Australian health professionals’ social media (Web 2.0) adoption trends: early 21st century health care delivery and practice promotion
Wayne T. UsherSchool of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Qld 4222, Australia. Email: w.usher@griffith.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 18(1) 31-41 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY10084
Submitted: 9 November 2010 Accepted: 8 April 2011 Published: 16 September 2011
Abstract
This study was concerned with indentifying reasons behind patterns of social media (Web 2.0) usage associated with eight of Australia’s major health professions. Attention was given to uncovering some of the more significant motivations for the resistance or adoption of Web 2.0 technologies for health care delivery and practice promotion by Australian health professionals. Surveys were developed from a common set of questions with specific variations between professions negotiated with professional health societies. Survey questions were constructed in an attempt to identify Web 2.0 adoption trends. An online survey (www.limesurvey.org) was used to collect data. Initial data preparation involved the development of one integrated SPSS file to incorporate all responses from the eight surveys undertaken. Initial data analysis applied Frequencies and Crosstabs to the identified groups and provided a profile of respondents by key business and demographic characteristics. Of the 935 respondents, 9.5% of participants indicated that they used Web 2.0 for their professional work, 19.1% of them did not use it for work but used it for their personal needs and 71.3% of them did not use Web 2.0 at all. Participants have indicated that the main reason for ‘choosing not to adopt’ Web 2.0 applications as a way of delivering health care to their patients is due to the health professionals’ lack of understanding of Web 2.0 (83.3%), while the main reason for ‘choosing to adopt’ Web 2.0 applications is the perception of Web 2.0 as a quick and effective method of communication (73.0%). This study has indicated that Australian health professionals ‘choose not to adopt’ Web 2.0 usage as a way of delivering health care primarily due to ‘a lack of understanding as to how social media would be used in health care’ (83.3%). This study identifies that Australian health professionals are interacting with Web 2.0 technologies in their private lives but are failing to see how such technologies might be used throughout their professions. Australian health professionals are willing to undertake online educational courses (n = 553, 58%) designed to upskill them about how Web 2.0 may be used for practice promotion and health care delivery.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005) ‘Household use of information technology for years pertaining to 2001–2003’. (ABS: Canberra).Cain J, Brent I, Fox P (2009) Web 2.0 and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 73, 1–11.
Department of Health and Ageing (2008) Towards a National Primary Health Care Strategy: a discussion paper from the Australian Government. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/primaryhealthstrategy [Verified 29 May 2010]
Eysenbach G, Jadad A (2000) Consumer health informatics. BMJ 320, 1713–1716.
Fox S, Jones S (2009). The social life of health information. Pew Internet. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx [Verified 18 May 2010]
Lindsay S, Smith S, Bellaby P, Baker R (2007) Tackling the digital divide: exploring the impact of ICT on managing heart conditions. Information, Communication & Society 10, 95–114.
Lindsay S, Bellaby P, Smith S, Baker R (2008) Enabling healthy choices: Is ICT the highway to health improvement? Health (London) 12, 313–331.
| Enabling healthy choices: Is ICT the highway to health improvement?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kamel Boulos MN, Wheeler S (2007) The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal 24, 2–23.
Masters K (2008) For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the internet: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 77, 4–16.
| For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the internet: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17137833PubMed |
Nahm ES, Blum K, Scharf B, Friedmann E, Thomas S, Jones D, Gottlieb SS (2008) Exploration of patients’ readiness for an eHealth management program for chronic heart failure: a preliminary study. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 23, 463–471.
Pew Internet and American Life Project (2009) The social life of health information. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx [Verified 29 May 2010]
Powell J, Jennings A, Armstrong N, Sturt J, Dale J (2009) Pilot study of a virtual diabetes clinic: satisfaction and usability. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 15, 150–152.
| Pilot study of a virtual diabetes clinic: satisfaction and usability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19364901PubMed |
Prensky M (2006) ‘Don’t bother me mom – I’m learning! How computer and video games are preparing your kids for twenty-first century success and how you can help .’ (Paragon House: St Paul, MN)
Ruotsalainen P, Iivari AK, Doupi P (2008) Finland’s strategy and implementation of citizens’ access to health information. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 137, 379–385.
Seeman N (2008) Web 2.0 and chronic illness: new horizons, new opportunities. Electronic Healthcare 6, 104–110.
Sheppard L, Mackintosh S (1998) Technology in education: what is appropriate for rural and remote allied health professionals? The Australian Journal of Rural Health 6, 189–193.
| Technology in education: what is appropriate for rural and remote allied health professionals?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7hslOiuw%3D%3D&md5=a4a1cef754ab58630827fca06882ea3eCAS | 9919075PubMed |
Usher W (2009) Gold Coast General Practitioners understanding pertaining to reliability, interactive and usability components associated with health websites. International Journal of Behaviour and Information Technology 28, 39–44.
| Gold Coast General Practitioners understanding pertaining to reliability, interactive and usability components associated with health websites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Uden-Kraan CF (2009) Health-related internet use by patients with somatic diseases: frequency of use and characteristics of users. Informatics for Health & Social Care 34, 18–29.
| Health-related internet use by patients with somatic diseases: frequency of use and characteristics of users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weinert C, Cudney S, Hill W (2008) Health knowledge acquisition by rural women with chronic health conditions: a tale of two Web approaches. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 16, 302–307.
| Health knowledge acquisition by rural women with chronic health conditions: a tale of two Web approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18808489PubMed |
World Health Organisation (2006) The social determinants of health. WHO: Geneva Available at http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/ [Verified 29 May 2010]
Yee KC, Miils E, Airey C (2008) Perfect match? Generation Y as change agents for information communication technology implementation in healthcare. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 136, 496–501.
Young J, Simon W (2005). ‘iCon: Steve Jobs, the greatest second act in the history of business’. (John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ).
