Health partnerships: perspectives of medical practitioners in general practice, health systems and hospital settings
Elizabeth Kendall A D , Carolyn Ehrlich A , Megan Young B , Heidi Muenchberger A , Ken Wilkie C and Carole Rushton AA Centre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation, Griffith Institute of Health and Medical Research, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia.
B School of Medicine, Griffith University and Queensland Health, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia.
C Logan Beaudesert Health Coalition, Logan Division of General Practice, PO Box 831, Woodridge, Qld 4114, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: e.kendall@griffith.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 15(4) 319-325 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY09018
Published: 26 November 2009
Abstract
The pressure for medical practitioners to work collaboratively has intensified over the last few decades in most industrialised countries, including Australia. However, many barriers prevent doctors from engaging in macro-level health partnerships. If these partnership initiatives are to succeed, it is essential to understand how and why doctors participate. This paper explored the views of eighteen medical practitioners, including general practitioners (in both small and large practices), division representatives, hospital-based doctors and health system managers. The findings revealed eight key themes, which were dominated by scepticism about partnerships based on previous experiences, but juxtaposed against a strong enthusiasm for the approach. There was a significant cost for medical practitioners to engage in partnerships, either financially or in terms of workload. Their enthusiasm was based on the belief that partnerships could achieve their vision for an ideal service system. They highlighted the importance of ongoing consultation, feedback and monitoring and the need for evidence to balance enthusiasm. Partnership initiatives need to engage local medical champions to increase the profile of this approach and enlist the enthusiasm of the diverse medical community.
Butterfoss F,
Goodman R, Wandersman A
(1993) Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research 8(3), 315–330.
|
CAS |
Crossref |
PubMed |
Branson R, Armstrong D
(2004) General practitioners’ perceptions of sharing workload in group practices: a qualitative study. British Medical Journal 329, 381–385.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
de Jong JD,
Groenewegen P, Westert G
(2003) Mutual influences of general practitioners in partnerships. Social Science & Medicine 57, 1515–1524.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hudson B
(2002) Interprofessionality in health and social care: the Achilles’ heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care 16, 7–17.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Laing A,
Marnoch G,
McKee L, Reid R
(1997) Administration to innovation: the evolving management challenge in primary care. Journal of Management in Medicine 11, 71–87.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
CAS |
Lloyd J,
Powell-Davies G, Harris M
(2000) Integration between GPs and hospitals: lessons from a division hospital program. Australian Health Review 23, 134–141.
| PubMed |
CAS |
Newton J,
Eccles M, Soutter J
(1996) General practice partnerships: an exploratory review. Journal of Management in Medicine 10, 62–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
CAS |
Smith AJ, Preston D
(1996) Communications between professional groups in an NHS trust hospital. Journal of Management in Medicine 10, 31–39.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
CAS |
Whitehead C
(2007) The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate? Medical Education 41, 1010–1016.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
