Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Increasing Pap smear rates at an urban Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service through translational research and continuous quality improvement

Melanie S. Dorrington A B , Ana Herceg A B C , Kirsty Douglas A B , Julie Tongs A and Marianne Bookallil A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Winnunga Nimmityjah Aboriginal Health Service, 63 Boolimba Crescent, Narrabundah, ACT 2604, Australia.

B The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: ana.herceg@winnunga.org.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 21(4) 417-422 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY14088
Submitted: 2 June 2014  Accepted: 19 October 2014   Published: 23 February 2015

Abstract

This article describes translational research (TR) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes used to identify and address barriers and facilitators to Pap smear screening within an urban Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS). Rapid Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted, informed by client surveys, a data collection tool, focus groups and internal research. There was a statistically significant increase in Pap smear numbers during PDSA cycles, continuing at 10 months follow up. The use of TR with CQI appears to be an effective and acceptable way to affect Pap smear screening. Community and service collaboration should be at the core of research in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health settings. This model is transferrable to other settings and other health issues.

Additional keywords: cervical cancer screening, continuing quality improvement, women’s health.


References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2013) Cervical screening in Australia 2010–2011. Cancer series 76. Cat. no. CAN72. (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra) Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129543402 [Verified 27 June 2013]

Bailie RS, Si D, O’Donoghue L, Dowden M (2007) Indigenous health: effective and sustainable health services through continuous quality improvement. The Medical Journal of Australia 186, 525–527.

Blomberg K, Ternestedt B, Tornberg S, Tishelman C (2008) How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical screening reason about their decision? Psycho-Oncology 17, 561–569.
How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical screening reason about their decision?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17886262PubMed |

Chamberlain J (1986) Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer. In ‘Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix’. (Eds M Hakama, AB Miller, NE Day) pp. 161–168. (Oxford University Press: Oxford)

Chong C, Frampton R, Nguyen BH, Pereira R, Porteus J, Tjiang HH, Herceg A, Harley D (2011) How can we improve Pap smear rates for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women at Winnunga (medical student research). The Australian National University, Canberra.

Conway K (1996) Attitudes to Papanicolaou smears. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 17, 189–194.
Attitudes to Papanicolaou smears.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ltFOjsA%3D%3D&md5=2dc742eacc970080f5eabadd6e8c9b66CAS | 8997684PubMed |

Coory MD, Fagan PS, Muller JM, Dunn NAM (2002) Participation in cervical cancer screening by women in rural and remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Queensland. The Medical Journal of Australia 177, 544–547.

Couzos S, Wronski I, Murray R, Cox H (1998) Augmentation of Pap smear screening of high risk Aboriginal women. Use of a computerised process tool within the Broome Aboriginal Medical Service. Australian Family Physician 27, 269–274.

Day NE (1986) The epidemiological basis for evaluating different screening policies. In ‘Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix’. (Eds M Hakama, AB Miller, NE Day) pp. 199–209. IARC Scientific Publications no. 76. (IARC, Lyon, France)

Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, Martin-Hirsch PPL, Forbes CA, Jepson RG (2011) Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD002834
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21563135PubMed |

Fylan F (1998) Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women’s attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour. The British Journal of General Practice 48, 1509–1514.

Gardner KL, Dowden M, Togni S, Bailie R (2010) Understanding the uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project. Implementation Science 5, 21–34.
Understanding the uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20226066PubMed |

Gatenby J, Herceg A, Bookalil M, Tongs J (2012) Cervical screening at Winnunga Nimmityjah Aboriginal Health Service 2007–2011: a descriptive analysis of patient participation (medical student research). The Australian National University, Canberra.

Gilles MT, Crewe S, Granites IN, Coppola A (1995) A community-based cervical screening program in a remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Public Health 19, 477–481.

Grunfeld E (1997) Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups. Canadian Medical Association Journal 157, 543–545.

Hansen BT, Hukkelberg SS, Haldorsen T, Eriksen T, Skare GB, Nygard M (2011) Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organised screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women. BMC Public Health 11, 264–276.
Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organised screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21521515PubMed |

Hunt JM, Gless GL, Straton JAY (1998) Pap smear screening at an urban Aboriginal health service: report of practice audit and an evaluation of recruitment strategies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 22, 720–725.
Pap smear screening at an urban Aboriginal health service: report of practice audit and an evaluation of recruitment strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmsFyiuw%3D%3D&md5=6d5bd29e88821b9c80e6d226da8c755dCAS | 9848971PubMed |

Kelaher M, Baigrie N, Manderson L, Moore L, Shannon C, Williams G (1999) Community perceptions of health, illness and care: identifying issues for indigenous communities. Women & Health 28, 41–61.
Community perceptions of health, illness and care: identifying issues for indigenous communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Logan L, Mcilfatrick S (2011) Exploring women’s knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation. European Journal of Cancer Care 20, 720–727.
Exploring women’s knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3Mbps1Gmsw%3D%3D&md5=65fa8d14b40679bfa821ba76bba2f300CAS | 21521388PubMed |

Mak DB, Straton JA (1993) The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women. The Medical Journal of Australia 158, 163–166.

Nygård M (2011) Screening for cervical cancer: when theory meets reality. BMC Cancer 11, 240–244.
Screening for cervical cancer: when theory meets reality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21668947PubMed |

Olesen SC, Butterworth P, Jacomb P, Tait RJ (2012) Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research. BMC Health Services Research 12, 34
Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22333392PubMed |

Panaretto KS, Manessis DDV, Larkins S, Tabrizi S, Upcroft J, Garland S (2006) Cervical smear participation and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in women attending a community-controlled Indigenous health service in North Queensland. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 30, 171–176.
Cervical smear participation and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in women attending a community-controlled Indigenous health service in North Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283ls1Oqtw%3D%3D&md5=f0c41025bf532add7588feb1d333e83cCAS | 16681340PubMed |

Pierce M, Lundy S, Palanisamy A, Winning S, King J (1989) Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening. BMJ 299, 160–162.
Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzltlSntQ%3D%3D&md5=e7e86ab371e577aa538acc8b4921379eCAS | 2504359PubMed |

Reath J, Usherwood T (1998) Improving cervical screening in a remote Aboriginal community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 22, 659–663.
Improving cervical screening in a remote Aboriginal community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmsFyjtQ%3D%3D&md5=3985f98bd64daa92c5a9c088e50ce05cCAS | 9848959PubMed |

Summers A, Fullard B (1995) Improving the coverage and quality of cervical screening: women’s views. Journal of Public Health Medicine 17, 277–281.

The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (2010) ‘QI&CPD Program 2011–2013 triennium handbook.’ (The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners: Melbourne)

Waller J, Bartoszek M, Marlow L, Wardle J (2009) Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. Journal of Medical Screening 16, 199–204.
Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20054095PubMed |

Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L, Wardle J (2012) Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 119, 26–32.
Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38%2FlslOksg%3D%3D&md5=b3a3a9bf770e949bdbbf932e55af6665CAS | 21668764PubMed |