
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Milazzotto, M. P. 
A1  - Feitosa, W. B. 
A1  - Simões, R. 
A1  - Mendes, C. M. 
A1  - Assumpção, M. E. O. A. 
A1  - Visintin, J. A. 
T1  - 315 EFFICIENCY OF CHEMICAL OR ELECTRICAL ACTIVATION OF BOVINE OOCYTES
JF  - Reproduction, Fertility and Development
JO  - Reprod. Fertil. Dev.
Y1  - 2005
VL  - 18
IS  - 2
SP  - 265
EP  - 265
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/RDV18N2AB315 
N2  - Activation of in vitro matured oocytes is essential for the success of nuclear transfer embryo production. Oocyte activation is promoted by the release of intracellular calcium and influx of extracellular ions, and can be chemically induced by calcium ionophores such as A23187 (CA) or ionomycin (IO). Electrical stimulation (EL) is an essential stage in nuclear transfer protocols for the fusion of enucleated oocytes with the donor's cell nucleus. Moreover, EL can be used as an alternative method to induce calcium influx through the formation of pores in the plasma membrane. This work aimed to evaluate the effect of electrical pulse vs the use of different calcium ionophores (A23187 or ionomycin) as primary agents of bovine oocyte activation, with or without the addition of BSA, on the rate of blastocyst formation and blastocyst quality. BSA was used to quench the activation process after a 5-min exposure to CA or IO. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were matured in TCM-199 medium with FCS and hormones for 18 h at 38.5°C and 5% CO2 in air. After removal of cumulus cells, oocytes presenting the first polar body were selected and maintained in SOFaa medium to complete 24 h of maturation. They were then divided into five treatments groups 1-CA (CA 5 mM, 5 min); 2-CAB (CA 5 mM, 5 min; BSA, 5 min); 3-IO (IO 5 mM, 5 min); 4-IOB (IO 5 mM, 5 min; BSA, 5 min); and 5-EL (EL 1.5 kV/cm, 20 µs, 2 pulses). After treatments, oocytes were kept in 6-dimethylaminopurine for 3 h and cultured in SOFaa medium for 7 days at 38.5°C and 5% CO2 in air. Rates of cleavage and blastocyst were evaluated respectively on Days 2 and 7 of culture. To evaluate embryo quality, Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide staining was used. Data were evaluated by ANOVA and submitted to LSD test for embryo rates and t-test for embryo quality. Four replicates were carried out with a total of 89 oocytes per treatment. There was a difference (P < 0.05) in rate of development to blastocyst between treatments 1-CA (54.4%a), 3-IO (51.4%a), and 5-EL (54.5%a) compared with 4-IOB (18.3%b). Treatment 2-CAB (39.8%ab) did not show any difference from the others. There was no difference (P > 0.05) among treatments in total number of cells: 1-CA (63.1a), 2-CAB (57.2a), 3-IO (60.9a), 4-IOB (72.4a), and 5-EL (58.4a). However, there was a difference (P < 0.01) in the percentage of viable cells between treatments 1-CA (49.9%a), 2-CAB (45.8%a), 3-IO (64.9%a), and 4-IOB (50.9%a) in comparison to 5-EL (82.7%b). In conclusion, BSA, when associated with IO, had a negative effect on embryonic developmental rates. The different calcium ionophores used and the BSA did not improve embryo quality. Although there were no significant differences between electrical and chemical activation on the rate of blastocyst formation, it is important to point out that higher quality embryos were achieved by using electrical activation. This work was supported by FAPESP 03/00156-9. 
ER  -

