Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relationship between motility and oxygen consumption of sperm from the cauda epididymides of the rat

R. N. Murdoch, R. C. Jones, V. L. Armstrong and J. Clulow

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 11(2) 87 - 94
Published: 1999

Abstract

The oxygen consumption of rat sperm was low (2.7 µL O2 108 sperm–1h–1) in caudal epidi-dymal semen (CES) when stimulation of motility was avoided. The addition of 1 µL of Krebs Ringer phosphate buffer (KRP) to 40 µL of CES (CES : KRP = 40 : 1) did not activate motility, but stimulated oxygen consumption 2-fold. Inclusion of 1–5 mМ glucose, acetate, pyruvate or lactate in the KRP further stimulated respiration rate (up to 4.3-fold) without activating motility, but respiration was reduced when 2- deoxyglucose replaced energy substrates. Inclusion of dibutyryl cAMP (1 mM) activated sperm motility in all samples and stimulated oxygen consumption 2.9-fold. Dilution of CES at the ratio of CES : KRP = 40 : 1000 also activated sperm motility and stimulated respiration rate 2.9-fold. The combined effect of dibutyryl cAMP and glucose in stimulating respiration was greater than their individual effects. However, the response to cAMP or substrates was not altered by incubation in KRP containing either 0 or 0.5 mM Ca2+. It was concluded that the motility and metabolism of rat epididymal sperm are suppressed in vivo. Respiration can be stimulated by a small (1.025-fold) dilution and further stimulated by the inclusion of energy substrate, without activating motility. However, a larger dilution or inclusion of cAMP activated motility and simultaneously stimulated metabolism, with exogenous substrate being required to stimulate respiration to the maximum rate. This suggests that prior to activation, the rate of oxygen consumption and sperm motility are not coupled.

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD99039

© CSIRO 1999

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions