38 GENERATION OF INTERSPECIFIC CLONED BLASTOCYSTS BY ZONA PELLUCIDA-FREE NUCLEAR TRANSFER IN WILD FELIDS

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer is an assisted reproductive technique that could help to preserve endangered species. Because it is difficult to obtain wild felid oocytes, interspecific cloning using domestic cat (DC) oocytes is an alternative to produce cloned embryos in these species. The aim of this study was to evaluate different cloning strategies in the DC (Felis silvestris catus) and to use the most efficient strategy to generate wild felid embryos by interspecific cloning. First, we evaluated 3 different cloning strategies: (1) enucleation of DC oocytes with zona pellucida (ZP) followed by fusion of a DC fibroblast that was injected into the perivitelline space (ZP-enclosed group), (2) the same enucleation procedure followed by intracytoplasmic injection of a DC fibroblast (ZPi group), and (3) enucleation of ZP-free oocytes followed by adhesion and fusion of a DC fibroblast (ZP-free group). After 2 h of nuclear reprogramming, the reconstructed embryos were activated with 5 µM ionomycin and 1.9 mM DMAP, and cultured in SOF. The ZP-free embryos were cultured in wells of the well system. Embryo development among treatment groups was compared by the Fisher exact test (P ≤ 0.05). The blastocyst rates were similar among the 3 groups: 11.1% (2/18), 11.1% (5/45), and 12.7% (9/71), for ZP-enclosed, ZPi, and ZP-free, respectively. However, the quantity of reconstructed embryos after the procedure was higher in the ZP-free clones because of a higher fusion rate (82.7 vs. 25.4%) and the use of a less-invasive technique than the injection. Moreover, the percentage of expanded blastocysts was also higher (0, 16.2, and 77.8% for ZP-enclosed, ZPi, and ZP-free, respectively). Parthenogenetic controls, with and without ZP, did not differ in blastocyst rates: 47.7% (42/88) and 49.4% (38/77), respectively. After this, the ZP-free strategy was chosen for the successive experiment. In experiment 2, the wild felid species selected for interspecific cloning were Bengal (a hybrid between Felis silvestris and Prionailurus bengalensis; FP group), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus; AJ group), and tiger (Panthera tigris; PT group). The morula and blastocyst rates were higher in the FP group: 34.3% (36/105), 16.2% (16/99), and 17.5% (11/63) for morulae, and 33.3% (35/105), 1% (1/99), and 3.2% (2/63) for blastocysts of FP, AJ, and PT, respectively. Additionally, total cell number and the expression pattern of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct-4) were examined in the blastocysts by immunocytochemistry. The mean total cell number in DC, FP, AJ, and PT blastocysts was 177.9 ± 53, 229 ± 40, 53, and 41, respectively. All blastocysts expressed Oct-4 but in different proportions. The percentage of cells expressing Oct-4 in DC, FP, AJ, and PT blastocysts was 48, 66, 100, and 98%, respectively. In summary, ZP-free cloning was found to be an efficient technique in DC, with potential to be used in wild felid species. We also demonstrated that DC oocytes were able to reprogram cells of other genera. This is the first report of felid ZP-free cloning and also the first time that tiger and cheetah embryos were produced by interspecific cloning.