Characterisation of pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM) and relationships between PGFM pulses and luteal blood flow before, during, and after luteolysis in mares
O. J. Ginther A B D , B. L. Rodrigues A , J. C. Ferreira A , R. R. Araujo A C and M. A. Beg BA Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, WI 53528, USA.
B Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
C Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: ginther@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20(6) 684-693 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD08077
Submitted: 16 April 2008 Accepted: 26 May 2008 Published: 9 July 2008
Abstract
Blood collections for characterising 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM) pulses in mares and colour-Doppler examinations for estimating percentage of corpus luteum with blood-flow signals were done hourly for a 24-h session on Day 15 (ovulation = Day 0; n = 13 mares) or during 12-h sessions from Days 12 to 16 (n= 10 mares). Luteolysis was defined as extending from the beginning of a precipitous decrease in progesterone until progesterone was <2 ng mL–1. Comparisons were made among preluteolysis, luteolysis, and postluteolysis. Greater prostaglandin F2α activity (mean PGFM concentration per session) occurred during luteolysis than during preluteolysis and postluteolysis. Statistically-detected PGFM pulses were smaller during preluteolysis with a highly variable interval from the last pulse to the beginning of luteolysis. Either two or three pulses were detected in each 24-h session during luteolysis and postluteolysis, after excluding three of eight sessions with no pulses during postluteolysis. Statistically, 17% of pulses during postluteolysis were prominent outliers. The nadir-to-nadir interval during a pulse (5 h), the peak-to-peak interval between pulses (9 h), and the resulting 4-h gap between pulses were similar during and after luteolysis. The decrease in progesterone encompassed the PGFM pulses, without a detectable fluctuation during a pulse. The percentage of corpus luteum with blood-flow signals did not change during the ascending portion of a PGFM pulse and decreased within 2 or 3 h after the peak, even during preluteolysis. Results indicated that a reported increase in luteal blood flow in heifers during the ascending portion of a PGFM pulse does not occur in mares.
Additional keyword: corpus luteum.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, WI, USA (Projects P1-BLR-07 and P2-BLR-07). The authors thank W. W. Thatcher, University of Florida, for a gift of PGFM antiserum and advice on the PGFM assay, and Pfizer Animal Health, NY for a gift of Lutalyse.
Acosta, T. J. , Yoshizawa, N. , Ohtani, M. , and Miyamoto, A. (2002). Local changes in blood flow within the early and midcycle corpus luteum after prostaglandin F2α injection in the cow. Biol. Reprod. 66, 651–658.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Donadeu, F. X. , and Ginther, O. J. (2002). Follicular waves and circulating concentrations of gonadotrophins, inhibin and oestradiol during the anovulatory season in mares. Reproduction 124, 875–885.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Ginther, O. J. , and Utt, M. D. (2004). Doppler ultrasound in equine reproduction: principles, techniques, and potential. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 24, 516–526.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kindahl, H. , Edqvist, L. E. , Bane, A. , and Granström, E. (1976a). Blood levels of progesterone and 15-keto-13, 14-dihydroprostaglandin F2α during the normal oestrous cycle and early pregnancy in heifers. Acta Endocrinol. (Copenh.) 82, 134–149.
| PubMed |
Schams, D. , and Berisha, B. (2004). Regulation of corpus luteum function in cattle – an overview. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 39, 241–251.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Shand, N. , Irvine, C. H. G. , Turner, J. E. , and Alexander, S. L. (2000). A detailed study of hormonal profiles in mares at luteolysis. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 56, 271–279.
Shirasuna, K. , Asaoka, H. , Acosta, T. J. , Wijayagunawardane, M. P. B. , Ohtani, M. , Hayashi, M. , and Miyamoto, A. (2004). Real-time relationships in intraluteal release among prostaglandin F2α, endothelin-1, and angiotensin II during spontaneous luteolysis in the cow. Biol. Reprod. 71, 1706–1711.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Silvia, W. J. , Lewis, G. S. , McCracken, J. A. , Thatcher, W. W. , and Wilson, L. (1991). Hormonal regulation of uterine secretion of prostaglandin F2α during luteolysis in ruminants. Biol. Reprod. 45, 655–663.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Skarzynski, D. J. , Jaroszewski, J. J. , Bah, M. M. , Deptula, K. M. , Barszczewska, B. , Gawronska, B. , and Hansel, W. (2003). Administration of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor counteracts prostaglandin F2α induced luteolysis in cattle. Biol. Reprod. 68, 1674–1681.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Stabenfeldt, G. H. , Kindahl, H. , Hughes, J. P. , Neely, D. P. , Liu, I. , and Pascoe, D. (1981). Control of luteolysis in the mare. Acta Vet. Scand. Suppl. 77, 159–170.
| PubMed |
Utt, M. D. , Acosta, T. J. , Wiltbank, M. C. , and Ginther, O. J. (2007). Acute effects of prostaglandin F2α on systemic oxytocin and progesterone concentrations during the mid- or late-luteal phase in mares. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 97, 63–73.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Vanderwall, D. K. , Silvia, W. J. , and Fitzgerald, B. P. (1998). Concentrations of oxytocin in the intercavernous sinus of mares during luteolysis: temporal relationship with concentrations of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2alpha. J. Reprod. Fertil. 112, 337–346.
| PubMed |
Vanderwall, D. K. , Betschart, R. W. , and Squires, E. L. (2000). Effect of PGF2alpha and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGFalpha (PGFM) on corpora luteal function in nonpregnant mares. Theriogenology 53, 1263–1271.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Weems, C. W. , Weems, Y. S. , and Randel, R. D. (2006). Prostaglandins and reproduction in female farm animals. Vet. J. 171, 206–228.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |