Rural Research Capacity Building Program: capacity building outcomes
Emma Webster A C , Margaret Thomas B , Narelle Ong B and Linda Cutler AA Clinical Education and Training Institute, Rural Division (formerly NSW Institute of Rural Clinical Services and Teaching), PO Box 4061, Dubbo, NSW 2830, Australia.
B ARTD Consultants, PO Box 1167, Queen Victoria Building, Sydney, NSW 1230, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: emma.webster@gwahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 17(1) 107-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY10060
Submitted: 1 September 2010 Accepted: 17 December 2010 Published: 16 March 2011
Abstract
The Rural Research Capacity Building Program commenced in 2006 with the aim of developing research skills in rural health workers. The program was based on the capacity building principles of workforce development, organisational development, resource allocation, partnership and leadership. Qualitative methods were used to assess capacity building outcomes. A sample of candidates from the 2006 and 2007 cohorts were selected for interview using stratified random sampling and supplemental purposive sampling. Twenty-five individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with candidates, their managers and mentors. Interviews were thematically analysed. The program components of teaching, mentoring and networking led to the development of research skills in candidates undertaking the program. This workforce development resulted in workplace change, particularly where the candidate’s project was ‘close to practice’ and they had management support. The leadership shown and partnerships developed by the program managers enhanced the workforce development and organisational change outcomes. Resources, such as backfill and incidentals, were useful for candidates, but practicalities, such as availability of replacement staff, limited effectiveness. This study showed the value of using a capacity building framework and demonstrated that undertaking research on a topic close to practice positioned candidates to drive change within their organisation.
Additional keywords: organisational change.
References
Adams T, O’Leary K, Kris M, Higgins K, Graham C (2009) Epistemology is not a genitourinary condition – is it? Respirology 14, A12Bateman H, Walter F, Elliott J (2004) What happens next? Evaluation of a scheme to support primary care practitioners with a fledgling interest in research. Family Practice 21, 83–86.
| What happens next? Evaluation of a scheme to support primary care practitioners with a fledgling interest in research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14760051PubMed |
Best J (2005) Report on the National Health & Medical Research Council Rural Health Research Capacity Building Workshop. NHMRC, Alice Springs.
Birden H (2007) The researcher development program: how to extend the involvement of Australian general practitioners in research? Rural and Remote Health 7, 776
Cooke J (2005) A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Family Practice 6, 44
| A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16253133PubMed |
Crotty M (1998) ‘The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and perspective in the research process.’ (Allen Unwin: Sydney)
Dunbar J (2010) Editorial: Building capacity for rural and remote research. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 18, 133
| Editorial: Building capacity for rural and remote research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20690906PubMed |
Farmer L, Ried K, Weston K (2006) Primary Health Care Research Evaluation and Development Program 5-year Report 2001–2005. Developing a culture of research-aware and research-oriented practitioners. Department of General Practice, Flinders University, Adelaide.
Gregory G (2010) Progressing rural and remote health research. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 18, 134–136.
| Progressing rural and remote health research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20690907PubMed |
Hurst K (2003) Building a research conscious workforce. Journal of Health Organization and Management 17, 373–384.
| Building a research conscious workforce.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14628490PubMed |
Lee M, Saunders K (2004) Oak trees from acorns? An evaluation of local bursaries in primary care. Primary Health Care Research and Development 5, 93–95.
| Oak trees from acorns? An evaluation of local bursaries in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacLeod M, Dosman J, Kulig J, Medves J (2007) The development of the Canadian Rural Health Research Society: creating capacity through connection. Rural and Remote Health 7, 622
McDonald J (2009) Funding for rural health research from the Australian Research Council: A missed opportunity. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 17, 124–128.
| Funding for rural health research from the Australian Research Council: A missed opportunity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McDonald J, Murphy A (2005) Still on the outer edges? Progress towards and prospects for the development of a rural and remote evidence base for clinical practice. Paper presented at the 8th National Rural Health Conference, Alice Springs 2005. Available at http://nrha.ruralhealth.org.au/conferences/docs/8thNRHC/Papers/mcdonald_murphy.pdf [Verified 6 January 2011]
North American Primary Care Research Group (2002) North American Primary Care Research Group: What does it mean to build research capacity? Family Medicine 34, 678–684.
NSW Health Department (2001) ‘A framework for building capacity to improve health.’ (Better Health Centre: Sydney)
Patterson C (2000) An assessment of funding to support rural and remote health research in Australia. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 8, 271–279.
| An assessment of funding to support rural and remote health research in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387mtlWjsA%3D%3D&md5=4771637b8a0046da03d6a7faef119964CAS |
Ried K, Fuller J (2005) Building a culture of research dissemination in primary health care: the South Australian Experience of supporting the novice researcher. Australian Health Review 29, 6–11.
| Building a culture of research dissemination in primary health care: the South Australian Experience of supporting the novice researcher.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ried K, Farmer E, Weston K (2007) Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Family Practice 8, 19
| Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Salmon L, Curtin M, Ginivan D, Neumayer R (2007) Building Rural Research Capacity: the experiences of a Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 15, 155–158.
| Building Rural Research Capacity: the experiences of a Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith L (1997) Research general practices: what, who and why? The British Journal of General Practice 47, 83–86.
Smith H, Wright D, Morgan S, Dunleavey J, Moore M (2002) The ‘Research Spider’: a simple method of assessing research experience. Primary Health Care Research and Development 3, 139–140.
| The ‘Research Spider’: a simple method of assessing research experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strasser R (2000) Rural health research: have we turned the corner? The Australian Journal of Rural Health 8, 249–253.
| Rural health research: have we turned the corner?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387mtlSqug%3D%3D&md5=d3eb8bd214f6971d29048f4d9aaf6ce4CAS |
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, 349–357.
| Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17872937PubMed |
