Evaluation of a geriatric day rehabilitation centre: subjective and objective outcomes in community-dwelling older adults
A. Foley A B C , S. Hillier B and R. Barnard AA Centre for Physical Activity in Ageing, Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Hampstead Road, Northfield, SA 5085, Australia.
B School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia (City East), North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: amanda.foley@health.sa.gov.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 15(2) 117-122 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY08054
Published: 5 June 2009
Abstract
Pre and post testing were conducted on community-dwelling older adults referred to a geriatric day rehabilitation centre (DRC). Consecutive DRC clients were screened for inclusion over a 16-month period and were eligible if: aged 60+ years; cognitively intact; and reason for referral involved spinal or lower limb musculoskeletal impairment, disability or surgery, and/or reduced functional mobility or falls. Clients were excluded if they had a neurological disorder, or did not complete the program. Outcome measures included: lower limb strength; balance; mobility; self-reported pain; activities of daily living; and quality of life. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics and analysed using paired t-tests. Of the 137 participants recruited, 110 were female and the mean age was 79.5 ± 7.3 years. In total, 106 participants completed the DRC program and were assessed at baseline and re-assessed at discharge. The mean length of stay was 12.4 ± 2.9 weeks, with 21.4 ± 5.4 attendances. From baseline to discharge, statistically significant differences were found for all objective measures of physical functioning, balance, and for all lower limb strength tests (P < 0.0001). Glasgow Pain Questionnaire scores demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all five domains of the scale (P < 0.0001). The Barthel Index and Multi-dimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire both showed a statistically significant improvement in the level of independence in activities of daily living (ADL) (P < 0.05). The Assessment of Quality of Life Questionnaire showed a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.027). The Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale also showed a statistically significant improvement over DRC attendance (P = 0.005). The Falls Efficacy Scale showed a positive change, but the improvement was not statistically significant (P = 0.80). The study’s results indicate that community-dwelling older adults with physical disabilities and multiple comorbidities who attended the interdisciplinary geriatric DRC, significantly improved their lower limb strength, balance and physical function, and also showed significant decreases in self-reported pain, and improvements in independence in ADL and quality of life. Given the limitations of the current study, further research, in the form of high quality studies with larger sample sizes that involve direct comparisons with other forms of care or against a control group, is needed to determine whether day rehabilitation centre programs provide the optimum mode of rehabilitation for this population in the most cost effective manner.
Additional keywords: day hospital, physical function, quality of life, strength.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all of the Day Rehabilitation Centre staff for their efforts and cooperation during the recruitment and data collection phases of the project. The current study was supported by PhD scholarship funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
Berg KO,
Wood-Dauphinee SL,
Williams JI, Gayton D
(1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada 41, 304–311.
| Crossref |
[Verified April 2009]