Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of protocols for cryopreservation of rhesus monkey spermatozoa by post-thaw motility recovery and hyperactivation

S. M. Nichols A B and B. D. Bavister A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lakeshore Drive, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: snichols@uno.edu

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(7) 777-780 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06019
Submitted: 8 March 2006  Accepted: 9 July 2006   Published: 15 September 2006

Abstract

Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is useful for gene banking and for in vitro fertilisation (IVF). This study compared several published cryopreservation techniques to find the most efficient for rhesus macaques. Effectiveness was assessed by sperm longevity (post-thaw motility % and duration) and ability to hyperactivate in response to chemical activators (caffeine, dibutyryl cyclic AMP). Each ejaculate from three males was treated with four published cryopreservation protocols (Seier et al. 1993; Sanchez-Partida et al. 2000; Si et al. 2000; Isachenko et al. 2005). Upon thawing, each sub-sample was incubated either at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air with or without activators or at ~22°C in atmospheric air without activators for 0–24 h. Samples cryopreserved using one method showed zero motility and were not included in the 2 × 2 G-test statistical analysis. The other methods all demonstrated good immediate post-thaw motility rates (68%, 73% and 62% respectively) and underwent capacitation after exposure to activators. Sperm motility in each treatment decreased over time at both temperatures but overall, incubation at 22°C preserved motility better in all three methods. In summary, cryopreservation of rhesus spermatozoa using the method published by Sanchez-Partida et al. or Seier et al. appeared best, potentially supporting gene banking as well as allowing for multiple IVF uses from the same sample.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Tulane National Primate Research Center and the Caribbean Primate Research Center for providing rhesus monkey semen. This work was supported by grant numbers RR15395 and RR03640 from the National Center for Research Resources (a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NCRR or NIH.


References

Bavister, B. D. , and Andrews, J. C. (1988). A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality-control testing of water and culture media. J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo Transf. 5, 67–75.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Sokal R. R., and Rohlf F. J. (1981). ‘Biometry.’ (W.H. Freeman and Co.: San Francisco, CA, USA.)

Tollner, C. A. , Vandevoort, C. A. , Overstreet, J. W. , and Drobnis, E. Z. (1990). Cryopreservation of spermatozoa from cynomolgous monkeys (Macacca fascicularis). J. Reprod. Fertil. 90, 347–352.
PubMed | Yanagimachi R. (1994). Mammalian fertilization. In ‘The Physiology of Reproduction’. (Eds E. Knobil and J. D. Neill.) pp. 81–182. (Raven Press: New York, NY, USA.)

Younis, A. I. , Rooks, B. , Khan, S. , and Gould, K. G. (1998). The effects of antifreeze peptide III (AFP) and insulin transferrin selenium (ITS) on cryopreservation of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) spermatozoa. J. Androl. 19, 207–214.
PubMed |