Incidence, causes and consequences of pregnancy failure in viviparous lizards: implications for research and conservation settings
Kelly M. Hare A B and Alison Cree AA Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: kelly.hare@otago.ac.nz
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 22(5) 761-770 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD09195
Submitted: 19 August 2009 Accepted: 21 November 2009 Published: 7 April 2010
Abstract
Research on the causes of pregnancy failure in vertebrates has historically been mammal-focussed. However, live-birth (viviparity) has evolved multiple times, and is present in all other vertebrate taxa except Aves and Agnatha. Viviparous lizards (O. Squamata, excluding snakes and amphisbaenians) provide a valuable experimental group when studying major evolutionary events and some are also species of high conservation value. Consequently, both researchers and herpetoculturists often require high reproductive output from captive-held lizards. We reviewed the literature to determine potential or known causes of pregnancy failure for captive lizards. Pregnancy success across species averages ~86%, but varies extensively and does not appear to be related to embryonic stage when brought into captivity or level of placentation. Causes of pregnancy failure also vary among species, but correct thermal environments are vital to success, and providing adequate nutrition before vitellogenesis increases the number of viable offspring. A coordinated sequence of hormonal changes involving both pro-pregnancy and pro-labour factors is important for successful pregnancies, although uncertainty remains around the maternal concentrations of corticosterone that allow successful development. Several research areas commonly studied in mammals have yet to be explored or fully addressed in pregnant lizards, including impacts of toxins, parasites, UV light and nutritional quality. As viviparity has evolved over 100 times in lizards, and many different levels of placentation exist, pregnant lizards provide valuable models for studies in ecology and evolution and offer a useful comparison for studies on other viviparous vertebrates.
Additional keywords: captivity, embryo, gestation, lecithotrophy, placentotrophy, reptile.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to K. A. Miller, members of the Cree laboratory and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the draft manuscript, K. Miller for artistic assistance, J. R. Stewart and M. B. Thompson for helpful correspondence on placentation in lizards, and D. G. Blackburn for his pers. comm. on placentation in Sceloporus jarrovi. This work was supported by a Foundation for Research Science and Technology New Zealand Science and Technology Postdoctoral Fellowship to K. M. Hare.
Anderson, M. L. , Barr, B. C. , and Conrad, P. A. (1994). Protozoal causes of reproductive failure in domestic ruminants. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 10, 439–461.
| PubMed | CAS |
Atkins, N. M. , and Wapstra, E. (2004). Successful treatment of a mite infestation in gravid spotted snow skinks (Niveoscincus ocellatus). Herpetofauna. 34, 66–69.
Downes, S. J. , and Shine, R. (1999). Do incubation-induced changes in a lizard’s phenotype influence its vulnerability to predators? Oecologia 120, 9–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guillette, L. J. (1995). Endocrine-disrupting environmental contaminants and developmental abnormalities in embryos. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 1, 25–36.
| CAS |
Hoare, J. M. , and Hare, K. M. (2006). The impact of brodifacoum on non-target wildlife: gaps in knowledge. N. Z. J. Ecol. 30, 157–167.
Zeh, J. A. , and Zeh, D. W. (2001). Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim. Behav. 61, 1051–1063.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
