South Australian Divisions of General Practice supporting diabetes care: insights from reporting data
Cecilia Moretti A D , Elizabeth Kalucy A , Ann-Louise Hordacre B and Sara Howard CA Primary Health Care Research and Information Service, Discipline of General Practice, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
B Australian Institute for Social Research, University of Adelaide, Level 4, 230 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
C Complex Chronic Disease Study, Discipline of General Practice, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: cecilia.moretti@flinders.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 16(1) 60-65 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY09057
Published: 17 March 2010
Abstract
The study used public reporting data supplied by the South Australian Divisions of General Practice to examine their role and significance in supporting diabetes care in general practice. Data sources included the Annual Survey of Divisions 2002–07, and Divisions 12-month reports against National Performance Indicators for 2006–07. Results showed that Divisions combine collaboration, practice support and GP education approaches to support optimal diabetes care within general practice. Divisions commonly described their collaborative achievements in terms of connecting general practice with other diabetes providers, services, information and resources. Practice support and educational activities, which were highly interrelated, often focussed on strengthening use of chronic disease Medical Benefit Schedule items, practice nurse roles and computer and information management systems. In this way, Divisions strengthened primary care team functioning to achieve good communication and consistent standards of care between team members. Divisions detailed a range of strategies that worked well in delivering these practice-level outcomes, with implications for wider Network learning and development. These publicly available data sources provide scope for decision makers and researchers to explore other aspects of Divisions’ roles and performance.
Additional keywords: national performance indicators, primary care.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the support provided to the PHC RIS by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, for the purposes of generating, managing and sharing information about Australian primary health care. We also wish to acknowledge the important contribution of the Divisions of General Practice Network, whose reporting data forms the basis of this study.
Del Fante P,
Allan D, Babidge E
(2006) Getting the most out of your practice. The Practice Health Atlas and business modelling opportunities. Australian Family Physician 35(1/2), 34–38.
| PubMed |
[Verified 3 August 2009]
Kalucy E,
Hordacre A-L, Patterson S
(2008) Going online – experiences with a web survey. Australian Health Review 32(2), 366–370.
| PubMed |
[Verified 13 July 2009]
Saunders M,
Schattner P, Mathews M
(2008) Diabetes ‘cycles of care’ in general practice: do government incentives help? Australian Family Physician 37(9), 781–784.
| PubMed |
Scott A, Coote W
(2007) Whither Divisions of General Practice? An empirical and policy analysis of the impact of Divisions within the Australian health care system. MJA 187(2), 95–99.
| PubMed |
Scott A, Coote W
(2009) Do regional primary-care organisations influence primary-care performance? A dynamic panel estimation. Health Economics in press. ,
Smith JA, Sibthorpe B
(2007) Divisions of general practice in Australia: how do they measure up in the international context? Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 4, 15.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
