Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Women’s perspectives of direct pharmacy access to oral contraception

Tara Dev https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-538X A * , Pip Buckingham https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-9719 A B and Danielle Mazza A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

B Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.

* Correspondence to: danielle.mazza@monash.edu

Australian Journal of Primary Health - https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22212
Submitted: 7 October 2022  Accepted: 6 June 2023   Published online: 3 July 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: Most oral contraception options require a doctor’s prescription in Australia; however, there are many models of direct pharmacy access that have been successfully implemented internationally. Despite these advancements, the most preferable OTC model for consumers is yet to be explored in the international literature, and no prior studies have determined the potential benefits of implementation in Australia. The aim of this study was to explore women’s perspectives and preferences for models of direct pharmacy access to oral contraceptive pills (OCPs).

Methods: Women participants (n = 20) aged 18–44 residing in Australia were recruited via posts on a community Facebook page and participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Interview questions were guided by Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Service Use. Data were coded and thematically analysed in NVivo 12, using an inductive process to develop themes.

Results: Participants’ perspectives and preferences in relation to direct pharmacy OCP access were characterised by: (1) the importance of autonomy, accessibility and decreasing stigma; (2) confidence and trust in pharmacists; (3) health and safety concerns regarding OTC access; and (4) the need for varying OTC models to cater for both experienced and first-time users.

Conclusion: Women’s perspectives and preferences regarding direct pharmacy OCP access can be used to inform potential pharmacy practice advancements in Australia. While direct pharmacy OCP access is at the nexus of heated political debate in Australia, the potential benefits of being able to access OCPs directly from a pharmacist are evidently salient to women. Australian women’s preferred OTC availability models were identified.

Keywords: family planning services, healthcare disparities, mental health, minority health, patient-centred care, preventive health services, primary health care, quality of health care, women’s health services.


References

Allen M (2017) ‘The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods.’ (SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks)

Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36, 1–10.
Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson L, Hartung DM, Middleton L, Rodriguez MI (2019) Pharmacist provision of hormonal contraception in the oregon medicaid population. Obstetrics & Gynecology 133, 1231–1237.
Pharmacist provision of hormonal contraception in the oregon medicaid population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Census of population and housing: Socio-Economic INdexes for Areas (SEIFA). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia.

Australian Government, Therapeutic Goods Administration (2016) Australian regulation of over-the-counter medicines. Department of Health, Australian Government.

Baum S, Burns B, Davis L, Yeung M, Scott C, Grindlay K, Grossman D (2016) Perspectives among a diverse sample of women on the possibility of obtaining oral contraceptives over the counter: a qualitative study. Women’s Health Issues 26, 147–152.
Perspectives among a diverse sample of women on the possibility of obtaining oral contraceptives over the counter: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braun V, Clarke V (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 589–597.
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braun V, Clarke V (2021) To saturate or not to saturate? questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13, 201–216.
To saturate or not to saturate? questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Buckingham PLM, Hussainy S, Soon J, et al. (2023) Improving access to quality contraceptive counselling in community pharmacy: examining the knowledge, attitudes and practices of community pharmacists in Australia. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 49, 87–96.
Improving access to quality contraceptive counselling in community pharmacy: examining the knowledge, attitudes and practices of community pharmacists in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Corscadden L, Levesque J-F, Lewis V, Breton M, Sutherland K, Weenink J-W, Haggerty J, Russell G (2017) Barriers to accessing primary health care: comparing Australian experiences internationally. Australian Journal of Primary Health 23, 223–228.
Barriers to accessing primary health care: comparing Australian experiences internationally.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dennis A, Grossman D (2012) Barriers to contraception and interest in over-the-counter access among low-income women: a qualitative study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 44, 84–91.
Barriers to contraception and interest in over-the-counter access among low-income women: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner JS, Downing DF, Blough D, Miller L, Le S, Shotorbani S (2008) Pharmacist prescribing of hormonal contraceptives: results of the direct access study. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 48, 212–226.
Pharmacist prescribing of hormonal contraceptives: results of the direct access study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Given L (2010) ‘The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research.’ (SAGE Publications Ltd: London)

