Evaluating the prevention of premature cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the general practice setting during the scheduled child immunisation consultation: a pilot study
Jennifer Ayton A B C , Faline Howes A , Emily Hansen B and Mark Nelson AA Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.
B School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 22, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: jennifer.ayton@utas.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 21(3) 299-304 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY13152
Submitted: 8 November 2013 Accepted: 5 May 2014 Published: 5 June 2014
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test and evaluate the feasibility and clinical acceptability of the use of an infant feeding data collection tool during the scheduled childhood immunisation consultation, and to explore the appropriateness of this consultation as a site for a future intervention aiming to increase exclusive breastfeeding through the provision of advice and support to mothers. This descriptive exploratory (quantitative and qualitative) study used purposeful sampling to enrol five general practices in Hobart, Tasmania. General practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) trialled and evaluated a paper-based data collection tool over a 6-week period from May through to June 2011. Twenty-two (13 GPs; 2 GP registrars and 7 PNs) participants trialled and evaluated the data collection tool (n = 54). From the evaluation questionnaire, field notes and informal interviews (n = 7), six conceptual headings emerged: setting; time pressures; resources and collaboration; mothers need to talk; professional exclusion; and lack of collaboration. The scheduled childhood immunisation consultation provides an opportunity for mothers and primary health practitioners to talk briefly about infant feeding and for the collection of infant feeding data. However, the immunisation consultation is not well suited to a breastfeeding support intervention as it is already very busy focusing on immunisation issues. Consideration should be given to the evaluation of a dedicated general practice/primary health ‘infant feeding’ consultation.
Additional keywords: infant feeding, practice nurse.
References
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2010) 2010 Australian National Infant Feeding Survey: Indicator Results. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.Britt H, Miller G, Charles J, Henderson J, Bayram C, Valenti L, Pan Y, Harrison C, Fahridin S, O’Halloran J (2009) General practice activity in Australia 1999–00 to 2008–09: 10 year data tables. General practice series no. 26. Cat. no. GEP 26. AIHW, Canberra.
Brodribb W, Jackson C, Fallon AB, Hegney D (2007) Breastfeeding and the responsibilities of GPs: a qualitative study of general practice registrars. Australian Family Physician 36, 283–285.
Burns E, Schmied V, Sheehan A, Fenwick J (2010) A meta-ethnographic synthesis of women’s experience of breastfeeding. Maternal and Child Nutrition 6, 201–219.
Dyson L, Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, McCormick F, Herbert G, Thomas J (2010) Policy and public health recommendations to promote the initiation and duration of breast-feeding in developed country settings. Public Health Nutrition 13, 137–144.
| Policy and public health recommendations to promote the initiation and duration of breast-feeding in developed country settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19686608PubMed |
Elliott-Rudder M, Pilotto L, McIntyre E, Ramanathan S (2014) Motivational interviewing improves exclusive breastfeeding in an Australian randomised controlled trial. Acta Paediatrica 103, e11–e16.
| Motivational interviewing improves exclusive breastfeeding in an Australian randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2c%2Fkt1Grsw%3D%3D&md5=1f0f30b4291a08673ef295fc1b78e409CAS | 24117857PubMed |
Feldens CA, Vitolo MR, Rauber F, Cruz LN, Hilgert JB (2012) Risk factors for discontinuing breastfeeding in southern Brazil: a survival analysis. Maternal and Child Health Journal 16, 1257–1265.
| Risk factors for discontinuing breastfeeding in southern Brazil: a survival analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21948218PubMed |
Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, Victoria CG (2007) ‘Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding; systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Report).’ (World Health Organization: Geneva)
Kemp L, Harris E, McMahon C, Matthey S, Vimpani G, Anderson T, Schmied V, Aslam H, Zapart S (2011) Child and family outcomes of a long-term nurse home visitation programme: a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood 96, 533–540.
| Child and family outcomes of a long-term nurse home visitation programme: a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21429975PubMed |
Kramer MS, Kakuma R (2012) Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD003517
Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shapiro S, Collet JP, Vanilovich I, Mezen I, Ducruet T, Shishko G, Zubovich V, Mknuik D, Gluchanina E, Dombrovskiy V, Ustinovitch A, Kot T, Bogdanovich N, Ovchinikova L, Helsing E (2001) Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. Journal of the American Medical Association 285, 413–420.
| Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7nvVKitw%3D%3D&md5=3ec96d86f59447ce61de74c77336ac4dCAS | 11242425PubMed |
Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) ‘Within-Case Displays: Exploring and Describing. Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook’, 2nd edn. (SAGE: California)
National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) ‘Australian Dietary Guidelines.’ (Australian Government: Canberra)
Renfrew MJ, McCormick FM, Wade A, Quinn B, Dowswell T (2012) Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD001141
Santo LC, de Oliveira LD, Giugliani ER (2007) Factors associated with low incidence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months. Birth 34, 212–219.
| Factors associated with low incidence of exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17718871PubMed |
Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, McCourt C, Dykes F (2011a) Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis. Birth 38, 49–60.
| Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21332775PubMed |
Schmied V, Gribble K, Sheehan A, Taylor C, Dykes FC (2011b) Ten steps or climbing a mountain: a study of Australian health professionals’ perceptions of implementing the baby friendly health initiative to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. BMC Health Services Research 11, 208
| Ten steps or climbing a mountain: a study of Australian health professionals’ perceptions of implementing the baby friendly health initiative to protect, promote and support breastfeeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21878131PubMed |
Thulier D, Mercer J (2009) Variables associated with breastfeeding duration. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 38, 259–268.
| Variables associated with breastfeeding duration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19538614PubMed |
World Health Organization (2007) ‘Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices; Part 1 Defintions.’ (World Health Organization: Geneva)
World Health Organization/UNICEF (2012) Global strategy on infant and young child feeding. Sixty-fifth World Health assembly implementation plan for maternal, infant and young child nutrition. (World Health Organization: Geneva) Available at http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/news_events/news/2012/30_07_2012/en/ [Verified 12 July 2013]
