Perceptions of barriers to discussing and testing for sexually transmitted infections in a convenience sample of general practice patients
Joanne R. Baker A , Diane E. Arnold-Reed A D , Tom Brett A , Dana A. Hince A , Ilse O’Ferrall B and Max K. Bulsara CA General Practice and Primary Care Research, School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, WA 6959, Australia.
B Preventive and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, WA 6959, Australia.
C Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Research, University of Notre Dame, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, WA 6959, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: Diane.Arnold-Reed@nd.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 19(2) 98-101 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY11110
Submitted: 2 September 2011 Accepted: 28 December 2011 Published: 25 January 2012
Abstract
We aimed to identify patient perceptions of barriers to discussing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at the primary care level. An anonymous questionnaire was available to patients (16–70 years) in the waiting room of four metropolitan Perth general practices. Results are based on 370 participant views (9.5% of the potential target population). Patients felt comfortable discussing STIs with their general practitioner (GP) and their level of comfort would be enhanced if they knew their GP had a special interest or qualification in sexual health. Willingness to discuss issues increased or remained unchanged if the GP took time to explain it to them or was a good listener. Patients were willing to discuss STIs if they were a new patient and irrespective of the GP’s gender and age. Fewer patients were willing to discuss STIs if they knew the GP socially. Patients who had sex with a new partner were willing to request a STI test from their GP. Patients were not embarrassed if discussion was initiated in a consultation unrelated to sexual health and did not mind discussing the topic in the presence of a partner or parent, though this depended on circumstances. Waiting room STI test advertising did not affect patient comfort level. Patients would involve their GP when seeking information about STIs. Patients have fewer barriers to discussing sexual health matters than perceived by GPs.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) 2009–10 Year Book Australia. Cat No.1301.0. (ABS: Canberra)Brackbill RM, Sternberg MR, Fishbein M (1999) Where do people go for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases? Family Planning Perspectives 31, 10–15.
| Where do people go for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lsVWruw%3D%3D&md5=fbb17814cd252cf2338a747e4af0d7eaCAS |
Cassell JA, Brook MG, Mercer CH, Murphy S, Johnson AM (2003) Treating sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a missed opportunity? Sexually Transmitted Infections 79, 134–136.
| Treating sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a missed opportunity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7pvVaitQ%3D%3D&md5=09762971a2c9150e9b493106cb076e3bCAS |
Freedman E, Britt H, Harrison CM, Mindel A (2006) Sexual health problems managed in Australian general practice: a national, cross sectional survey. Sexually Transmitted Infections 82, 61–66.
| Sexual health problems managed in Australian general practice: a national, cross sectional survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2Fnslartw%3D%3D&md5=279c0e06eeed9383e9ee234c14aa7964CAS |
Johnston VJ, Britt H, Pan Y, Mindel A (2004) The management of sexually transmitted infections by Australian general practitioners. Sexually Transmitted Infections 80, 212–215.
| The management of sexually transmitted infections by Australian general practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czgtVyqtQ%3D%3D&md5=f7e044f4ad134a8ef79e09f68fb1f1e0CAS |
Khan A, Plummer D, Hussain R, Minichiello V (2008) Does physician bias affect the quality of care they deliver? Evidence in the care of sexually transmitted infections. Sexually Transmitted Infections 84, 150–151.
| Does physician bias affect the quality of care they deliver? Evidence in the care of sexually transmitted infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3htVSqsg%3D%3D&md5=85788470fd3defa5e04dd998be622c2fCAS |
McNulty CA, Freeman E, Bowen J, Shefras J, Fenton KA (2004) Barriers to opportunistic chlamydia testing in primary care. The British Journal of General Practice 54, 508–514.
Miller CA, Tebb KP, Jody K, Williams MA, Neuhaus JM, Shafer MA (2007) Chlamydial screening in urgent care visits: adolescent-reported acceptability associated with adolescent perception of clinical communication. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 161, 777–782.
| Chlamydial screening in urgent care visits: adolescent-reported acceptability associated with adolescent perception of clinical communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Temple-Smith MJ, Mulvey G, Keogh L (1999) Attitudes to taking a sexual history in general practice in Victoria, Australia. Sexually Transmitted Infections 75, 41–44.
| Attitudes to taking a sexual history in general practice in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1MznslCmsg%3D%3D&md5=60aacb3a203c908684877068a75f94bbCAS |
Verhoeven V, Bovijn K, Helder A, Peremans L, Hermann I, Van Royen P, Denekens J, Avonts D (2003) Discussing STIs: doctors are from Mars, patients from Venus. Family Practice 20, 11–15.
| Discussing STIs: doctors are from Mars, patients from Venus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FgtlCnsA%3D%3D&md5=14f0254d98ecf02e01ea83a7b1664aa1CAS |
Verhoeven V, Colliers A, Verster A, Avonts D, Peremans L, Van Royen P (2007) Collecting data for sexually transmitted infections (STI) surveillance: what do patients prefer in Flanders? BMC Health Services Research 7, 149
| Collecting data for sexually transmitted infections (STI) surveillance: what do patients prefer in Flanders?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