Grindlay K, Grossman D (2018) Interest in over-the-counter access to a progestin-only pill among women in the United States. Women’s Health Issues 28, 144–151.
Interest in over-the-counter access to a progestin-only pill among women in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grindlay K, Burns B, Grossman D (2013) Prescription requirements and over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives: a global review. Contraception 88, 91–96.
Prescription requirements and over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives: a global review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grossman D (2015) Over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 42, 619–629.
Over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grossman D, White K, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Shedlin M, Potter JE (2011) Contraindications to combined oral contraceptives among over-the-counter compared with prescription users. Obstetrics & Gynecology 117, 558–565.
Contraindications to combined oral contraceptives among over-the-counter compared with prescription users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grossman D, Grindlay K, Li R, Potter JE, Trussell J, Blanchard K (2013) Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States. Contraception 88, 544–552.
Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris ML, Loxton D, Wigginton B, Lucke JC (2015) Recruiting online: lessons from a longitudinal survey of contraception and pregnancy intentions of young Australian women. American Journal of Epidemiology 181, 737–746.
Recruiting online: lessons from a longitudinal survey of contraception and pregnancy intentions of young Australian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hobbs MK, Taft AJ, Amir LH, et al. (2011) Pharmacy access to the emergency contraceptive pill: a national survey of a random sample of Australian women. Contraception 83, 151–158.
Pharmacy access to the emergency contraceptive pill: a national survey of a random sample of Australian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C (2017) Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health 40, 23–42.
Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Landau SC, Tapias MP, Mcghee BT (2006) Birth control within reach: a national survey on women’s attitudes toward and interest in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Contraception 74, 463–470.
Birth control within reach: a national survey on women’s attitudes toward and interest in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindh I, Skjeldestad FE, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. (2017) Contraceptive use in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 96, 19–28.
Contraceptive use in the Nordic countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manski R, Kottke M (2015) A survey of teenagers’ attitudes toward moving oral contraceptives over the counter. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 47, 123–129.
A survey of teenagers’ attitudes toward moving oral contraceptives over the counter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meredith AH, Olenik NL, Farris KB, Hudmon KS (2020a) Women’s perceptions of pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy 3, 425–432.
Women’s perceptions of pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meredith AH, Vahary EB, Wilkinson TA, Meagher CG, Vielott T, Ott MA (2020b) Adolescents’ perceptions of contraception access through pharmacies. Pharmacy 8, 53
Adolescents’ perceptions of contraception access through pharmacies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Consumer group directions: medicines practice guideline. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK.

New South Wales Health (2022) Pharmacy reform to expand community health care. NSW Government.

Parsons J, Adams C, Aziz N, Holmes J, Jawad R, Whittlesea C (2013) Evaluation of a community pharmacy delivered oral contraception service. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 39, 97–101.
Evaluation of a community pharmacy delivered oral contraception service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patton MQ (2015) ‘Qualitative evaluation and research methods.’ (SAGE publications: California)

Piquer-Martinez C, Urionagüena A, Benrimoj SI, et al. (2022) Integration of community pharmacy in primary health care: the challenge. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 18, 3444–3447.
Integration of community pharmacy in primary health care: the challenge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rafie S, Kelly S, Gray EK, Wong M, Gibbs S, Harper CC (2016) Provider opinions regarding expanding access to hormonal contraception in pharmacies. Women’s Health Issues 26, 153–160.
Provider opinions regarding expanding access to hormonal contraception in pharmacies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richters J, Fitzadam S, Yeung A, et al. (2016) Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships. Contraception 94, 548–555.
Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shotorbani S, Miller L, Blough DK, Gardner J (2006) Agreement between women’s and providers’ assessment of hormonal contraceptive risk factors. Contraception 73, 501–506.
Agreement between women’s and providers’ assessment of hormonal contraceptive risk factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Teal S, Edelman A (2021) Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: a review. JAMA 326, 2507–2518.
Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Therapeutic Goods Administration (2021) Notice of interim decisions on proposed amendments to the Poisons Standard - ACMS #34 (oral contraceptive substances). Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government, Australia.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349–357.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whitaker C, Stevelink S, Fear N (2017) The use of facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, e290
The use of facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xu H, Eisenberg DL, Madden T, Secura GM, Peipert JF (2014) Medical contraindications in women seeking combined hormonal contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 210, 210.e1–210.e5.
Medical contraindications in women seeking combined hormonal contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |