Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Identifying the most common barriers to opioid agonist treatment in an Australian setting

Natasha Yvonne Hall A * , Long Le B , Julie Abimanyi-Ochom A , Maree Teesson C and Cathy Mihalopoulos B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia.

B Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

C Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

* Correspondence to: Natasha.hall@deakin.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 29(5) 445-454 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22269
Submitted: 1 September 2022  Accepted: 20 February 2023   Published: 20 March 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: Opioid use disorder is a public health concern in Australia. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is effective at treating and minimising harm from opioid use disorder, yet is underused in Australia due to client barriers. Although these barriers have been reported, the barriers that are most important to clients is unclear. The aim of this paper was to determine the most important OAT barriers to Australian clients.

Methods: A cross-sectional, self-completed survey was given to 204 opioid-dependent clients who attended needle and syringe sites in Australia. Participants were given 15 OAT barrier statements, which they answered using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree and 5 = strongly agree). The Likert scale data are presented using the count method and the mean Likert scores (for the whole sample and for subgroups).

Results: The two methods determined that the four most important barriers to OAT were stigma, lack of support services, no flexibility and enjoy using opioids. Furthermore, those who used prescription opioids (compared with heroin) were female or non-binary (compared with male), were not currently using OAT (compared with current OAT), were younger (compared with older) and had high dependence scores (compared with low dependence scores) were impacted more by certain OAT barriers.

Conclusions: Policies around improving support services, reducing stigma and increasing flexibility would be beneficial to reduce barriers to OAT in Australia. Second, certain groups were more vulnerable to OAT barriers, emphasising the importance to better tailor opioid treatment programs to these specific populations to increase treatment engagement.

Keywords: Australia, barriers to treatment, heroin dependence, Likert scale analysis, needle syringe sites, opioid agonist treatment, opioid use disorder, prescription opioid dependence.


References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2021b) National opioid pharmacotherapy statistics annual data collection – Table PRESCRIBER2: ratio of clients to prescriber, by prescriber type and state/territory, 2021 [Online]. (Australian Government: Canberra) Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/alcohol-other-drug-treatment-services/national-opioid-pharmacotherapy-statistics-2019/contents/prescribers [Accessed 01/02/2023]

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2022) National opioid pharmacotherapy statistics annual data collection [Online]. (AIHW: Canberra) Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/alcohol-other-drug-treatment-services/national-opioid-pharmacotherapy-statistics-2019/contents/dosing-points [Accessed 05/04/2022]

Back SE, Payne RL, Wahlquist AH, Carter RE, Stroud Z, Haynes L, Hillhouse M, Brady KT, Ling W (2011) Comparative profiles of men and women with opioid dependence: results from a national multisite effectiveness trial. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 37, 313–323.
Comparative profiles of men and women with opioid dependence: results from a national multisite effectiveness trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barnett A, Savic M, Lintzeris N, Bathish R, Arunogiri S, Dunlop AJ, Haber P, Graham R, Hayes V, Lubman DI (2021) Tracing the affordances of long-acting injectable depot buprenorphine: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences in Australia. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 227, 108959
Tracing the affordances of long-acting injectable depot buprenorphine: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-BEM (2001) Response styles in marketing research: a cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research 38, 143
Response styles in marketing research: a cross-national investigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bawor M, Dennis BB, Bhalerao A, Plater C, Worster A, Varenbut M, Daiter J, Marsh DC, Desai D, Steiner M, Anglin R, Pare G, Thabane L, Samaan Z (2015) Sex differences in outcomes of methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open 3, E344–E351.
Sex differences in outcomes of methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Booth RE, Corsi KF, Mikulich SK (2003) Improving entry to methadone maintenance among out-of-treatment injection drug users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 24, 305–311.
Improving entry to methadone maintenance among out-of-treatment injection drug users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cama E, Brener L, Wilson H, von Hippel C (2016) Internalized stigma among people who inject drugs. Substance Use & Misuse 51, 1664–1668.
Internalized stigma among people who inject drugs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chang K-C, Lin C-Y, Chang C-C, Ting S-Y, Cheng C-M, Wang J-D (2019) Psychological distress mediated the effects of self-stigma on quality of life in opioid-dependent individuals: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 14, e0211033
Psychological distress mediated the effects of self-stigma on quality of life in opioid-dependent individuals: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheng C-M, Chang C-C, Wang J-D, Chang K-C, Ting S-Y, Lin C-Y (2019) Negative impacts of self-stigma on the quality of life of patients in methadone maintenance treatment: the mediated roles of psychological distress and social functioning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 1299
Negative impacts of self-stigma on the quality of life of patients in methadone maintenance treatment: the mediated roles of psychological distress and social functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cummings AM, Gallop RJ, Greenfield SF (2010) Self-efficacy and substance use outcomes for women in single-gender versus mixed-gender group treatment. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery 5, 4–16.
Self-efficacy and substance use outcomes for women in single-gender versus mixed-gender group treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Darke S, Mills KL, Ross J, Teesson M (2011) Rates and correlates of mortality amongst heroin users: findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS), 2001–2009. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 115, 190–195.
Rates and correlates of mortality amongst heroin users: findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS), 2001–2009.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dean AJ, Saunders JB, Bell J (2011) Heroin use, dependence, and attitudes to treatment in non-treatment-seeking heroin users: a pilot study. Substance Use & Misuse 46, 417–425.
Heroin use, dependence, and attitudes to treatment in non-treatment-seeking heroin users: a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Deering DEA, Sheridan J, Sellman JD, Adamson SJ, Pooley S, Robertson R, Henderson C (2011) Consumer and treatment provider perspectives on reducing barriers to opioid substitution treatment and improving treatment attractiveness. Addictive Behaviors 36, 636–642.
Consumer and treatment provider perspectives on reducing barriers to opioid substitution treatment and improving treatment attractiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Degenhardt L, Hall W (2012) Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease. The Lancet 379, 55–70.
Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Degenhardt L, Charlson F, Ferrari A, Santomauro D, Erskine H, Mantilla-Herrara A, Whiteford H, Leung J, Naghavi M, Griswold M, Rehm J, Hall W, Sartorius B, Scott J, Vollset SE, Knudsen AK, Haro JM, Patton G, Kopec J, Carvalho Malta D, Topor-Madry R, Mcgrath J, Haagsma J, Allebeck P, Phillips M, Salomon J, Hay S, Foreman K, Lim S, Mokdad A, Smith M, Gakidou E, Murray C, Vos T (2018) The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Psychiatry 5, 987–1012.
The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DeWees TA, Mazza GL, Golafshar MA, Dueck AC (2020) Investigation into the effects of using normal distribution theory methodology for Likert scale patient-reported outcome data from varying underlying distributions including floor/ceiling effects. Value in Health 23, 625–631.
Investigation into the effects of using normal distribution theory methodology for Likert scale patient-reported outcome data from varying underlying distributions including floor/ceiling effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ezard N, Lintzeris N, Odgers P, Koutroulis G, Muhleisen P, Stowe A, Lanagan A (1999) An evaluation of community methadone services in Victoria, Australia: results of a client survey. Drug and Alcohol Review 18, 417–423.
An evaluation of community methadone services in Victoria, Australia: results of a client survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fatseas M, Auriacombe M (2007) Why buprenorphine is so successful in treating opiate addiction in France. Current Psychiatry Reports 9, 358–364.
Why buprenorphine is so successful in treating opiate addiction in France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fullerton CA, Kim M, Thomas CP, Lyman DR, Montejano LB, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, Delphin-Rittmon ME (2014) Medication-assisted treatment with methadone: assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services 65, 146–157.
Medication-assisted treatment with methadone: assessing the evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gidman W, Coomber R (2014) Contested space in the pharmacy: public attitudes to pharmacy harm reduction services in the West of Scotland. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 10, 576–587.
Contested space in the pharmacy: public attitudes to pharmacy harm reduction services in the West of Scotland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

González-Sáiz F, Domingo-Salvany A, Barrio G, Sánchez-Niubó A, Brugal MT, De La Fuente L, Alonso J (2009) Severity of dependence scale as a diagnostic tool for heroin and cocaine dependence. European Addiction Research 15, 87–93.
Severity of dependence scale as a diagnostic tool for heroin and cocaine dependence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gossop M, Bradley B, Phillips GT (1987) An investigation of withdrawal symptoms shown by opiate addicts during and subsequent to a 21-day in-patient methadone detoxification procedure. Addictive Behaviors 12, 1–6.
An investigation of withdrawal symptoms shown by opiate addicts during and subsequent to a 21-day in-patient methadone detoxification procedure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J (1995) The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction 90, 607–614.
The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gourlay J, Ricciardelli L, Ridge D (2005) Users’ experiences of heroin and methadone treatment. Substance Use & Misuse 40, 1875–1882.
Users’ experiences of heroin and methadone treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Greenfield SF, Trucco EM, McHugh RK, Lincoln M, Gallop RJ (2007) The women’s recovery group study: a stage I trial of women-focused group therapy for substance use disorders versus mixed-gender group drug counseling. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 90, 39–47.
The women’s recovery group study: a stage I trial of women-focused group therapy for substance use disorders versus mixed-gender group drug counseling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haffajee RL, Andraka-Christou B, Attermann J, Cupito A, Buche J, Beck AJ (2020) A mixed-method comparison of physician-reported beliefs about and barriers to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 15, 69
A mixed-method comparison of physician-reported beliefs about and barriers to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall NY, Le L, Majmudar I, Mihalopoulos C (2021) Barriers to accessing opioid substitution treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review from the client perspective. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 221, 108651
Barriers to accessing opioid substitution treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review from the client perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Health and Human Services Victoria (2020) Policy for maintenance pharmacotherapy for opioid dependence. Available at https://www.health.vic.gov.au/publications/policy-for-maintenance-pharmacotherapy-for-opioid-dependence [Accessed 1/03/2023]

Jamieson S (2004) Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education 38, 1217–1218.
Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones CM, McCance-Katz EF (2019) Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders among adults with opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 197, 78–82.
Co-occurring substance use and mental disorders among adults with opioid use disorder.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones NR, Nielsen S, Farrell M, Ali R, Gill A, Larney S, Degenhardt L (2021) Retention of opioid agonist treatment prescribers across New South Wales, Australia, 2001-2018: implications for treatment systems and potential impact on client outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 219, 108464
Retention of opioid agonist treatment prescribers across New South Wales, Australia, 2001-2018: implications for treatment systems and potential impact on client outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knapp TR (1990) Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy. Nursing Research 39, 121–123.
Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kwiatkowski CF, Booth RE, Lloyd LV (2000) The effects of offering free treatment to street-recruited opioid injectors. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 95, 697–704.
The effects of offering free treatment to street-recruited opioid injectors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee JA, Soutar G, Louviere J (2008) The best–worst scaling approach: an alternative to Schwartz’s values survey. Journal of Personality Assessment 90, 335–347.
The best–worst scaling approach: an alternative to Schwartz’s values survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Louviere JJ, Flynn TN, Marley AAJ (2015) ‘Best-worst scaling: theory, methods and applications.’ (Cambridge University Press)

Madden A, Lea T, Bath N, Winstock AR (2008) Satisfaction guaranteed? What clients on methadone and buprenorphine think about their treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review 27, 671–678.
Satisfaction guaranteed? What clients on methadone and buprenorphine think about their treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, Wodak A, Panda S, Tyndall M, Toufik A, Mattick RP (2008) Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet 372, 1733–1745.
Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Ali H, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Mattick RP, Myers B, Ambekar A, Strathdee SA (2010) HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for people who inject drugs: a systematic review of global, regional, and national coverage. The Lancet 375, 1014–1028.
HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for people who inject drugs: a systematic review of global, regional, and national coverage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McHugh RK, DeVito EE, Dodd D, Carroll KM, Potter JS, Greenfield SF, Connery HS, Weiss RD (2013) Gender differences in a clinical trial for prescription opioid dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 45, 38–43.
Gender differences in a clinical trial for prescription opioid dependence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muthulingam D, Bia J, Madden LM, Farnum SO, Barry DT, Altice FL (2019) Using nominal group technique to identify barriers, facilitators, and preferences among patients seeking treatment for opioid use disorder: a needs assessment for decision making support. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 100, 18–28.
Using nominal group technique to identify barriers, facilitators, and preferences among patients seeking treatment for opioid use disorder: a needs assessment for decision making support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson PK, Mathers BM, Cowie B, Hagan H, Des Jarlais D, Horyniak D, Degenhardt L (2011) Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: results of systematic reviews. The Lancet 378, 571–583.
Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: results of systematic reviews.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nielsen S, Hillhouse M, Mooney L, Ang A, Ling W (2015) Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy and behavioral treatment: comparison of outcomes among prescription opioid users, heroin users and combination users. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 48, 70–76.
Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy and behavioral treatment: comparison of outcomes among prescription opioid users, heroin users and combination users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nielsen S, Picco L, Campbell G, Lintzeris N, Larance B, Farrell M, Degenhardt L, Bruno R (2020) Development of a brief patient-administered screening tool for prescription opioid dependence for primary care settings. Pain Medicine 21, e79–e88.
Development of a brief patient-administered screening tool for prescription opioid dependence for primary care settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Niv N, Hser Y-I (2007) Women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs: Service needs, utilization and outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 87, 194–201.
Women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs: Service needs, utilization and outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15, 625–632.
Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

