of the patterns of reproduction of a tropical cervid species. The hinds exhibited regular patterns of oestrus cyclicity throughout the year as evidenced by concentrations of serum progesterone mon-itored over a 14-month period, and detection of behavioural oestrus by vasectomized stags. The mean length of the oestrous cycle was 18.0 $plusmn; 0.7 days (range, 12–23 days). Profiles of serum progesterone showed con-centrations of <0.5 ng mL-1 at the time of oestrus, which rose to a peak (range 1.5–5.0 ng mL-1) about Day 13, and then declined to low concentrations at the next oestrus. Observations following parturition showed that the first detected oestrus occurred at a mean (± SEM) time of 26.9 ± 3.0 days later for seven of nine hinds. The mean length of the oestrous cycle after the first post-partum oestrus was 16.6 ± 1.0 days (range 7–20 days). The presence of a stag may influence the length of the post-partum period in chital deer hinds, and hinds in contact with a stag in this study had a significantly shorter interval from parturition to first ovu-lation (P<0.01) compared with hinds not in contact with a stag. By 7 weeks post partum a corpus luteum was detected in 93% of hinds. In comparison only 43% of hinds with no stag contact had a corpus luteum by 7 weeks post partum. It is suggested that the tendency towards seasonal calving in the study population may be related more to male than female factors.

Keywords: oestrous cycles, post partum, progesterone.

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD99048

© CSIRO 1999

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions