121 Synchronisation of ovulation in lactating dairy cows following a lengthened proestrus in an estradiol/progesterone-based protocol
A. Macagno B , J. C. Tschopp A and G. A. Bó A BA Instituto de Reproduccion Animal Cordoba (IRAC), Paraje Pozo del Tigre, Gral. Paz, Cordoba, Argentina
B Instituto A.P. de Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Universidad Nacional de Villa María, Villa del Rosario, Cordoba, Argentina
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 34(2) 297-298 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv34n2Ab121
Published: 7 December 2021
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the IETS
Two experiments evaluated treatments for synchronisation of ovulation in lactating dairy cows following the conventional oestradiol/progesterone (P4)-based protocol in which oestradiol cypionate (ECP) is administered at the time of removal of a P4 device and cows undergo timed AI (TAI) 48 to 60 h later (short proestrus, Control) and two prolonged proestrus protocols (J-Synch), in which ECP is not administered and cows undergo TAI 72 to 84 h later. Multiparous Holstein cows with a body condition score of 2.9 ± 0.1 (1 to 5 scale), 146.7 ± 4.4 days in milk, producing 41.2 ± 0.6 kg of milk per day and housed in a dry-lot system with total mixed ration feeding were randomly allocated to one of three synchronisation treatments. All cows had a CL or a follicle >10 mm in diameter, detected by ultrasonography. On Day 0, all cows received 2 mg oestradiol benzoate (Oestradiol, Over) and a vaginal device containing 1 g of progesterone (P4; Sincrover, Over). The P4 device was removed on Day 6 in the J-Synch 6 group, on Day 7 in the J-Synch 7 group, and on Day 8 in the Control group. All cows received 150 µg of D-cloprostenol (Prostal, Over) and 400 IU of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG; Novormon, Zoetis) at the time of P4 device removal, and cows in the Control group also received 1 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP; Estrocinc, Over) at the same time. All cows were tail painted for oestrus detection. In experiment 1, cows (n = 14 per group) were monitored by ultrasonography every 12 h from P4 device removal to determine the time of ovulation. In experiment 2, cows (n = 573) with >30% of the tail-paint rubbed off by 72 h (J-Synch groups) or 48 h (Control group) after P4 device removal, were inseminated at that time, whereas those not in oestrus received 10 µg of Buserelin (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, Gestar, Over) and underwent TAI 12 h later. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was determined by ultrasonography 30 days later. Data were analysed using the GLM mixed procedure for continuous data in experiment 1 and for binary data in experiment 2 (InfoStat, 2019). In experiment 1, the interval from P4 device removal to ovulation was longer (P < 0.05) in the J-Synch groups (J-Synch 6: 102.0 ± 3.7 h, and J-Synch 7: 99.0 ± 3.7 h) than in the Control group (78.0 ± 4.1 h), but the diameter of the ovulatory follicle did not differ (P > 0.2) among groups (13.4 ± 1.0, 11.9 ± 1.0 and 12.1 ± 1.1 mm for the J-Synch 6, J-Synch 7, and Control groups, respectively). In experiment 2, overall oestrus expression was 69.8% (400/573) and P/AI did not differ (P > 0.2) between cows in oestrus (32.2%, 129/400) and those not in oestrus (36.9%, 64/173) at the time of TAI. However, neither oestrus expression nor pregnancy rates differed among groups (J-Synch 6: 64.7%, 119/184 and 33.2%, 61/184; J-Synch 7: 70.0%, 133/190 and 32.1%, 61/190; and Control: 74.4%, 148/199 and 35.7%, 71/199). In conclusion, the three TAI protocols were equally efficacious in lactating dairy cows.