North Richmond Community Health (2022) Medically supervised injecting room [Online]. (North Richmond Community Health: Melbourne) Available at https://nrch.com.au/services/medically-supervised-injecting-room/ [Accessed 10/02/2022]

Parlier-Ahmad AB, Martin CE, Radic M, Svikis DS (2021) An exploratory study of sex and gender differences in demographic, psychosocial, clinical, and substance use treatment characteristics of patients in outpatient opioid use disorder treatment with buprenorphine. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 7, 141–153.
An exploratory study of sex and gender differences in demographic, psychosocial, clinical, and substance use treatment characteristics of patients in outpatient opioid use disorder treatment with buprenorphine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pergolizzi JV, Raffa RB, Rosenblatt MH (2020) Opioid withdrawal symptoms, a consequence of chronic opioid use and opioid use disorder: current understanding and approaches to management. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 45, 892–903.
Opioid withdrawal symptoms, a consequence of chronic opioid use and opioid use disorder: current understanding and approaches to management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (2022) PBS Schedule search for “buprenorphine” [Online]. (Department of Health: Canberra) Available at https://www.pbs.gov.au/pbs/search?term=buprenorphine&search-type=medicines&analyse=false [Accessed 30/03/2022]

Prendergast ML, Messina NP, Hall EA, Warda US (2011) The relative effectiveness of women-only and mixed-gender treatment for substance-abusing women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 40, 336–348.
The relative effectiveness of women-only and mixed-gender treatment for substance-abusing women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ross J, Teesson M, Darke S, Lynskey M, Ali R, Ritter A, Cooke R (2005) The characteristics of heroin users entering treatment: findings from the Australian treatment outcome study (ATOS). Drug and Alcohol Review 24, 411–418.
The characteristics of heroin users entering treatment: findings from the Australian treatment outcome study (ATOS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saunders SM, Zygowicz KM, D’Angelo BR (2006) Person-related and treatment-related barriers to alcohol treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 30, 261–270.
Person-related and treatment-related barriers to alcohol treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, Indave BI, Degenhardt L, Wiessing L, Ferri M, Pastor-Barriuso R (2017) Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ 357, j1550
Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tran BX, Nguyen LT (2013) Impact of methadone maintenance on health utility, health care utilization and expenditure in drug users with HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Drug Policy 24, e105–e110.
Impact of methadone maintenance on health utility, health care utilization and expenditure in drug users with HIV/AIDS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Treloar C, Fraser S, Valentine K (2007) Valuing methadone takeaway doses: the contribution of service-user perspectives to policy and practice. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 14, 61–74.
Valuing methadone takeaway doses: the contribution of service-user perspectives to policy and practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2008) Drug policy and results in Australia. Available at https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/Drug_Policy_Australia_Oct2008.pdf [Accessed 1/03/2023]

University of California, Los Angeles (2021) Chapter 2 – Regression diagnostics. In ‘Regression with Stata’ [Online]. (UCLA: Los Angeles). Available at https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/stata/webbooks/reg/chapter2/stata-webbooksregressionwith-statachapter-2-regression-diagnostics/ [Accessed 15/03/2023]

Winkelman TNA, Chang VW, Binswanger IA (2018) Health, polysubstance use, and criminal justice involvement among adults with varying levels of opioid use. JAMA Network Open 1, e180558
Health, polysubstance use, and criminal justice involvement among adults with varying levels of opioid use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |