Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

38 DNA METHYLATION IN PORCINE PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYOS DEVELOPED IN VIVO AND PRODUCED BY IN VITRO FERTILIZATION, PARTHENOGENETIC ACTIVATION, AND SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER

R. S. Deshmukh A , O. Oestrup A , E. Oestrup A , M. Vejlsted B , H. Niemann C , A. Lucas-Hahn C , B. Petersen C , J. Li D , H. Callesen D and P. Hyttel A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Basic Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;

B Department of Large Animal Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenahagen, Denmark;

C Institute of Farm Animal Genetics (FLI), Mariensee, Neustadt, Germany;

D Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 23(1) 125-125 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv23n1Ab38
Published: 7 December 2010

Abstract

DNA de- and re-methylation are crucial for reprogramming of the differentiated parental/somatic genome in the ooplasm. The presented research was aimed at analysis of the DNA methylation dynamics in porcine preimplantation embryos developed in vivo (IV) and produced in vitro by IVF, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), and parthenogenetic activation (PA). Embryos of early and late 1-cell, 2-, 4-, and 8-cell, and early and late blastocysts stages obtained by the mentioned methods were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and subjected to immunocytochemistry using anti-5MetC (Mouse monoclonal, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibody. DNA was labelled using Hoechst 33258 (Sigma, Copenhagen, Denmark). Epifluorescence microscopy (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) images were subjected to NIH imageJ software to measure the DNA methylation/DNA content signal by manually outlining the nuclei (n = 2003) of the embryos. The data were analysed using PROC-GLM statistical procedure in SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), least square means were compared and P-values were used to decide the significant differences within and between different groups of embryos. The 1-cell stages lacked active demethylation of paternal genome in IV and IVF embryos. Embryos produced under in vitro conditions presented higher levels of DNA methylation than IV. A lineage specific DNA methylation (hypermethylation of inner cell mass and hypomethylation of trophectoderm) observed in porcine IV late blastocysts was absent in PA and SCNT blastocysts despite the occurrence of de novo methylation in early blastocysts. SCNT early (50%) and late (14%) blastocysts presented DNA methylation pattern similar to IV early and late blastocysts, respectively. Concluding, DNA methylation patterns are strongly impaired under in vitro conditions in porcine preimplantation embryos.