Big data or big risk: general practitioner, practice nurse and practice manager attitudes to providing de-identified patient health data from electronic medical records to researchers
Timothy Monaghan A B , Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis
A and Rachel Canaway A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: tim.monaghan@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 26(6) 466-471 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY20153
Submitted: 22 June 2020 Accepted: 25 September 2020 Published: 9 December 2020
Abstract
Research utilising de-identified patient health information extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) from general practices has steadily grown in recent years in response to calls to increase use of health data for research and other secondary purposes in Australia. Little is known about the views of key primary care personnel on this issue, which are important, as they may influence whether practices agree to provide EMR data for research. This exploratory qualitative study investigated the attitudes and beliefs of general practitioners (GPs), practice managers (PMs) and practice nurses (PNs) around sharing de-identified EMR patient health information with researchers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants (6 GPs, 3 PMs and 2 PNs) recruited via purposive sampling from general practices in Victoria, Australia. Transcripts were coded and thematically analysed. Participants were generally enthusiastic about research utilising de-identified health information extracted from EMRs for altruistic reasons, including: positive effects on primary care research, clinical practice and population health outcomes. Concerns raised included patient privacy and data breaches, third-party use of extracted data and patient consent. These findings can provide guidance to researchers and policymakers in designing and implementing projects involving de-identified health information extracted from EMRs.
Keywords: Australia, EMR, general practice, qualitative research, use of patient records for research.
References
Australian Department of Health (2018) Framework to guide the secondary use of My Health Record system data. (Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/F98C37D22E65A79BCA2582820006F1CF/$File/MHR_2nd_Use_Framework_2018_ACC_AW3.pdf [Verified 15 April 2020]Australian Department of Health (2019a) Practice incentives program quality improvement incentive fact sheet – What practices need to know. (Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/46506AF50A4824B6CA25848600113FFF/$File/Practice-Incentives-Program-Quality-Improvement-Incentive-Fact-Sheet-what-practices-need-to-know.pdf [Verified 13 January 2020]
Australian Department of Health (2019b) Practice incentives program quality improvement incentive guidelines. (Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/46506AF50A4824B6CA25848600113FFF/$File/Practice-Incentives-Program-Quality-Improvement-Incentive-Guidelines.pdf [Verified 13 January 2020]
Australian Department of Human Services (2019) Incentives news update - November 2019. (Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.humanservices.gov.au/sites/default/files/8646-1911-inu.pdf [Verified 13 January 2020]
Australian Digital Health Agency (2019) Statistics and insights Mar 2019 to Nov 2019. (Australian Digital Health Agency: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at https://myhealthrecord.govcms.gov.au/sites/default/files/mhr_stats_marchnovember2019.pdf?v=1576471841 [Verified 13 January 2020]
Australian Digital Health Agency (2020) Choose how your data is used for research. (Australian Digital Health Agency: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at https://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/for-you-your-family/howtos/choose-how-your-data-is-used-for-research [Verified 13 January 2020]
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2018) Australia’s health 2018. Australia’s health series no. 16. AUS 221. (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/australias-health-2018/contents/table-of-contents [Verified 8 June 2020]
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.
| Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buckley BS, Murphy AW, MacFarlane AE (2011) Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners’ records: a survey of the Irish general public. Journal of Medical Ethics 37, 50–55.
| Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners’ records: a survey of the Irish general public.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21071570PubMed |
Canaway R, Boyle DI, Manski-Nankervis JE, Bell J, Hocking JS, Clarke K, Clark M, Gunn JM, Emery JD (2019) Gathering data for decisions: best practice use of primary care electronic records for research. The Medical Journal of Australia 210, S12–S16.
| Gathering data for decisions: best practice use of primary care electronic records for research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30927466PubMed |
Duckett S, Swerissen H, Moran G (2017) Building better foundations for primary care. (Grattan Institute: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Building-better-foundations-for-primary-care.pdf [Verified 13 January 2020]
Dunlevy S (2019a) GPs in cash grab with client data. Northern Territory News/Sunday Territorian 23 December 2019 [Verified 13 January 2020].
Dunlevy S (2019b) GPs put patient privacy ‘at risk’. Courier Mail 23 December 2019 [Verified 13 January 2020].
Hodgkins AJ, Mullan J, Mayne DJ, Boyages C, Bonney A (2020) Australian general practitioners’ attitudes to the extraction of research data from electronic health records. Australian Journal of General Practice 49, 145–150.
| Australian general practitioners’ attitudes to the extraction of research data from electronic health records.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32113209PubMed |
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Universities Australia (2018) National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 (Updated 2018). (National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018#block-views-block-file-attachments-content-block-1 [Verified 8 June 2020]
NPS MedicineWise (2019) General practice insights report July 2017–June 2018. (NPS MedicineWise: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at https://www.nps.org.au/assets/NPS/pdf/General-Practice-Insights-Report_2017-18.pdf [Verified 13 January 2020]
Perera G, Holbrook A, Thabane L, Foster G, Willison DJ (2011) Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80, 94–101.
| Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21167771PubMed |
Productivity Commission (2017) Data availability and use, Report No. 82, Canberra. (Productivity Commission: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/data-access/report/data-access.pdf [Verified 15 April 2020]
Robling MR, Hood K, Houston H, Pill R, Fay J, Evans HM (2004) Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. Journal of Medical Ethics 30, 104–109.
| Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14872086PubMed |
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) (2019) Practice incentives program quality improvement incentive (PIP QI) fact sheet. (Royal Australian College of General Practitioners: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://www.racgp.org.au/FSDEDEV/media/documents/Running%20a%20practice/Security/PIP-QI-factsheet.pdf [Verified 6 June 2020]
Stevenson F (2015) The use of electronic patient records for medical research: conflicts and contradictions. BMC Health Services Research 15, 124
| The use of electronic patient records for medical research: conflicts and contradictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25886266PubMed |
Stevenson F, Lloyd N, Harrington L, Wallace P (2013) Use of electronic patient records for research: views of patients and staff in general practice. Family Practice 30, 227–232.
| Use of electronic patient records for research: views of patients and staff in general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23132893PubMed |
Stone MA, Redsell SA, Ling JT, Hay AD (2005) Sharing patient data: competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care. The British Journal of General Practice 55, 783–789.
Sturgiss E, van Boven K (2018) Datasets collected in general practice: an international comparison using the example of obesity. Australian Health Review 42, 563–567.
| Datasets collected in general practice: an international comparison using the example of obesity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29860968PubMed |
Tran B, Straka P, Falster MO, Douglas KA, Britz T, Jorm LR (2018) Overcoming the data drought: exploring general practice in Australia by network analysis of big data. The Medical Journal of Australia 209, 68–73.
| Overcoming the data drought: exploring general practice in Australia by network analysis of big data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29976132PubMed |
