Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Requesting early removal of long-acting reversible contraception: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of doctors working in primary care

Jacqueline Ding A C , Henrietta Williams A B , Jane S. Hocking A and Jacqueline Coombe A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, L3, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: jacqueline.ding@mcri.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 27(6) 467-472 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY21054
Submitted: 4 March 2021  Accepted: 27 July 2021   Published: 19 November 2021

Abstract

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) are the most effective contraceptive methods available in Australia and are effective for between 3 and 8 years. Early LARC removal (<12 months of use) can lead to gaps in contraceptive cover, exposing women to the risk of unplanned pregnancy. This study explored the experiences of doctors working in primary care (GPs and sexual health physicians) when asked to remove LARC earlier than expected. From May to July 2020, 13 doctors in Melbourne, Australia, were interviewed. Overall, participants felt conflicted about early LARC removal requests; participants highlighted the importance of respecting patient autonomy, but many felt that patients should ideally persist with LARC longer. Participants found balancing a desire to respect patients’ autonomy with their clinical responsibility challenging. Doctors used reassurance, delaying tactics and treatment of side effects to try and prolong LARC use. However, this balancing act led many doctors to perceive a tension between themselves and their patients when early LARC removal was requested. Incorporating professional education addressing these issues may help primary care providers better anticipate and navigate the tension surrounding early LARC removal consultations and maintain effective doctor–patient relationships.

Keywords: conflict, contraceptive care, doctor–patient relationship, primary care providers.


References

Arrowsmith ME, Aicken CR, Saxena S, Majeed A (2012) Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3, CD008896
Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G (2019) Thematic Analysis. In ‘Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences’. (Ed. Liamputtong) pp. 843–60. (Springer: Singapore)

Claringbold L, Sanci L, Temple-Smith M (2019) Factors influencing young women’s contraceptive choices. Australian Journal of General Practice 48, 389–394.
Factors influencing young women’s contraceptive choices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31220890PubMed |

Connolly A, Pietri G, Yu J, Humphreys S (2014) Association between long-acting reversible contraceptive use, teenage pregnancy, and abortion rates in England. International Journal of Women’s Health 6, 961–974.
Association between long-acting reversible contraceptive use, teenage pregnancy, and abortion rates in England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25473316PubMed |

Family Planning (2015) Contraceptive discontinuation: reasons, challenges, and solutions. (Family Planning: Washington, DC, USA) Available at http://www.familyplanning2020.org/fr/node/1709#:~:text=This%20phenomenon%2C%20called%20contraceptive%20discontinuation,risk%20of%20an%20unintended%20pregnancy [Verified 3 November 2020]

Foster DG, Grossman D, Turok DK, Peipert JF, Prine L, Schreiber CA, Jackson AV, Barar RE, Schwarz EB (2014) Interest in and experience with IUD self-removal. Contraception 90, 54–59.
Interest in and experience with IUD self-removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24613370PubMed |

Goldhammer DL, Fraser C, Wigginton B, Harris ML, Bateson D, Loxton D, Stewart M, Coombe J, Lucke JC (2017) What do young Australian women want (when talking to doctors about contraception)? BMC Family Practice 18, 35
What do young Australian women want (when talking to doctors about contraception)?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28298197PubMed |

Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Frille A, Saad N, Niculescu A, Powell P (2017) Top tips to deal with challenging situations: doctor–patient interactions. Breathe 13, 129–135.
Top tips to deal with challenging situations: doctor–patient interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28620434PubMed |

Higgins JA, Kramer RD, Ryder KM (2016) Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: perceptions of young adult women. American Journal of Public Health 106, 1932–1937.
Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: perceptions of young adult women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27631741PubMed |

Hoggart L, Newton VL, Dickson J (2013) “I think it depends on the body, with mine it didn’t work”: explaining young women’s contraceptive implant removal. Contraception 88, 636–640.
“I think it depends on the body, with mine it didn’t work”: explaining young women’s contraceptive implant removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23829976PubMed |

Kallner HK, Danielsson KG (2016) Prevention of unintended pregnancy and use of contraception—important factors for preconception care. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 121, 252–255.
Prevention of unintended pregnancy and use of contraception—important factors for preconception care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27646655PubMed |

Katz SJ, Belkora J, Elwyn G (2014) Shared decision making for treatment of cancer: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Oncology Practice 10, 206–208.
Shared decision making for treatment of cancer: challenges and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24839284PubMed |

Mansour D, Korver T, Marintcheva-Petrova M, Fraser IS (2008) The effects of Implanon® on menstrual bleeding patterns. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 13, 13–28.
The effects of Implanon® on menstrual bleeding patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nilsen S, Malterud K (2017) What happens when the doctor denies a patient’s request? A qualitative interview study among general practitioners in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 35, 201–207.
What happens when the doctor denies a patient’s request? A qualitative interview study among general practitioners in Norway.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28581878PubMed |

Paterniti DA, Fancher TL, Cipri CS, Timmermans S, Heritage J, Kravitz RL (2010) Getting to “no”: strategies primary care physicians use to deny patient requests. Archives of Internal Medicine 170, 381–388.
Getting to “no”: strategies primary care physicians use to deny patient requests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20177043PubMed |

Richters J, Fitzadam S, Yeung A, Caruana T, Rissel C, Simpson JM, de Visser RO (2016) Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships. Contraception 94, 548–555.
Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27373543PubMed |

Ricketts S, Klingler G, Schwalberg R (2014) Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long‐acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low‐income women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46, 125–132.
Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long‐acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low‐income women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24961366PubMed |

Sandman L, Munthe C (2010) Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Analysis 18, 60–84.
Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19184444PubMed |

Temple-Smith M, Sanci L (2017) LARCs as first-line contraception: what can general practitioners advise young women? Australian Family Physician 46, 710

Thobani R, Jessani S, Azam I, Reza S, Sami N, Rozi S, Abrejo F, Saleem S (2019) Factors associated with the discontinuation of modern methods of contraception in the low income areas of Sukh Initiative Karachi: a community-based case control study. PLoS One 14, e0218952
Factors associated with the discontinuation of modern methods of contraception in the low income areas of Sukh Initiative Karachi: a community-based case control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31269086PubMed |

van Bruchem-Visser RL, de Beaufort ID, Mattace-Raso FUS, Kuipers EJ (2020) What to do when patients and physicians disagree? Qualitative research among physicians with different working experiences. European Geriatric Medicine 11, 659–666.
What to do when patients and physicians disagree? Qualitative research among physicians with different working experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32297273PubMed |

Yedidia MJ (2007) Transforming doctor–patient relationships to promote patient-centered care: lessons from palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 33, 40–57.
Transforming doctor–patient relationships to promote patient-centered care: lessons from palliative care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17196906PubMed |